Should antifungal agents be prescribed to asthmatic children with ABPA? A systematic review and evidence-based guideline recommendation

JosephL Mathew, Shetanshu Srivastava, Rashmi Kapoor, Somu Sivabalan, Pawan Kalyan, Sanjay Bafna, Hardeep Kaur
{"title":"Should antifungal agents be prescribed to asthmatic children with ABPA? A systematic review and evidence-based guideline recommendation","authors":"JosephL Mathew, Shetanshu Srivastava, Rashmi Kapoor, Somu Sivabalan, Pawan Kalyan, Sanjay Bafna, Hardeep Kaur","doi":"10.4103/jopp.jopp_30_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) is a complication of bronchial asthma. Many physicians routinely administer antifungal agents along with corticosteroids to children with ABPA, based on a few adult studies. Objective: We examined the evidence on efficacy and safety of antifungal agents in asthmatic patients with ABPA, to develop a guideline recommendation. Methods: Our research question was: What is the efficacy of antifungal agents in asthmatic children with ABPA, on various clinical outcomes? We conducted a systematic review (SR), with a stepwise evidence search for any preexisting guidelines whose recommendations could be adopted or adapted; followed by a search for existing SRs, followed by randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The evidence was collated, critically appraised, and synthesized. We then worked through the Evidence to Decision (EtD) framework, to formulate recommendations, using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. Results: There were no preexisting evidence-based guidelines or SRs addressing our question. Our new SR identified five RCTs in adults. These, had different designs, were limited in methodological quality, and examined different interventions. The body of evidence suggested that antifungal agents alone may not be efficacious in adults with ABPA. The certainty of evidence had to be downgraded for methodological limitations and indirectness for almost all outcomes in the five trials. Based on the considerations in the EtD framework, we were unable to formulate an evidence-based recommendation, either in favor of, or against, the intervention. Therefore, individual clinicians need not consider a change in their existing practice, i.e., those using antifungals may continue to do so and vice versa (until additional evidence becomes available). Conclusion: We offer a conditional recommendation that antifungal agents may or may not be added to steroid therapy in asthmatic children with ABPA (low certainty of evidence).","PeriodicalId":473926,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Pulmonology","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Pulmonology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jopp.jopp_30_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) is a complication of bronchial asthma. Many physicians routinely administer antifungal agents along with corticosteroids to children with ABPA, based on a few adult studies. Objective: We examined the evidence on efficacy and safety of antifungal agents in asthmatic patients with ABPA, to develop a guideline recommendation. Methods: Our research question was: What is the efficacy of antifungal agents in asthmatic children with ABPA, on various clinical outcomes? We conducted a systematic review (SR), with a stepwise evidence search for any preexisting guidelines whose recommendations could be adopted or adapted; followed by a search for existing SRs, followed by randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The evidence was collated, critically appraised, and synthesized. We then worked through the Evidence to Decision (EtD) framework, to formulate recommendations, using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. Results: There were no preexisting evidence-based guidelines or SRs addressing our question. Our new SR identified five RCTs in adults. These, had different designs, were limited in methodological quality, and examined different interventions. The body of evidence suggested that antifungal agents alone may not be efficacious in adults with ABPA. The certainty of evidence had to be downgraded for methodological limitations and indirectness for almost all outcomes in the five trials. Based on the considerations in the EtD framework, we were unable to formulate an evidence-based recommendation, either in favor of, or against, the intervention. Therefore, individual clinicians need not consider a change in their existing practice, i.e., those using antifungals may continue to do so and vice versa (until additional evidence becomes available). Conclusion: We offer a conditional recommendation that antifungal agents may or may not be added to steroid therapy in asthmatic children with ABPA (low certainty of evidence).
哮喘患儿ABPA应开抗真菌药吗?系统评价和循证指南建议
背景:过敏性支气管肺曲霉病(ABPA)是支气管哮喘的一种并发症。根据一些成人研究,许多医生对患有ABPA的儿童常规使用抗真菌药物和皮质类固醇。目的:我们研究抗真菌药物治疗哮喘ABPA患者的有效性和安全性,以制定指南推荐。方法:我们的研究问题是:抗真菌药物对哮喘ABPA患儿的各种临床结果的疗效如何?我们进行了一项系统评价(SR),对任何可采用或调整建议的现有指南进行逐步证据检索;然后搜索现有的SRs,然后进行随机对照试验(rct)。证据经过整理、严格评估和综合。然后,我们通过决策证据(EtD)框架,使用建议分级评估,发展和评估方法制定建议。结果:没有预先存在的循证指南或SRs解决我们的问题。我们的新SR确定了5项成人随机对照试验。这些研究具有不同的设计,方法质量有限,并检查了不同的干预措施。大量证据表明,单独使用抗真菌药物可能对成人ABPA无效。由于方法学的限制和五项试验中几乎所有结果的间接性,证据的确定性不得不降低。基于EtD框架的考虑,我们无法制定基于证据的建议,无论是支持还是反对干预措施。因此,个别临床医生不需要考虑改变他们现有的做法,即,那些使用抗真菌药物的人可以继续这样做,反之亦然(直到获得额外的证据)。结论:我们提供有条件的建议,抗真菌药物可能会或可能不会添加到类固醇治疗哮喘患儿ABPA(证据的低确定性)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信