International Medievalism and Popular Culture ed. by Louise D'arcens and Andrew Lynch (review)

IF 0.5 3区 社会学 0 LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES
{"title":"International Medievalism and Popular Culture ed. by Louise D'arcens and Andrew Lynch (review)","authors":"","doi":"10.1353/art.2023.a910874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: International Medievalism and Popular Culture ed. by Louise D'arcens and Andrew Lynch Kevin J. Harty louise d'arcens and andrew lynch, eds. International Medievalism and Popular Culture. Amherst, NY: Cambria Press, 2022. Pp. xxx, 251 (with 18 b&w illustrations). isbn: 978–1–63857–110–0. $59.95. The paperback reissue of International Medievalism and Popular Culture—first published in hardback in 2014—is significant for three reasons. First, it reminds us that medievalism is now finally a recognized area of rigorous academic inquiry. We have come a long way from when, in the 1960s, 1970s, and 1980s, Leslie J. Workman and Kathleen Verduin had to make the scholarly case that medievalism was something more than the stepchild (or bastard!) of the more serious and important field of medieval studies. Second, the reissue of this collection of essays reminds readers of the important work being done on medievalism by our colleagues in Australia, who contribute all but two of the essays in this volume. And third, these essays by diverse hands remind us of the many ways in which the cultures of the Middle Ages have found expression in the modern and post-modern worlds in Australia and beyond. In their introduction, the editors lay out the argument advanced collectively by the essays in this volume: 'The \"popular Middle Ages\" has travelled a long way from its nationalistic origins, entering a realm in which the labels national, postcolonial, transnational, international, and global all require as much revisitation and renegotiation as that most slippery of all terms, the medieval' (p. xxvi). Clare Monagle follows the introduction with a discussion of how Hedley Bull's The Anarchial Society (1977) and its paradigm for the New Medievalism continue to offer a problematic approach both to theories about international relations and to the ways in which medievalism has been and continues to be used (and misused) in public discourse. Helen Dell next offers an analysis of how and why the Harry Potter franchise infuriated members of the Christian Right and thwarted their attempts to insulate their children from the wider world. Louise D'Arcens moves on to a comparative discussion of how three Ridley Scott films—Kingdom of Heaven (2005), Body of Lies (2008), and the 2010 Robin Hood—are imperfect exercises in defining international and domestic medievalism. In Scott's case, D'Arcens argues, the road to Hell. … John M. Ganim approaches the relationship between the Middle Ages and the Arab Spring though an examination of what he labels 'the built environment of the Islamic world' (p. 59). Using architectural projects funded by the Aga Khan Trust for Culture, Ganim argues that these projects reuse parts of the fabric of medieval Islam, often found in Western discussions of orientalism, for new and not-yet-fully defined purposes. Helen Hickey and Stephanie Trigg document the medievalism appropriated in the nineteenth century by the Australian United Tinsmiths to support their efforts to achieve fair wages and decent working conditions. Karen Hall switches genres in her essay on the medievalism on display in contemporary Australian visual art by Alexia Sinclair, G.W. Bot, Irene Barberis, and Laith McGregor, whose works reflect the 'ability of fragments and traces of the medieval to speak to the present' (p. 119). Nickolas Haydock analyzes the forms of medievalism in Julia Kristeva's 2006 novel Murder in Byzantium and concludes that the novel is a successful, but provocative, attempt to explore the links between the [End Page 106] Crusades and contemporary Western military interventions in the Middle East. Chantal Bourgault du Coudray's essay is a reflection on the character Little Red Riding Hood and the implications across multiple disciplines that the oft retold multi-genre tale of a young girl alone and lost in the forest has. Laurie Ormond's essay serves as both an introduction to contemporary Australian fantasy fiction and an admission that such fiction raises not-easily-answered questions about the vulnerability of women to male sexual violence. The emphasis in these fictional works on female vulnerability can be read as both countering and reinforcing gender stereotypes. Anne McKendry follows with a discussion that argues for the 