Uncertainty and Forest Concessions in a Globalized World: Insights into Local Access to Forest Resources in Mozambique

IF 2.2 3区 社会学 Q2 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Ida Herdieckerhoff, Irmeli Mustalahti, Almeida Sitoe, Estêvão E. Chambule
{"title":"Uncertainty and Forest Concessions in a Globalized World: Insights into Local Access to Forest Resources in Mozambique","authors":"Ida Herdieckerhoff, Irmeli Mustalahti, Almeida Sitoe, Estêvão E. Chambule","doi":"10.1080/08941920.2023.2255152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Forest-based communities are embedded in complex and uncertain global processes. We aim to understand the repercussions of uncertainty on forest-based livelihoods through a focus on implications in terms of access to resources for inhabitants of forest concessions. Uncertainty is conceptualized as unpredictability (not knowing), limited knowledge (knowing too little), and ambiguity (knowing too much, too differently). This research is based on document analysis and a case study in Zambezia Province, Mozambique. In-depth interviews and observations were conducted in local communities and triangulated with interviews with NGOs, researchers, and government officials. The findings indicate that multiple actors draw on formal and informal institutions to mediate access to forest-derived resources, which exacerbates uncertainties. Unpredictability, limited knowledge, and ambiguity undermine access to such resources for local communities. This paper contributes to an understanding of uncertainty and suggests a collaborative approach to reduce and cope with different uncertainties in the quest toward sustainable forest-based livelihoods.","PeriodicalId":48223,"journal":{"name":"Society & Natural Resources","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Society & Natural Resources","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2023.2255152","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Forest-based communities are embedded in complex and uncertain global processes. We aim to understand the repercussions of uncertainty on forest-based livelihoods through a focus on implications in terms of access to resources for inhabitants of forest concessions. Uncertainty is conceptualized as unpredictability (not knowing), limited knowledge (knowing too little), and ambiguity (knowing too much, too differently). This research is based on document analysis and a case study in Zambezia Province, Mozambique. In-depth interviews and observations were conducted in local communities and triangulated with interviews with NGOs, researchers, and government officials. The findings indicate that multiple actors draw on formal and informal institutions to mediate access to forest-derived resources, which exacerbates uncertainties. Unpredictability, limited knowledge, and ambiguity undermine access to such resources for local communities. This paper contributes to an understanding of uncertainty and suggests a collaborative approach to reduce and cope with different uncertainties in the quest toward sustainable forest-based livelihoods.
全球化世界中的不确定性和森林特许权:对莫桑比克当地森林资源获取的见解
以森林为基础的社区处于复杂和不确定的全球进程中。我们的目标是通过关注森林特许权居民获取资源方面的影响,了解不确定性对以森林为基础的生计的影响。不确定性被概念化为不可预测性(不知道),有限的知识(知道的太少)和模糊性(知道的太多,太不同)。本研究基于文献分析和莫桑比克赞比西亚省的案例研究。在当地社区进行了深入的访谈和观察,并与非政府组织、研究人员和政府官员的访谈进行了三角测量。调查结果表明,多个行动者利用正式和非正式机构来调解获取森林资源的机会,这加剧了不确定性。不可预测性、有限的知识和模糊性破坏了当地社区获得此类资源的机会。本文有助于理解不确定性,并提出了一种合作方法,以减少和应对各种不确定性,以实现可持续的森林生计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
8.00%
发文量
83
期刊介绍: Society and Natural Resources publishes cutting edge social science research that advances understanding of the interaction between society and natural resources.Social science research is extensive and comes from a number of disciplines, including sociology, psychology, political science, communications, planning, education, and anthropology. We welcome research from all of these disciplines and interdisciplinary social science research that transcends the boundaries of any single social science discipline. We define natural resources broadly to include water, air, wildlife, fisheries, forests, natural lands, urban ecosystems, and intensively managed lands. While we welcome all papers that fit within this broad scope, we especially welcome papers in the following four important and broad areas in the field: 1. Protected area management and governance 2. Stakeholder analysis, consultation and engagement; deliberation processes; governance; conflict resolution; social learning; social impact assessment 3. Theoretical frameworks, epistemological issues, and methodological perspectives 4. Multiscalar character of social implications of natural resource management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信