{"title":"\"Wandering Free, Wish I Could Be . . .\": Ambition, Art, and Nostalgia in Disney's The Little Mermaid","authors":"Eileen G'Sell","doi":"10.1353/thr.2023.a911585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\"Wandering Free, Wish I Could Be . . .\":Ambition, Art, and Nostalgia in Disney's The Little Mermaid Eileen G'Sell (bio) Look at this trove, treasures untold . . . When Disney's The Little Mermaid was released in November of 1989, I was 10 years old. My sisters were eight, six, and four; we were all duly spellbound, as was much of the entire nation. It was the sixth highest-grossing film of the year, said to launch \"The Disney Renaissance,\" a decade that witnessed no fewer than 10 Disney animated features, including The Lion King, which made more money than any traditionally animated film before (or since). I did not know at the time that The Little Mermaid was the film to reanimate Walt's waning empire, but I sensed it—from the spate of \"Part of Your World\" talent show solos to the sold-out Sebastian Christmas ornaments at the local McDonald's. No longer, I thought, would I wonder where all the marvelous fairy-tale movies had gone—the ones like Snow White, Cinderella, or Sleeping Beauty, the ones in which a stunning first soprano leads a dangerous life in a magical forest or castle, the ones with a dazzling female villain who upstages her virtuous prey, the ones that came out decades before I was born. I gravitated to fairy-tale narratives—both in the library and the video store—largely because they featured female protagonists who were beautiful, impeccably dressed, and endured dramatic suffering. These were the same reasons, notably, that I took to certain entries in the sumptuously illustrated A Picture Book of Saints in which Saint Cecilia and Saint Dorothy were my favorites. (Would I prefer to be beheaded or tortured on a wheel?) If someone had asked if I sought to emulate the docile benevolence of either saint or princess, I surely would have been befuddled. Nothing about these women's behavior had anything to do with me. I aspired to their sheen, their grit, their glamor. Plus, the idea that I would ever lead a life half as exciting seemed far-fetched indeed. How many wonders can one cavern hold? Enter The Little Mermaid. Vying for my attention with Don Bluth's All Dogs Go to Heaven (a conviction I already deeply held), released the same weekend, The Little Mermaid sated my appetite for polychromatic splendor [End Page 159] and sartorial novelty (hoop skirts and body-skimming sequins), plus piqued my erotic curiosity for female nudity. (In one shot, Ariel's naughty bits are barely concealed by subaqueous shadow and bubble.) Even better, Ariel, like me, was rather bored by her surroundings; she was rebellious, daring, and playful. She had more personality than all the older princesses combined. One could even say she paved the way for Millennials' prioritization of experience over materialism (\"but who cares . . . no big deal,\" she claims of her thingamabobs). Ariel's shameless ogling of Prince Eric was also about as sex-positive as a Disney movie gets; her gaze mattered more than any other character's, even as she herself was the creation of a male-dominated artistic team. No doubt, Ariel's decision to forfeit her voice for a shot at romance was, and is, an issue (never mind that it was a fundamental plot point to Andersen's original tale, said to be based on his own experience giving his only admirable feature, his \"voice,\" to an aristocratic man he was enamored of via a series of love letters never requited). As are, arguably, Ariel's porntastic body (less is made of how Eric is also quite the conventional snack) and swift marriage at the end (one has to admit, her hair pops against a bridal veil). Still, it feels plausible that Ariel could land a guy based only on looks and good humor. Is this the ideal message for one's daughters (and sons)? Of course not. But at the same time, at the time, the movie was progress. The Little Mermaid was also the last full-length animated Disney film comprised of hand-inked and painted cels. That means that every frame was hand-drawn and colored by an artist—dozens and dozens of artists...","PeriodicalId":485043,"journal":{"name":"The Hopkins Review","volume":"377 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Hopkins Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/thr.2023.a911585","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
