Netflix Recommends: Algorithms, Film Choice, and the History of Taste by Mattias Frey, and: Netflix and Streaming Video: The Business of Subscriber-Funded Video on Demand by Amanda D. Lotz (review)

IF 0.5 2区 艺术学 0 FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION
{"title":"Netflix Recommends: Algorithms, Film Choice, and the History of Taste by Mattias Frey, and: Netflix and Streaming Video: The Business of Subscriber-Funded Video on Demand by Amanda D. Lotz (review)","authors":"","doi":"10.1353/cj.2023.a910946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: Netflix Recommends: Algorithms, Film Choice, and the History of Taste by Mattias Frey, and: Netflix and Streaming Video: The Business of Subscriber-Funded Video on Demand by Amanda D. Lotz Ethan Tussey (bio) Netflix Recommends: Algorithms, Film Choice, and the History of Taste by Mattias Frey University of California Press. 2021. 282 pages. $85.00 hardcover; $29.95 paper; also available in e-book. Netflix and Streaming Video: The Business of Subscriber-Funded Video on Demand by Amanda D. Lotz Polity Press. 2022. 224 pages. $64.95 hardcover; $22.95 paper; also available in e-book. The schadenfreude that accompanied the news of Netflix missing its quarterly subscriber projections in the spring of 2022 represented an unusually boisterous public reaction to a stockholder meeting.1 For many observers, this served as a landmark moment in the streaming wars (the nickname for the perceived competition between subscription streaming platforms), a sign that [End Page 194] Netflix's meteoric rise could decelerate. It has been a decade since Netflix disrupted the status quo in the media industries by transitioning its video-rental company into a streaming media platform. In that time, anxious industry onlookers and internet utopians have wondered what the new normal would mean. Fueled by financial speculation, subscriber growth had been the metric of success for Netflix, but the drop in stock valuation shifted Netflix's focus to revenue and the launching of an advertising-supported tier.2 Netflix promised to revolutionize the entertainment industry, but subscription tiers and advertising breaks feel eerily familiar to those of us who remember a time before streaming. Has Netflix really changed the media industries? Answering that question are two new books on the streaming company that can help us assess the effects of the first decade of the streaming era. The more recent of the two, Netflix and Streaming Video: The Business of Subscriber-Funded Video on Demand, comes from one of the key voices on the subject, Amanda Lotz. Throughout her career, Lotz has demonstrated a keen ability to make the murky waters of streaming clearer by providing terminology, schemas, and resources for analyzing digital disruption, the global proliferation of services, and the historic antecedents for these platforms.3 Her latest work strives to correct several assumptions including two opposing points of view: that everything or nothing has fundamentally changed in the streaming era. Instead, Lotz convincingly contends that streaming media platforms, and Netflix especially, have distinct characteristics that must be considered when cataloging continuity and change. These distinctions become clear when one stops applying what Lotz calls the \"hegemony of linear norms\" to evaluations of Netflix.4 These norms have been carried over from the broadcast television era, such as the belief that the goal of programming is to gain the largest audience/ratings, that programming should foster scheduled regular viewing, and that media corporations are trying to channel audiences to particularly favored titles in which the company has a financial stake. The persistence of these norms has obscured understanding of Netflix as a parallel service sitting alongside the traditional television and film industries. As an alternative to these norms, Lotz provides a taxonomy defined by the geographic region, library specificity, library ownership, and corporate ownership of a given service, which when applied reveals the way these platforms craft their subscription propositions.5 By considering these factors, Lotz demonstrates how subscription platforms are designed to create content that facilitates a myriad of desired states of being, like multitasking viewing or comfort viewing, which have parallels in linear television but are foregrounded on digital platforms and become the reliable experiential offerings that ensure that churn—the loss of subscribers—remains low. Lotz [End Page 195] argues that when we look at streaming subscription services, we are looking at entertainment offerings that seem familiar but operate in unique ways. Lotz's work pairs nicely with Mattias Frey's new book Netflix Recommends: Algorithms, Film Choice, and the History of Taste. At first glance, Frey's claim that \"there may be more continuity than change in the