'Australianness' of William Wallace, William Thatcher, and...","PeriodicalId":43123,"journal":{"name":"Arthuriana","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthuriana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/art.2023.a910874","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reviewed by: International Medievalism and Popular Culture ed. by Louise D'arcens and Andrew Lynch Kevin J. Harty louise d'arcens and andrew lynch, eds. International Medievalism and Popular Culture. Amherst, NY: Cambria Press, 2022. Pp. xxx, 251 (with 18 b&w illustrations). isbn: 978–1–63857–110–0. $59.95. The paperback reissue of International Medievalism and Popular Culture—first published in hardback in 2014—is significant for three reasons. First, it reminds us that medievalism is now finally a recognized area of rigorous academic inquiry. We have come a long way from when, in the 1960s, 1970s, and 1980s, Leslie J. Workman and Kathleen Verduin had to make the scholarly case that medievalism was something more than the stepchild (or bastard!) of the more serious and important field of medieval studies. Second, the reissue of this collection of essays reminds readers of the important work being done on medievalism by our colleagues in Australia, who contribute all but two of the essays in this volume. And third, these essays by diverse hands remind us of the many ways in which the cultures of the Middle Ages have found expression in the modern and post-modern worlds in Australia and beyond. In their introduction, the editors lay out the argument advanced collectively by the essays in this volume: 'The "popular Middle Ages" has travelled a long way from its nationalistic origins, entering a realm in which the labels national, postcolonial, transnational, international, and global all require as much revisitation and renegotiation as that most slippery of all terms, the medieval' (p. xxvi). Clare Monagle follows the introduction with a discussion of how Hedley Bull's The Anarchial Society (1977) and its paradigm for the New Medievalism continue to offer a problematic approach both to theories about international relations and to the ways in which medievalism has been and continues to be used (and misused) in public discourse. Helen Dell next offers an analysis of how and why the Harry Potter franchise infuriated members of the Christian Right and thwarted their attempts to insulate their children from the wider world. Louise D'Arcens moves on to a comparative discussion of how three Ridley Scott films—Kingdom of Heaven (2005), Body of Lies (2008), and the 2010 Robin Hood—are imperfect exercises in defining international and domestic medievalism. In Scott's case, D'Arcens argues, the road to Hell. … John M. Ganim approaches the relationship between the Middle Ages and the Arab Spring though an examination of what he labels 'the built environment of the Islamic world' (p. 59). Using architectural projects funded by the Aga Khan Trust for Culture, Ganim argues that these projects reuse parts of the fabric of medieval Islam, often found in Western discussions of orientalism, for new and not-yet-fully defined purposes. Helen Hickey and Stephanie Trigg document the medievalism appropriated in the nineteenth century by the Australian United Tinsmiths to support their efforts to achieve fair wages and decent working conditions. Karen Hall switches genres in her essay on the medievalism on display in contemporary Australian visual art by Alexia Sinclair, G.W. Bot, Irene Barberis, and Laith McGregor, whose works reflect the 'ability of fragments and traces of the medieval to speak to the present' (p. 119). Nickolas Haydock analyzes the forms of medievalism in Julia Kristeva's 2006 novel Murder in Byzantium and concludes that the novel is a successful, but provocative, attempt to explore the links between the [End Page 106] Crusades and contemporary Western military interventions in the Middle East. Chantal Bourgault du Coudray's essay is a reflection on the character Little Red Riding Hood and the implications across multiple disciplines that the oft retold multi-genre tale of a young girl alone and lost in the forest has. Laurie Ormond's essay serves as both an introduction to contemporary Australian fantasy fiction and an admission that such fiction raises not-easily-answered questions about the vulnerability of women to male sexual violence. The emphasis in these fictional works on female vulnerability can be read as both countering and reinforcing gender stereotypes. Anne McKendry follows with a discussion that argues for the 'Australianness' of William Wallace, William Thatcher, and...