"Wandering Free, Wish I Could Be . . .":Ambition, Art, and Nostalgia in Disney's The Little Mermaid Eileen G'Sell (bio) Look at this trove, treasures untold . . . When Disney's The Little Mermaid was released in November of 1989, I was 10 years old. My sisters were eight, six, and four; we were all duly spellbound, as was much of the entire nation. It was the sixth highest-grossing film of the year, said to launch "The Disney Renaissance," a decade that witnessed no fewer than 10 Disney animated features, including The Lion King, which made more money than any traditionally animated film before (or since). I did not know at the time that The Little Mermaid was the film to reanimate Walt's waning empire, but I sensed it—from the spate of "Part of Your World" talent show solos to the sold-out Sebastian Christmas ornaments at the local McDonald's. No longer, I thought, would I wonder where all the marvelous fairy-tale movies had gone—the ones like Snow White, Cinderella, or Sleeping Beauty, the ones in which a stunning first soprano leads a dangerous life in a magical forest or castle, the ones with a dazzling female villain who upstages her virtuous prey, the ones that came out decades before I was born. I gravitated to fairy-tale narratives—both in the library and the video store—largely because they featured female protagonists who were beautiful, impeccably dressed, and endured dramatic suffering. These were the same reasons, notably, that I took to certain entries in the sumptuously illustrated A Picture Book of Saints in which Saint Cecilia and Saint Dorothy were my favorites. (Would I prefer to be beheaded or tortured on a wheel?) If someone had asked if I sought to emulate the docile benevolence of either saint or princess, I surely would have been befuddled. Nothing about these women's behavior had anything to do with me. I aspired to their sheen, their grit, their glamor. Plus, the idea that I would ever lead a life half as exciting seemed far-fetched indeed. How many wonders can one cavern hold? Enter The Little Mermaid. Vying for my attention with Don Bluth's All Dogs Go to Heaven (a conviction I already deeply held), released the same weekend, The Little Mermaid sated my appetite for polychromatic splendor [End Page 159] and sartorial novelty (hoop skirts and body-skimming sequins), plus piqued my erotic curiosity for female nudity. (In one shot, Ariel's naughty bits are barely concealed by subaqueous shadow and bubble.) Even better, Ariel, like me, was rather bored by her surroundings; she was rebellious, daring, and playful. She had more personality than all the older princesses combined. One could even say she paved the way for Millennials' prioritization of experience over materialism ("but who cares . . . no big deal," she claims of her thingamabobs). Ariel's shameless ogling of Prince Eric was also about as sex-positive as a Disney movie gets; her gaze mattered more than any other character's, even as she herself was the creation of a male-dominated artistic team. No doubt, Ariel's decision to forfeit her voice for a shot at romance was, and is, an issue (never mind that it was a fundamental plot point to Andersen's original tale, said to be based on his own experience giving his only admirable feature, his "voice," to an aristocratic man he was enamored of via a series of love letters never requited). As are, arguably, Ariel's porntastic body (less is made of how Eric is also quite the conventional snack) and swift marriage at the end (one has to admit, her hair pops against a bridal veil). Still, it feels plausible that Ariel could land a guy based only on looks and good humor. Is this the ideal message for one's daughters (and sons)? Of course not. But at the same time, at the time, the movie was progress. The Little Mermaid was also the last full-length animated Disney film comprised of hand-inked and painted cels. That means that every frame was hand-drawn and colored by an artist—dozens and dozens of artists...
“自由漫游,希望我能……”:迪斯尼电影《小美人鱼》中的野心、艺术和怀旧情怀艾琳·格塞尔(传记)看看这个宝藏,数不清的宝藏……1989年11月迪士尼的《小美人鱼》上映时,我才10岁。我的三个妹妹分别是八岁、六岁和四岁;我们全都如痴如醉,整个国家的许多人也是如此。这是今年票房第六高的电影,据说它开启了“迪士尼复兴”,这十年见证了不下10部迪士尼动画电影,包括《狮子王》(the Lion King),它比之前(或之后)任何一部传统动画电影都赚得多。当时我并不知道《小美人鱼》会让华特日渐衰落的电影帝国复活,但我感觉到了——从《你的世界》(Part of Your World)才艺表演的独唱,到当地麦当劳售罄的塞巴斯蒂安圣诞饰品,我都能感觉到。我想,我再也不用担心那些精彩的童话电影都到哪里去了——那些像《白雪公主》、《灰姑娘》、《睡美人》这样的,那些令人惊叹的女高音在魔法森林或城堡里过着危险的生活的,那些有一个耀眼的女反派抢了她善良的猎物的风头的,那些在我出生前几十年就出现的。我被童话故事所吸引——无论是在图书馆还是在音像店——很大程度上是因为它们的女主角都很漂亮,穿着无可挑剔,忍受着戏剧性的痛苦。值得注意的是,这也是我喜欢《圣徒图画书》(A Picture Book of Saints)中某些条目的原因,其中我最喜欢的是圣塞西莉亚和圣多萝西。(我是想被砍头,还是在车轮上受折磨?)如果有人问我是否试图效仿圣人或公主的善良,我肯定会感到困惑。这些女人的行为跟我一点关系都没有。我渴望他们的光辉,他们的勇气,他们的魅力。此外,我的生活有一半如此刺激的想法似乎真的很牵强。一个洞穴能承载多少奇迹?小美人鱼登场了。与同一周末上映的唐·布鲁斯(Don Bluth)的《狗都上天堂》(All Dogs Go to Heaven)争夺我的注意力(我已经深深相信了这一点),《小美人鱼》满足了我对多色华丽和服装新奇(箍裙和紧身亮片)的胃口,还激起了我对女性裸体的性欲。(在一个镜头中,阿里尔顽皮的部分几乎被水下的阴影和气泡所掩盖。)更妙的是,爱丽儿和我一样,对周围的环境感到厌烦;她叛逆、大胆、顽皮。她比所有的老公主加起来都更有个性。人们甚至可以说,她为千禧一代优先考虑体验而不是物质主义铺平了道路(“但谁在乎……“没什么大不了的,”她声称她的东西。阿里尔无耻地向埃里克王子抛媚眼,这也是迪士尼电影中最积极的性行为;她的目光比其他任何角色都重要,尽管她本人是一个男性主导的艺术团队的产物。毫无疑问,爱丽儿为了追求浪漫而放弃声音的决定过去是,现在也是一个问题(不要介意这是安徒生最初故事的一个基本情节点,据说安徒生的故事是基于他自己的经历,他把他唯一令人钦佩的特征——他的“声音”——献给了一个他通过一系列从未得到回报的情书而迷恋的贵族男人)。就像,可以说,阿里尔的色情身体(更少的是埃里克也是传统小吃)和结尾的快速婚姻(不得不承认,她的头发在新娘的面纱上突出)。尽管如此,阿里尔还是有可能只凭长相和幽默就找到一个男人。这是给女儿(和儿子)的理想信息吗?当然不是。但与此同时,这部电影也在进步。《小美人鱼》也是最后一部由手绘和彩绘单元组成的全长动画迪士尼电影。这意味着每一帧都是由艺术家手绘和上色的——几十个艺术家……