digital age\" seems to adhere to the kind of binary prognostications that Lotz is reacting against, but Frey is no captive to the \"hegemony of...","PeriodicalId":55936,"journal":{"name":"JCMS-Journal of Cinema and Media Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCMS-Journal of Cinema and Media Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cj.2023.a910946","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Reviewed by: Netflix Recommends: Algorithms, Film Choice, and the History of Taste by Mattias Frey, and: Netflix and Streaming Video: The Business of Subscriber-Funded Video on Demand by Amanda D. Lotz Ethan Tussey (bio) Netflix Recommends: Algorithms, Film Choice, and the History of Taste by Mattias Frey University of California Press. 2021. 282 pages. $85.00 hardcover; $29.95 paper; also available in e-book. Netflix and Streaming Video: The Business of Subscriber-Funded Video on Demand by Amanda D. Lotz Polity Press. 2022. 224 pages. $64.95 hardcover; $22.95 paper; also available in e-book. The schadenfreude that accompanied the news of Netflix missing its quarterly subscriber projections in the spring of 2022 represented an unusually boisterous public reaction to a stockholder meeting.1 For many observers, this served as a landmark moment in the streaming wars (the nickname for the perceived competition between subscription streaming platforms), a sign that [End Page 194] Netflix's meteoric rise could decelerate. It has been a decade since Netflix disrupted the status quo in the media industries by transitioning its video-rental company into a streaming media platform. In that time, anxious industry onlookers and internet utopians have wondered what the new normal would mean. Fueled by financial speculation, subscriber growth had been the metric of success for Netflix, but the drop in stock valuation shifted Netflix's focus to revenue and the launching of an advertising-supported tier.2 Netflix promised to revolutionize the entertainment industry, but subscription tiers and advertising breaks feel eerily familiar to those of us who remember a time before streaming. Has Netflix really changed the media industries? Answering that question are two new books on the streaming company that can help us assess the effects of the first decade of the streaming era. The more recent of the two, Netflix and Streaming Video: The Business of Subscriber-Funded Video on Demand, comes from one of the key voices on the subject, Amanda Lotz. Throughout her career, Lotz has demonstrated a keen ability to make the murky waters of streaming clearer by providing terminology, schemas, and resources for analyzing digital disruption, the global proliferation of services, and the historic antecedents for these platforms.3 Her latest work strives to correct several assumptions including two opposing points of view: that everything or nothing has fundamentally changed in the streaming era. Instead, Lotz convincingly contends that streaming media platforms, and Netflix especially, have distinct characteristics that must be considered when cataloging continuity and change. These distinctions become clear when one stops applying what Lotz calls the "hegemony of linear norms" to evaluations of Netflix.4 These norms have been carried over from the broadcast television era, such as the belief that the goal of programming is to gain the largest audience/ratings, that programming should foster scheduled regular viewing, and that media corporations are trying to channel audiences to particularly favored titles in which the company has a financial stake. The persistence of these norms has obscured understanding of Netflix as a parallel service sitting alongside the traditional television and film industries. As an alternative to these norms, Lotz provides a taxonomy defined by the geographic region, library specificity, library ownership, and corporate ownership of a given service, which when applied reveals the way these platforms craft their subscription propositions.5 By considering these factors, Lotz demonstrates how subscription platforms are designed to create content that facilitates a myriad of desired states of being, like multitasking viewing or comfort viewing, which have parallels in linear television but are foregrounded on digital platforms and become the reliable experiential offerings that ensure that churn—the loss of subscribers—remains low. Lotz [End Page 195] argues that when we look at streaming subscription services, we are looking at entertainment offerings that seem familiar but operate in unique ways. Lotz's work pairs nicely with Mattias Frey's new book Netflix Recommends: Algorithms, Film Choice, and the History of Taste. At first glance, Frey's claim that "there may be more continuity than change in the digital age" seems to adhere to the kind of binary prognostications that Lotz is reacting against, but Frey is no captive to the "hegemony of...
