Chevalerie et royauté dans le roman d'Erec de Hartmann von Aue by Patrick Del Luca (review)
IF 0.5
3区 社会学
0 LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES
求助PDF
{"title":"Chevalerie et royauté dans le roman d'Erec de Hartmann von Aue by Patrick Del Luca (review)","authors":"","doi":"10.1353/art.2023.a910875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: Chevalerie et royauté dans le roman d'Erec de Hartmann von Aue by Patrick Del Luca Ann Mccullough patrick del luca, Chevalerie et royauté dans le roman d'Erec de Hartmann von Aue. Paris: Honoré Champion, 2021. Pp. 474. ISBN: 978–2–745–35413–6. €70. It is hardly a straightforward task to describe and explain how Hartmann von Aue reconceives Chrétien de Troyes' Erec et Enide. In his thorough and attentively referenced work, Patrick Del Luca outlines the deconstruction of Chrétien's belle conjointure in favor of a novel coherence of form and theme that the German adapter builds in its place. Del Luca begins with a consideration of the notion of conjointure and an overview of the ways in which Hartmann upends elements of Chrétien's text regarding form, tone, and purpose. Although the author speaks to the concept of conjointure as a system of rapports, repetitions, and connections within Chrétien's text that ensure its coherence and build meaning, readers relatively new to medieval literary study will likely require more guidance on this concept before attempting to fully appreciate Hartmann's transformation and strategic simplification of this aspect of Chrétien's work. Several helpful references concerning conjointure are included in the footnotes. Del Luca specifically outlines elements of the text that demonstrate Hartmann's desire to replace the nuances of Chrétien's conjointure in favor of a more ideologically centered model meant to establish and preserve a Christianized and aristocratic chivalric culture. The scene known as the 'joie de la cour' provides perhaps one of the best examples as the term joie undergoes a slide in meaning. In lieu of Chrétien's sometimes erotic, sometimes ironic use of the word, the joie of Hartmann's narrative takes on a more unambiguous ontological function. Here, joie springs from the knight's integration into harmonious courtly society. Without this joie, as Del Luca explains, no social cohesion—and, therefore, no courtly and aristocratic culture—would be possible. In addition to his ideological goal of forwarding a 'new' chivalry, influenced by Bernard de Clairvaux, that emphasizes empathy and humility, Hartmann has didactic aims, using Erec's exploits to underscore the perils of the destructive, isolating, and irrational type of anger (ira) that leads to gratuitous violence. Hartmann's Erec eventually adopts the humility and compassion inherent to the miles christianus, serving as an exemplar devoid of the psychological complexity and individuality of Chrétien's hero. Del Luca examines Hartmann's more narrow focus on Erec as knight and eventual king, as opposed to Chrétien's attention on the amorous couple. With a more direct focus on Erec as knight and less on other characters and his interactions with them, Hartmann lays the groundwork for a text that takes on the form and function of a miroir des princes. In his reflections on tyranny in the second half of his work, Del Luca discusses the literary genre of the miroir des princes in a manner that is at once accessible and highly detailed, situating it both historically and philosophically. He details numerous instances in which Hartmann underscores the qualities fundamental to the knight while suppressing scenes of conflict and forwarding an image of a more harmonious and idealized courtly life. The author observes that in doing so, Hartmann abandons the bipartite structure in which the hero makes amends and repents at the culmination of the narrative. Rather, the narrative structure is modified to address the long and arduous path that leads to [End Page 108] the throne, a path that requires the shedding of ira and the adoption of selflessness and mercy. Del Luca also explores the question of why Hartmann chose to rework Chrétien's text, even going to far as to alter representations of chivalric society into one grounded in lineage and nobility. Indeed, even as he weaves in issues carrying greater societal implications like those of lineage and Christianization that anticipate an evolution within Arthurian tradition, Hartmann's goal is to deliver a clearer, more instructive narrative in contrast to Chrétien's more stylistically nuanced composition. Ann Mccullough Middle Tennesse State University Copyright © 2023 Arthuriana...","PeriodicalId":43123,"journal":{"name":"Arthuriana","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthuriana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/art.2023.a910875","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
