Design For All

Carina Dantas, Juliana Louceiro, Luís Dias, Alice Moreira, Veronika Kotradyová, Zuzana Čerešňová, Michal Kacej, Natália Filová, Mária Šimková, María Sánchez, Ľubica Voľanská, Soňa G. Lutherová, Dean Lipovac, Matic Sašek, Nejc Šarabon, Nastja Podrekar
{"title":"Design For All","authors":"Carina Dantas, Juliana Louceiro, Luís Dias, Alice Moreira, Veronika Kotradyová, Zuzana Čerešňová, Michal Kacej, Natália Filová, Mária Šimková, María Sánchez, Ľubica Voľanská, Soňa G. Lutherová, Dean Lipovac, Matic Sašek, Nejc Šarabon, Nastja Podrekar","doi":"10.37947/ipbe.2023.vol3.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The average age of the European population has been increasing and this fact leads to the need of adapting the physical spaces, so that older adults may stay independent for as long as possible. To that aim, building constructors, furnishing designers but also social care and health sectors need to be aware of the difficulties that older adults face in their homes and in public spaces. Design for All, Universal Design and Smart Healthy Age-Friendly Environments are approaches that build and promote more inclusive spaces to everyone, regardless of their gender, age, ethnicity or functional limitations. The present study aims to identify the needs and gaps in different educational levels, concerning D4All and Universal Design, in four European countries (Portugal, Slovenia, Slovakia and Spain), as well as survey the needs of stakeholders. With that purpose, desk research, interviews and workshop sessions were conducted, allowing to build a Matrix of Gaps, comparing the approach to these topics in four educational fields: Architecture, Design, Health, and Social care. Results show differences among the countries, but also that these topics are not sufficiently addressed in formal curricula, highlighting the need for this to be changed in the near future.","PeriodicalId":491950,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary perspectives on the built environment","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary perspectives on the built environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37947/ipbe.2023.vol3.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The average age of the European population has been increasing and this fact leads to the need of adapting the physical spaces, so that older adults may stay independent for as long as possible. To that aim, building constructors, furnishing designers but also social care and health sectors need to be aware of the difficulties that older adults face in their homes and in public spaces. Design for All, Universal Design and Smart Healthy Age-Friendly Environments are approaches that build and promote more inclusive spaces to everyone, regardless of their gender, age, ethnicity or functional limitations. The present study aims to identify the needs and gaps in different educational levels, concerning D4All and Universal Design, in four European countries (Portugal, Slovenia, Slovakia and Spain), as well as survey the needs of stakeholders. With that purpose, desk research, interviews and workshop sessions were conducted, allowing to build a Matrix of Gaps, comparing the approach to these topics in four educational fields: Architecture, Design, Health, and Social care. Results show differences among the countries, but also that these topics are not sufficiently addressed in formal curricula, highlighting the need for this to be changed in the near future.
为所有人设计
欧洲人口的平均年龄一直在增长,这一事实导致需要调整物理空间,以便老年人可以尽可能长时间地保持独立。为此,建筑建筑商、家具设计师以及社会护理和卫生部门都需要意识到老年人在家中和公共场所面临的困难。面向所有人的设计、通用设计和智能健康的老年人友好环境是为每个人建立和促进更具包容性的空间的方法,无论其性别、年龄、种族或功能限制如何。本研究旨在确定四个欧洲国家(葡萄牙、斯洛文尼亚、斯洛伐克和西班牙)关于D4All和通用设计的不同教育水平的需求和差距,并调查利益相关者的需求。为此,开展了桌面研究、访谈和研讨会,建立了差距矩阵,比较了建筑、设计、健康和社会关怀四个教育领域的这些主题的方法。结果显示了各国之间的差异,但也表明这些主题在正式课程中没有得到充分的讨论,突出表明在不久的将来需要改变这种情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信