Netflix推荐:马蒂亚斯·弗雷的《算法、电影选择和品味的历史》,以及阿曼达·d·洛茨的《Netflix和流媒体视频:用户资助的视频点播业务》(评论)
由:Netflix推荐:算法,电影选择,和口味的历史由马蒂亚斯·弗雷,和:Netflix和流媒体视频:业务订阅资助的视频点播由阿曼达·d·洛茨伊森·塔西(传记)Netflix推荐:算法,电影选择,和口味的历史由马蒂亚斯·弗雷加州大学出版社。2021。282页。85.00美元的精装书;29.95美元纸;也有电子书版本。Netflix和流媒体视频:订户资助的视频点播业务,Amanda D. Lotz著,Polity出版社,2022。224页。64.95美元的精装书;22.95美元纸;也有电子书版本。2022年春季,Netflix未能实现季度订户预测,随之而来的幸灾乐祸代表了公众对股东大会的异常热烈的反应对于许多观察人士来说,这是流媒体战争(流媒体是订阅流媒体平台之间的竞争的昵称)的一个里程碑式的时刻,这标志着Netflix的迅速崛起可能会减速。十年前,Netflix将其视频租赁公司转型为流媒体平台,打破了媒体行业的现状。在此期间,焦虑的行业旁观者和互联网乌托邦主义者一直想知道新常态意味着什么。在金融投机的推动下,用户增长一直是Netflix成功的衡量标准,但股票估值的下跌使Netflix的重点转向了收入和推出广告支持的二级市场Netflix曾承诺要彻底改变娱乐行业,但对于我们这些还记得流媒体出现之前的时代的人来说,订阅等级和广告中断却出奇地熟悉。Netflix真的改变了媒体行业吗?回答这个问题的是两本关于流媒体公司的新书,它们可以帮助我们评估流媒体时代头十年的影响。最近出版的《Netflix和流媒体视频:用户资助的视频点播业务》一书出自该领域的关键人物之一阿曼达•洛茨之手。在她的职业生涯中,Lotz展示了一种敏锐的能力,通过提供术语、模式和资源来分析数字颠覆、服务的全球扩散以及这些平台的历史先例,使流媒体的浑浊之水变得更加清晰她的最新作品试图纠正几个假设,包括两种相反的观点:在流媒体时代,一切都发生了根本性的变化。相反,洛茨令人信服地认为,流媒体平台,尤其是Netflix,在对连续性和变化进行分类时,必须考虑到其独特的特征。当人们不再将洛茨所说的“线性规范的霸权”应用于netflix的评价时,这些区别就变得清晰起来。4这些规范是从广播电视时代延续下来的,比如认为节目的目标是获得最大的观众/收视率,节目应该促进定期的观看,媒体公司正试图引导观众收看公司有经济利益的特别喜欢的节目。这些规范的持续存在,让人们无法理解Netflix是与传统电视和电影行业并驾齐驱的服务。作为这些规范的替代方案,Lotz提供了一个由地理区域、图书馆特殊性、图书馆所有权和给定服务的公司所有权定义的分类法,当应用时,它揭示了这些平台制定其订阅主张的方式通过考虑这些因素,Lotz展示了订阅平台是如何设计来创造内容,以促进无数理想的存在状态,如多任务观看或舒适观看,这与线性电视有相似之处,但在数字平台上很有前景,并成为可靠的体验产品,确保用户流失率保持在低水平。洛茨认为,当我们关注流媒体订阅服务时,我们关注的是那些看似熟悉但运作方式独特的娱乐产品。洛茨的工作与马蒂亚斯·弗雷的新书《Netflix推荐:算法、电影选择和品味的历史》非常吻合。乍一看,弗雷关于“数字时代的连续性可能比变化更多”的说法似乎与洛茨所反对的那种二元预测相一致,但弗雷并没有被“……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JCMS-Journal of Cinema and Media Studies
JCMS-Journal of Cinema and Media Studies FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信