引用
批量引用
Abstract
Reviewed by: Chevalerie et royauté dans le roman d'Erec de Hartmann von Aue by Patrick Del Luca Ann Mccullough patrick del luca, Chevalerie et royauté dans le roman d'Erec de Hartmann von Aue. Paris: Honoré Champion, 2021. Pp. 474. ISBN: 978–2–745–35413–6. €70. It is hardly a straightforward task to describe and explain how Hartmann von Aue reconceives Chrétien de Troyes' Erec et Enide. In his thorough and attentively referenced work, Patrick Del Luca outlines the deconstruction of Chrétien's belle conjointure in favor of a novel coherence of form and theme that the German adapter builds in its place. Del Luca begins with a consideration of the notion of conjointure and an overview of the ways in which Hartmann upends elements of Chrétien's text regarding form, tone, and purpose. Although the author speaks to the concept of conjointure as a system of rapports, repetitions, and connections within Chrétien's text that ensure its coherence and build meaning, readers relatively new to medieval literary study will likely require more guidance on this concept before attempting to fully appreciate Hartmann's transformation and strategic simplification of this aspect of Chrétien's work. Several helpful references concerning conjointure are included in the footnotes. Del Luca specifically outlines elements of the text that demonstrate Hartmann's desire to replace the nuances of Chrétien's conjointure in favor of a more ideologically centered model meant to establish and preserve a Christianized and aristocratic chivalric culture. The scene known as the 'joie de la cour' provides perhaps one of the best examples as the term joie undergoes a slide in meaning. In lieu of Chrétien's sometimes erotic, sometimes ironic use of the word, the joie of Hartmann's narrative takes on a more unambiguous ontological function. Here, joie springs from the knight's integration into harmonious courtly society. Without this joie, as Del Luca explains, no social cohesion—and, therefore, no courtly and aristocratic culture—would be possible. In addition to his ideological goal of forwarding a 'new' chivalry, influenced by Bernard de Clairvaux, that emphasizes empathy and humility, Hartmann has didactic aims, using Erec's exploits to underscore the perils of the destructive, isolating, and irrational type of anger (ira) that leads to gratuitous violence. Hartmann's Erec eventually adopts the humility and compassion inherent to the miles christianus, serving as an exemplar devoid of the psychological complexity and individuality of Chrétien's hero. Del Luca examines Hartmann's more narrow focus on Erec as knight and eventual king, as opposed to Chrétien's attention on the amorous couple. With a more direct focus on Erec as knight and less on other characters and his interactions with them, Hartmann lays the groundwork for a text that takes on the form and function of a miroir des princes. In his reflections on tyranny in the second half of his work, Del Luca discusses the literary genre of the miroir des princes in a manner that is at once accessible and highly detailed, situating it both historically and philosophically. He details numerous instances in which Hartmann underscores the qualities fundamental to the knight while suppressing scenes of conflict and forwarding an image of a more harmonious and idealized courtly life. The author observes that in doing so, Hartmann abandons the bipartite structure in which the hero makes amends and repents at the culmination of the narrative. Rather, the narrative structure is modified to address the long and arduous path that leads to [End Page 108] the throne, a path that requires the shedding of ira and the adoption of selflessness and mercy. Del Luca also explores the question of why Hartmann chose to rework Chrétien's text, even going to far as to alter representations of chivalric society into one grounded in lineage and nobility. Indeed, even as he weaves in issues carrying greater societal implications like those of lineage and Christianization that anticipate an evolution within Arthurian tradition, Hartmann's goal is to deliver a clearer, more instructive narrative in contrast to Chrétien's more stylistically nuanced composition. Ann Mccullough Middle Tennesse State University Copyright © 2023 Arthuriana...