国际中世纪主义和流行文化主编路易丝·达森和安德鲁·林奇(评论)
评议:国际中世纪主义和流行文化主编路易斯·达森斯和安德鲁·林奇凯文·j·哈蒂路易斯·达森斯和安德鲁·林奇,编辑。国际中世纪和流行文化。阿默斯特,纽约州:坎布里亚出版社,2022。第xxx页,251页(附18张黑白插图)。isbn: 978-1-63857-110-0。59.95美元。2014年首次以精装本出版的《国际中世纪主义与流行文化》平装本再版意义重大,原因有三。首先,它提醒我们,中世纪主义现在终于成为一个公认的严谨学术研究领域。在20世纪60年代、70年代和80年代,莱斯利·j·沃克曼(Leslie J. Workman)和凯瑟琳·韦尔都因(Kathleen Verduin)不得不在学术上证明,中世纪主义不仅仅是中世纪研究这个更严肃、更重要领域的继子(或私生子),我们已经走过了漫长的道路。其次,这本文集的再版提醒读者,我们在澳大利亚的同事正在做的关于中世纪的重要工作,他们贡献了本卷中除了两篇文章之外的所有文章。第三,这些不同作者的文章提醒我们,中世纪文化在澳大利亚及其他地区的现代和后现代世界中以多种方式得到表达。在他们的介绍中,编辑们列出了本卷文章集体提出的论点:“‘流行的中世纪’已经从它的民族主义起源走了很长一段路,进入了一个国家、后殖民、跨国、国际和全球等标签都需要重新审视和重新谈判的领域,就像所有术语中最狡猾的一样。克莱尔·莫纳格尔(Clare Monagle)在引言之后,讨论了海德利·布尔(Hedley Bull)的《无政府社会》(1977)及其新中世纪主义范式如何继续为国际关系理论和中世纪主义在公共话语中已经和继续被使用(和误用)的方式提供了一个有问题的方法。海伦·戴尔接下来分析了《哈利·波特》系列是如何以及为什么激怒了基督教右翼成员,并挫败了他们让自己的孩子与更广阔的世界隔绝的努力。Louise D’arcens接着比较讨论了雷德利·斯科特的三部电影——《天国》(2005)、《谎言之身》(2008)和《罗宾汉》(2010)——在定义国际和国内中世纪主义方面是如何不完美的。阿森斯认为,在斯科特的案例中,这是一条通往地狱的道路。约翰·m·加尼姆通过考察他所称的“伊斯兰世界的建筑环境”来探讨中世纪和阿拉伯之春之间的关系(第59页)。利用阿迦汗文化信托基金资助的建筑项目,加尼姆认为,这些项目重新利用了中世纪伊斯兰教的部分结构,这些结构经常出现在西方对东方主义的讨论中,用于新的、尚未完全定义的目的。海伦·希基(Helen Hickey)和斯蒂芬妮·特里格(Stephanie Trigg)记录了19世纪澳大利亚联合铁匠协会(Australian United Tinsmiths)为支持他们争取公平工资和体面工作条件的努力而盗用的中世纪主义。卡伦·霍尔(Karen Hall)在一篇关于当代澳大利亚视觉艺术中展出的中世纪主义的文章中转换了流派,这篇文章由亚历克西亚·辛克莱(Alexia Sinclair)、G.W.博特(G.W. Bot)、艾琳·巴伯里斯(Irene Barberis)和莱斯·麦格雷戈(Laith McGregor)创作,他们的作品反映了“中世纪的碎片和痕迹与现在对话的能力”(第119页)。尼古拉斯·海多克分析了朱莉娅·克里斯蒂娃2006年出版的小说《拜占庭谋杀案》中的中世纪主义形式,并得出结论认为,这部小说在探索十字军东征与当代西方对中东的军事干预之间的联系方面做得很成功,但也很有挑衅性。尚塔尔·布尔戈·杜·库德雷的文章是对小红帽这个角色的反思,以及这个经常被重述的关于一个孤独的小女孩在森林里迷路的多类型故事的多学科含义。劳里·奥蒙德(Laurie Ormond)的文章既是对当代澳大利亚奇幻小说的介绍,也是对这类小说提出了女性易受男性性暴力侵害这一不易回答的问题的承认。这些虚构作品对女性脆弱性的强调可以被解读为对性别刻板印象的反击和强化。安妮·麦肯德里接着讨论了威廉·华莱士、威廉·撒切尔和……的“澳大利亚性”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arthuriana
Arthuriana Multiple-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Arthuriana publishes peer-reviewed, on-line analytical and bibliographical surveys of various Arthurian subjects. You can access these e-resources through this site. The review and evaluation processes for e-articles is identical to that for the print journal . Once accepted for publication, our surveys are supported and maintained by Professor Alan Lupack at the University of Rochester through the Camelot Project.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信