Evaluation of Socket Preservation Using Collagen Plug and Injectable Platelet Rich Fibrin in Extracted Sockets of Mandibular Molars: A Split Mouth Study

Ganesh Sai Sandeep Kumar, Ganesh Sai Sandeep Kumar, L. Krishna Prasad, P. Srinivas Chakravarthi, P. Raja Satish, Anand Vijay S, Vidya Sagar B, K. S. Deekshith
{"title":"Evaluation of Socket Preservation Using Collagen Plug and Injectable Platelet Rich Fibrin in Extracted Sockets of Mandibular Molars: A Split Mouth Study","authors":"Ganesh Sai Sandeep Kumar, Ganesh Sai Sandeep Kumar, L. Krishna Prasad, P. Srinivas Chakravarthi, P. Raja Satish, Anand Vijay S, Vidya Sagar B, K. S. Deekshith","doi":"10.31487/j.dobcr.2023.02.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim and Objectives: Evaluation of socket preservation using collagen plug and injectable platelet rich fibrin in extracted sockets of mandibular molars. To evaluate wound healing and bone density using collagen plug and I-PRF and to compare wound healing and bone density between collagen plug and I-PRF. Methodology: This experimental study involves 13 healthy patients at the Sibar Institute of Dental Sciences and Hospital in Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India, who underwent mandibular molar extraction under local anesthesia. Patients underwent clinical and radio-graphic examinations and received periodontal treatment. The study involved extraction of right and left mandibular molar teeth, AbGel placement, collagen plug placement, and sockets secured with sutures and pressure packs. Postoperative pain, swelling, and wound healing were assessed using Wong-Baker faces pain rating scale, VAS scale, and LANDRY healing index. CBCT was obtained after 1 month and 3 months after extraction for bone quality assessment. Results: In the study, there were 69.2% men and 30.8% women. According to the study, 14.3% of individuals in the collagen plug group and 85.7% of those who received injectable platelet-rich fibrin experienced very good wound healing. On the first and seventh days, the mean pain intensity was lower in the injectable group, but there was not a noticeable distinction between the groups. The injectable group had the lowest swelling score, but by day seven, it had dramatically decreased. At the third month, the collagen plug group had the highest bone density readings, with no discernible difference between the groups. Conclusion: It can be concluded that I-PRF can be utilized as an alternative to collagen plug.","PeriodicalId":72781,"journal":{"name":"Dental Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31487/j.dobcr.2023.02.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim and Objectives: Evaluation of socket preservation using collagen plug and injectable platelet rich fibrin in extracted sockets of mandibular molars. To evaluate wound healing and bone density using collagen plug and I-PRF and to compare wound healing and bone density between collagen plug and I-PRF. Methodology: This experimental study involves 13 healthy patients at the Sibar Institute of Dental Sciences and Hospital in Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India, who underwent mandibular molar extraction under local anesthesia. Patients underwent clinical and radio-graphic examinations and received periodontal treatment. The study involved extraction of right and left mandibular molar teeth, AbGel placement, collagen plug placement, and sockets secured with sutures and pressure packs. Postoperative pain, swelling, and wound healing were assessed using Wong-Baker faces pain rating scale, VAS scale, and LANDRY healing index. CBCT was obtained after 1 month and 3 months after extraction for bone quality assessment. Results: In the study, there were 69.2% men and 30.8% women. According to the study, 14.3% of individuals in the collagen plug group and 85.7% of those who received injectable platelet-rich fibrin experienced very good wound healing. On the first and seventh days, the mean pain intensity was lower in the injectable group, but there was not a noticeable distinction between the groups. The injectable group had the lowest swelling score, but by day seven, it had dramatically decreased. At the third month, the collagen plug group had the highest bone density readings, with no discernible difference between the groups. Conclusion: It can be concluded that I-PRF can be utilized as an alternative to collagen plug.
下颌磨牙拔牙槽内胶原塞和可注射富血小板纤维蛋白保存牙槽的评价:一项裂口研究
目的和目的:评价胶原塞和可注射富血小板纤维蛋白在下颌磨牙牙槽中保存牙槽的效果。应用胶原塞和I-PRF评价创面愈合和骨密度,比较胶原塞和I-PRF的创面愈合和骨密度。方法:本实验研究涉及印度安得拉邦Guntur市Sibar牙科科学研究所和医院的13名健康患者,他们在局部麻醉下进行了下颌磨牙拔牙手术。患者接受了临床和影像学检查,并接受了牙周治疗。该研究包括左右下颌磨牙的拔除,AbGel放置,胶原蛋白塞放置,缝合和压包固定牙槽。采用Wong-Baker面部疼痛评定量表、VAS评分和LANDRY愈合指数评估术后疼痛、肿胀和伤口愈合情况。拔牙后1个月和3个月分别行CBCT检查,评估骨质量。结果:男性占69.2%,女性占30.8%。根据这项研究,14.3%的胶原蛋白塞组患者和85.7%接受注射富血小板纤维蛋白的患者伤口愈合良好。在第1天和第7天,注射组的平均疼痛强度较低,但组间无明显差异。注射组的肿胀评分最低,但到第7天,肿胀评分显著下降。在第三个月时,胶原蛋白塞组的骨密度读数最高,两组之间没有明显的差异。结论:I-PRF可作为胶原蛋白塞的替代材料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信