帕特里克·德尔·卢卡的哈特曼·冯·奥伊小说中的骑士与皇室(评论)
帕特里克·德尔卢卡(Patrick Del Luca),《骑士与皇家骑士》(Chevalerie et royaudredans le roman d'Erec de Hartmann von Aue)。巴黎:荣誉冠军,2021年。474页。ISBN: 978-2-745-35413-6。€70。要描述和解释哈特曼·冯·奥埃是如何看待克劳森·德·特鲁瓦的《埃里克与恩德》的,这很难是一件直截了当地的任务。帕特里克·德尔·卢卡(Patrick Del Luca)在其详尽而精心引用的作品中,概述了对chrysamtien的美丽结合的解构,以支持德国适配器在其位置上建立的形式和主题的新颖一致性。Del Luca首先考虑了结合的概念,并概述了Hartmann在形式、语气和目的方面颠覆了chrimasten文本元素的方式。虽然作者谈到了结合的概念,认为它是一种和谐、重复和联系的系统,在chremaden的文本中,确保了它的连贯性和构建意义,但对中世纪文学研究相对较新的读者可能需要更多关于这个概念的指导,才能完全理解哈特曼对chremaden作品这方面的转变和战略简化。脚注中包含了一些有关连词的有用参考资料。德尔·卢卡特别概述了文本的一些元素,这些元素表明哈特曼希望取代chremaden结合的细微差别,以支持一种更以意识形态为中心的模式,旨在建立和维护基督教化和贵族骑士文化。被称为“joie de la cour”的场景可能是“joie”一词含义下滑的最好例子之一。哈特曼的叙述中的欢乐,代替了克雷蒂安对这个词有时是色情的,有时是讽刺的使用,呈现出一种更明确的本体论功能。在这里,快乐源于骑士融入和谐的宫廷社会。正如德尔卢卡所解释的那样,没有这种快乐,就不可能有社会凝聚力,因此也就不可能有宫廷和贵族文化。哈特曼的意识形态目标是发扬一种“新”骑士精神,这种精神受伯纳德·德·克莱沃的影响,强调同理心和谦逊。除此之外,哈特曼还有一个说教的目标,他利用埃里克的行为来强调破坏性、孤立性和非理性的愤怒(ira)的危险,这种愤怒会导致无根据的暴力。哈特曼饰演的埃里克最终继承了迈尔斯·克里斯琴斯固有的谦逊和同情心,成为了一个没有克里斯琴斯汀英雄心理复杂性和个性的典范。德尔·卢卡研究了哈特曼更狭隘地关注埃里克作为骑士和最终的国王,而不是克雷蒂安对这对恩爱夫妻的关注。哈特曼更直接地关注埃里克作为骑士的身份,而不是其他角色以及他与他们的互动,为这部具有王子镜的形式和功能的文本奠定了基础。在他作品的后半部分对暴政的反思中,德尔卢卡以一种既容易理解又非常详细的方式讨论了《王子镜》的文学类型,从历史和哲学的角度来看待它。他详细列举了哈特曼强调骑士的基本品质的许多例子,同时压制了冲突的场景,并转发了一个更和谐和理想化的宫廷生活的形象。作者认为,哈特曼这样做,放弃了主人公在叙事高潮时赎罪和忏悔的二元结构。更确切地说,叙事结构被修改了,以说明通往王座的漫长而艰辛的道路,这条道路需要摆脱ira,采用无私和仁慈。德尔·卢卡还探讨了为什么哈特曼选择重新编写《克雷蒂安》的文本,甚至将骑士社会的表现改变为一种基于血统和贵族的表现。事实上,尽管哈特曼在作品中穿插了一些具有更大社会意义的问题,比如世系和基督教化,这些问题预示着亚瑟王传统的演变,但他的目标是提供一种更清晰、更有启发性的叙事,而不是像《克雷蒂安》那样在风格上更细致入时。版权所有©2023 Arthuriana…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。