Psychometric Evaluation of the Turkish Version of the Three-Domain Disgust Scale in Obsessive Compulsive Disorder and Non-Clinical Samples

IF 0.8 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Esengul EKICI, Kadir OZDEL
{"title":"Psychometric Evaluation of the Turkish Version of the Three-Domain Disgust Scale in Obsessive Compulsive Disorder and Non-Clinical Samples","authors":"Esengul EKICI, Kadir OZDEL","doi":"10.24193/jebp.2023.2.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Three-Domain Disgust Scale (TDDS) contains three subscales assessing disgust sensitivity that may contribute to research on developing and maintaining psychopathology and treating psychopathologies related to disgust. This study aimed to adapt and evaluate the psychometric properties of the TDDS Turkish version. Two hundred and thirty-six participants responded to the scale consisting of 131 individuals with Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD) and consisting of 105 non-clinical samples. Confirmatory Factor Analyses (CFAs) and multigroup CFAs were performed to evaluate the factor structure and the measurement invariance across clinically disordered TDDS. Reliability analyses were calculated with Cronbach’s alpha and a one-month retest. Besides, the convergent and discriminant validity of the TDDS were examined with the Beck Depression Inventory, Disgust Scale-Revised, Guilt Inventory, and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. The study found that the three-factor structure of the TDDS was the best fit for the data, with high item-factor loadings, which proved invariant across clinically disordered. Convergent and discriminative validity of the TDDS was provided, and the reliability analysis results were satisfactory (all ≥ 0.70) in two samples. The TDDS presented high cross- language replicability and seemed an effective instrument for research in Turkish adults.","PeriodicalId":43042,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Evidence-Based Psychotherapies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Evidence-Based Psychotherapies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24193/jebp.2023.2.12","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Three-Domain Disgust Scale (TDDS) contains three subscales assessing disgust sensitivity that may contribute to research on developing and maintaining psychopathology and treating psychopathologies related to disgust. This study aimed to adapt and evaluate the psychometric properties of the TDDS Turkish version. Two hundred and thirty-six participants responded to the scale consisting of 131 individuals with Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD) and consisting of 105 non-clinical samples. Confirmatory Factor Analyses (CFAs) and multigroup CFAs were performed to evaluate the factor structure and the measurement invariance across clinically disordered TDDS. Reliability analyses were calculated with Cronbach’s alpha and a one-month retest. Besides, the convergent and discriminant validity of the TDDS were examined with the Beck Depression Inventory, Disgust Scale-Revised, Guilt Inventory, and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. The study found that the three-factor structure of the TDDS was the best fit for the data, with high item-factor loadings, which proved invariant across clinically disordered. Convergent and discriminative validity of the TDDS was provided, and the reliability analysis results were satisfactory (all ≥ 0.70) in two samples. The TDDS presented high cross- language replicability and seemed an effective instrument for research in Turkish adults.
强迫症和非临床样本中土耳其版三域厌恶量表的心理测量学评价
三域厌恶量表(TDDS)包含三个评估厌恶敏感性的子量表,这可能有助于研究与厌恶相关的精神病理学的发展和维持以及治疗精神病理学。本研究的目的是适应和评估土耳其版的TDDS的心理测量特性。236名参与者对131名强迫症患者(OCD)和105个非临床样本组成的量表做出了回应。采用验证性因素分析(CFAs)和多组验证性因素分析(CFAs)来评估临床紊乱TDDS的因素结构和测量不变性。信度分析采用Cronbach’s alpha和一个月的复测计算。此外,采用Beck抑郁量表、厌恶量表、内疚量表和状态-特质焦虑量表检验了TDDS的收敛效度和判别效度。研究发现,TDDS的三因子结构最适合数据,具有较高的项目因子负荷,在临床疾病中证明不变。TDDS具有收敛效度和判别效度,两个样本的信度分析结果均令人满意(均≥0.70)。TDDS具有较高的跨语言可复制性,似乎是土耳其成年人研究的有效工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: The journal is devoted to the advancement of the clinical theory and practice of evidence-based psychotherapies (EBP) (e.g., evidence-based psychological assessments, evidence-based psychological treatments). The journal publishes original papers dealing with EBP and psychology, psychiatry, the medical and mental specialties, and allied areas of science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信