Constructive journalism as an alternative to sensationalism - specifics and tasks

Manana Shamilishvili, Mari Tsereteli, Natia Svanidze, Tinatin Matcharashvili
{"title":"Constructive journalism as an alternative to sensationalism - specifics and tasks","authors":"Manana Shamilishvili, Mari Tsereteli, Natia Svanidze, Tinatin Matcharashvili","doi":"10.52340/2023.05.04.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A well-made news story, as we know, must meet five criteria: urgency, importance, identification, sensation and conflict. However, it is obvious that the audience for \"good news\" prepared by these criteria is decreasing day by day. Why? The answer is simple - the journalist loses confidence. That is why the mentioned criteria have often become the subject of wide discussion. This reality gave impetus to the formation of a new vision, according to which a well-made news story should not lose viewers, but should strengthen trust between the media and citizens. Only such a model of journalism can strengthen the democratic dialogue and promote the unity of the society.Solution journalism can be considered a contextual function of journalism, a more fundamental type of journalism, which is also referred to as \"interpretive reporting, in-depth reporting, feature journalism, explanatory reporting, and analytical reporting\" (Fink, 2014). Decision journalism can also be placed in a similar but more specific category called constructive journalism, which “involves applying positive psychology techniques to news work to create more productive, engaging stories that are true to the core functions of journalism” (McIntyre, 2017). McIntyre describes constructive journalism as a “continuum” rather than a dichotomy. Shifts emphasis from \"straightforward\" reporting styles (peace vs. conflict, oppressor vs. oppressed) to comprehensive investigative reporting. \"Constructive journalism is a response to the increasing tabloidization, sensationalism and negative bias of modern media news\" (Jorgensen K. L., Risbrough I., 2021). The negativity bias reinforces the natural human tendency to assign more value to a negative story than to a positive one. In addition, it is known that a negative story has a greater impact on a person and remains in the mind for a long time. Social psychology studies this phenomenon. As a result, modern journalists who have to develop against \"fake news\" and the so-called In the post-reality era, the world is increasingly criticized for negative news coverage. The solution is constructive journalism, which will allow the modern media to regain the trust of the public, as it will offer it a way to find a solution to the problem.","PeriodicalId":12686,"journal":{"name":"GEORGIAN SCIENTISTS","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GEORGIAN SCIENTISTS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52340/2023.05.04.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A well-made news story, as we know, must meet five criteria: urgency, importance, identification, sensation and conflict. However, it is obvious that the audience for "good news" prepared by these criteria is decreasing day by day. Why? The answer is simple - the journalist loses confidence. That is why the mentioned criteria have often become the subject of wide discussion. This reality gave impetus to the formation of a new vision, according to which a well-made news story should not lose viewers, but should strengthen trust between the media and citizens. Only such a model of journalism can strengthen the democratic dialogue and promote the unity of the society.Solution journalism can be considered a contextual function of journalism, a more fundamental type of journalism, which is also referred to as "interpretive reporting, in-depth reporting, feature journalism, explanatory reporting, and analytical reporting" (Fink, 2014). Decision journalism can also be placed in a similar but more specific category called constructive journalism, which “involves applying positive psychology techniques to news work to create more productive, engaging stories that are true to the core functions of journalism” (McIntyre, 2017). McIntyre describes constructive journalism as a “continuum” rather than a dichotomy. Shifts emphasis from "straightforward" reporting styles (peace vs. conflict, oppressor vs. oppressed) to comprehensive investigative reporting. "Constructive journalism is a response to the increasing tabloidization, sensationalism and negative bias of modern media news" (Jorgensen K. L., Risbrough I., 2021). The negativity bias reinforces the natural human tendency to assign more value to a negative story than to a positive one. In addition, it is known that a negative story has a greater impact on a person and remains in the mind for a long time. Social psychology studies this phenomenon. As a result, modern journalists who have to develop against "fake news" and the so-called In the post-reality era, the world is increasingly criticized for negative news coverage. The solution is constructive journalism, which will allow the modern media to regain the trust of the public, as it will offer it a way to find a solution to the problem.
作为哗众取宠的替代品的建设性新闻——细节和任务
我们知道,一篇精心制作的新闻必须满足五个标准:紧迫性、重要性、识别性、轰动性和冲突性。然而,很明显,根据这些标准准备的“好消息”的受众正在日益减少。为什么?答案很简单——记者失去了信心。这就是为什么上述标准经常成为广泛讨论的主题。这一现实推动了一种新愿景的形成,即好的新闻不应该失去观众,而应该加强媒体与国民之间的信任。只有这样的新闻模式,才能加强民主对话,促进社会团结。解决方案新闻可以被认为是新闻的一种语境功能,这是一种更基本的新闻类型,也被称为“解释性报道,深度报道,专题报道,解释性报道和分析性报道”(Fink, 2014)。决策新闻也可以被归入一个类似但更具体的类别,即建设性新闻,它“涉及将积极心理学技术应用于新闻工作,以创造更有成效、更吸引人的故事,这些故事符合新闻的核心功能”(麦金太尔,2017)。麦金太尔将建设性新闻描述为一个“连续体”,而不是一个二分法。将重点从“直截了当”的报道风格(和平与冲突,压迫者与被压迫者)转向全面的调查报道。“建设性新闻是对现代媒体新闻日益增多的小报化、轰动主义和负面偏见的回应”(Jorgensen K. L., Risbrough I., 2021)。消极偏见强化了人类赋予负面故事比正面故事更多价值的自然倾向。此外,众所周知,一个负面的故事对一个人的影响更大,并在脑海中停留很长时间。社会心理学研究这种现象。因此,现代新闻工作者不得不发展反对“假新闻”和所谓的后现实时代,世界上越来越多的人批评负面新闻报道。解决办法是建设性的新闻,这将使现代媒体重新获得公众的信任,因为它将为找到解决问题的方法提供途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信