What is the role of immunomodulators in children with allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis and asthma? A systematic review of the literature and evidence-based guideline recommendation

JosephL Mathew, Satnam Kaur, Amber Kumar, Vivek Saxena
{"title":"What is the role of immunomodulators in children with allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis and asthma? A systematic review of the literature and evidence-based guideline recommendation","authors":"JosephL Mathew, Satnam Kaur, Amber Kumar, Vivek Saxena","doi":"10.4103/jopp.jopp_37_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Allergic Bronchopulmonary Aspergillosis (ABPA) is a complex allergic disorder complicating asthma and cystic fibrosis. Steroids and antifungal agents are the mainstay of ABPA treatment. But almost half the patients relapse on tapering the steroids and some become steroid dependent, requiring continuous oral steroids. Therefore, immunomodulators targeting Th2 inflammation are being tried for treating ABPA. Objective: This systematic review was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of immunomodulators for ABPA in children asthma, to develop an evidence-based recommendation. The research question was: In children with asthma having ABPA, what is the efficacy and safety of therapy with biologicals (compared with not using biologicals), on multiple clinical outcomes? Methods: A search for pre-existing guidelines and systematic reviews yielded no relevant results. We, therefore, undertook a new systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs), addressing the question. Results: We identified only two small RCTs, in ABPA complicating asthma. The first evaluated omalizumab, and the other was a conference abstract on dupilumab. Both trials had methodological limitations, and evidence was graded as ‘very low certainty’. Neither trial suggested any benefit of using immunomodulators in those with asthma, having ABPA. Conclusion: We recommend against immunotherapy with biologicals including omalizumab or dupilumab in children with asthma and ABPA (conditional recommendation, very low certainty of evidence).","PeriodicalId":473926,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Pulmonology","volume":"280 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Pulmonology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jopp.jopp_37_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Allergic Bronchopulmonary Aspergillosis (ABPA) is a complex allergic disorder complicating asthma and cystic fibrosis. Steroids and antifungal agents are the mainstay of ABPA treatment. But almost half the patients relapse on tapering the steroids and some become steroid dependent, requiring continuous oral steroids. Therefore, immunomodulators targeting Th2 inflammation are being tried for treating ABPA. Objective: This systematic review was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of immunomodulators for ABPA in children asthma, to develop an evidence-based recommendation. The research question was: In children with asthma having ABPA, what is the efficacy and safety of therapy with biologicals (compared with not using biologicals), on multiple clinical outcomes? Methods: A search for pre-existing guidelines and systematic reviews yielded no relevant results. We, therefore, undertook a new systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs), addressing the question. Results: We identified only two small RCTs, in ABPA complicating asthma. The first evaluated omalizumab, and the other was a conference abstract on dupilumab. Both trials had methodological limitations, and evidence was graded as ‘very low certainty’. Neither trial suggested any benefit of using immunomodulators in those with asthma, having ABPA. Conclusion: We recommend against immunotherapy with biologicals including omalizumab or dupilumab in children with asthma and ABPA (conditional recommendation, very low certainty of evidence).
免疫调节剂在过敏性支气管肺曲霉病和哮喘患儿中的作用是什么?对文献和循证指南建议进行系统回顾
背景:过敏性支气管肺曲霉病(ABPA)是一种复杂的过敏性疾病,并发哮喘和囊性纤维化。类固醇和抗真菌药物是ABPA治疗的主要药物。但几乎一半的患者在逐渐减少类固醇用量后会复发,有些人会对类固醇产生依赖,需要持续口服类固醇。因此,针对Th2炎症的免疫调节剂正在被尝试用于治疗ABPA。目的:本系统综述旨在评价免疫调节剂治疗儿童哮喘ABPA的疗效,并提出循证推荐。研究的问题是:在患有ABPA的哮喘儿童中,使用生物制剂治疗(与不使用生物制剂相比)对多种临床结果的疗效和安全性如何?方法:搜索已有的指南和系统评价没有得到相关的结果。因此,我们对随机对照试验(rct)进行了一项新的系统评价,以解决这个问题。结果:我们只确定了两个小的随机对照试验,在ABPA合并哮喘。第一篇是评估omalizumab,另一篇是关于dupilumab的会议摘要。两项试验都有方法学上的局限性,证据被评为“非常低的确定性”。两项试验均未显示在患有ABPA的哮喘患者中使用免疫调节剂有任何益处。结论:我们不建议哮喘和ABPA患儿使用包括omalizumab或dupilumab在内的生物制剂进行免疫治疗(有条件推荐,证据确定性非常低)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信