Analytical Framework for Sensing Requirements Definition in Non-Cooperative UAS Sense and Avoid

IF 4.4 2区 地球科学 Q1 REMOTE SENSING
Drones Pub Date : 2023-10-03 DOI:10.3390/drones7100621
Giancarmine Fasano, Roberto Opromolla
{"title":"Analytical Framework for Sensing Requirements Definition in Non-Cooperative UAS Sense and Avoid","authors":"Giancarmine Fasano, Roberto Opromolla","doi":"10.3390/drones7100621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper provides an analytical framework to address the definition of sensing requirements in non-cooperative UAS sense and avoid. The generality of the approach makes it useful for the exploration of sensor design and selection trade-offs, for the definition of tailored and adaptive sensing strategies, and for the evaluation of the potential of given sensing architectures, also concerning their interface to airspace rules and traffic characteristics. The framework comprises a set of analytical relations covering the following technical aspects: field of view and surveillance rate requirements in azimuth and elevation; the link between sensing accuracy and closest point of approach estimates, expressed though approximated derivatives valid in near-collision conditions; the diverse (but interconnected) effects of sensing accuracy and detection range on the probabilities of missed and false conflict detections. A key idea consists of focusing on a specific target time to closest point of approach at obstacle declaration as the key driver for sensing system design and tuning, which allows accounting for the variability of conflict conditions within the aircraft field of regard. Numerical analyses complement the analytical developments to demonstrate their statistical consistency and to show quantitative examples of the variation of sensing performance as a function of the conflict geometry, as well as highlighting potential implications of the derived concepts. The developed framework can potentially be used to support holistic approaches and evaluations in different scenarios, including the very low-altitude urban airspace.","PeriodicalId":36448,"journal":{"name":"Drones","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drones","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/drones7100621","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REMOTE SENSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper provides an analytical framework to address the definition of sensing requirements in non-cooperative UAS sense and avoid. The generality of the approach makes it useful for the exploration of sensor design and selection trade-offs, for the definition of tailored and adaptive sensing strategies, and for the evaluation of the potential of given sensing architectures, also concerning their interface to airspace rules and traffic characteristics. The framework comprises a set of analytical relations covering the following technical aspects: field of view and surveillance rate requirements in azimuth and elevation; the link between sensing accuracy and closest point of approach estimates, expressed though approximated derivatives valid in near-collision conditions; the diverse (but interconnected) effects of sensing accuracy and detection range on the probabilities of missed and false conflict detections. A key idea consists of focusing on a specific target time to closest point of approach at obstacle declaration as the key driver for sensing system design and tuning, which allows accounting for the variability of conflict conditions within the aircraft field of regard. Numerical analyses complement the analytical developments to demonstrate their statistical consistency and to show quantitative examples of the variation of sensing performance as a function of the conflict geometry, as well as highlighting potential implications of the derived concepts. The developed framework can potentially be used to support holistic approaches and evaluations in different scenarios, including the very low-altitude urban airspace.
非合作UAS感知需求定义分析框架与规避
本文提供了一个分析框架来解决非合作无人机感知需求的定义和避免问题。该方法的通用性使其有助于探索传感器设计和选择权衡,定义定制和自适应传感策略,以及评估给定传感体系结构的潜力,以及它们与空域规则和交通特征的接口。该框架包括一套分析关系,涵盖下列技术方面:方位角和仰角的视场和监视速率要求;感知精度和最接近点估计之间的联系,通过在近碰撞条件下有效的近似导数表示;传感精度和检测距离对冲突检测漏检和误检概率的不同(但相互关联的)影响。一个关键的想法是,将关注障碍物声明时距离最近的接近点的特定目标时间作为传感系统设计和调整的关键驱动因素,这允许考虑飞机领域内冲突条件的可变性。数值分析补充了分析发展,以证明其统计一致性,并展示了作为冲突几何函数的传感性能变化的定量例子,并突出了派生概念的潜在影响。开发的框架可用于支持不同情景下的整体方法和评估,包括极低空城市空域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Drones
Drones Engineering-Aerospace Engineering
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
18.80%
发文量
331
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信