Our Machinic Inheritance Review of Inhabited Machines: Genealogy of an Architectural Concept , by Moritz Gleich, Basel, Birkhäuser, 2023, 416 pp. ISBN: 9783035623765.

IF 0.2 4区 艺术学 0 ARCHITECTURE
Aleksandr Bierig
{"title":"Our Machinic Inheritance <b> <i>Review of Inhabited Machines: Genealogy of an Architectural Concept</i> </b> , by Moritz Gleich, Basel, Birkhäuser, 2023, 416 pp. ISBN: 9783035623765.","authors":"Aleksandr Bierig","doi":"10.1080/13264826.2023.2265205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Notes1 Walter Johnson, Soul by Soul: Life inside the Antebellum Slave Market (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999), 188.2 Revealing the mechanical laws of nature also constituted a claim to authority, one which also aimed to replace the arbitrariness of personal rule and, later, religious decree with the certainty of measured replication. This is a vast topic, but I am thinking here of the helpful summary provided in Margaret C. Jacob and Larry Stewart, Practical Matter: Newton’s Science in the Service of Industry and Empire, 1687–1851 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004). See also: Otto Mayr, Authority, Liberty, and Automatic Machinery in Early Modern Europe (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1986); Horst Bredekamp, The Lure of Antiquity and the Cult of the Machine: The Kunstkammer and the Evolution of Nature, Art, and Technology (Princeton, NJ: Markus Wiener Publishers, 1995). One should remember, in this context, that Bentham’s Panopticon; or, Inspection House (1791) was not a design for a prison, but rather imagined itself as an all-purpose mechanical architecture whose design could also be deployed for asylums, hospitals, workhouses, schools. Any place, in short, where discipline was needed.3 Kiel Moe, “The Equipmental Tradition: Architecture’s Environmental Pedagogies,” in Environmental Histories of Architecture, ed. Kim Förster (Montreal: Canadian Centre for Architecture, 2022), 4.1–4.17. See also: Michael Osman, Modernism’s Visible Hand: Architecture and Regulation in America (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2018), 1–43.4 On the conceptual step change introduced by steam power, see: John Tresch, The Romantic Machine: Utopian Science and Technology after Napoleon (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012); Andreas Malm, Fossil Capital: The Rise of Steam-Power and the Roots of Global Warming (London: Verso, 2016).5 Dolores Greenberg, “Energy, Power, and Perceptions of Social Change in the Early Nineteenth Century,” American Historical Review 95, no. 3 (1990): 693–714.6 Bernhard Siegert, “Doors: On the Materiality of the Symbolic,” trans. John Durham Peters, Grey Room 47 (2012): 6–23.7 Christophe Bonneuil and Jean-Baptiste Fressoz, The Shock of the Anthropocene: The Earth, History and Us, trans. David Fernbach (London: Verso, 2017), 116.8 Peter Collins, Changing Ideals in Modern Architecture, 1750–1950 (Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 1998), 166.9 Collins, Changing Ideals in Modern Architecture, 166.","PeriodicalId":43786,"journal":{"name":"Architectural Theory Review","volume":"186 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Architectural Theory Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13264826.2023.2265205","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Notes1 Walter Johnson, Soul by Soul: Life inside the Antebellum Slave Market (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999), 188.2 Revealing the mechanical laws of nature also constituted a claim to authority, one which also aimed to replace the arbitrariness of personal rule and, later, religious decree with the certainty of measured replication. This is a vast topic, but I am thinking here of the helpful summary provided in Margaret C. Jacob and Larry Stewart, Practical Matter: Newton’s Science in the Service of Industry and Empire, 1687–1851 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004). See also: Otto Mayr, Authority, Liberty, and Automatic Machinery in Early Modern Europe (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1986); Horst Bredekamp, The Lure of Antiquity and the Cult of the Machine: The Kunstkammer and the Evolution of Nature, Art, and Technology (Princeton, NJ: Markus Wiener Publishers, 1995). One should remember, in this context, that Bentham’s Panopticon; or, Inspection House (1791) was not a design for a prison, but rather imagined itself as an all-purpose mechanical architecture whose design could also be deployed for asylums, hospitals, workhouses, schools. Any place, in short, where discipline was needed.3 Kiel Moe, “The Equipmental Tradition: Architecture’s Environmental Pedagogies,” in Environmental Histories of Architecture, ed. Kim Förster (Montreal: Canadian Centre for Architecture, 2022), 4.1–4.17. See also: Michael Osman, Modernism’s Visible Hand: Architecture and Regulation in America (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2018), 1–43.4 On the conceptual step change introduced by steam power, see: John Tresch, The Romantic Machine: Utopian Science and Technology after Napoleon (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012); Andreas Malm, Fossil Capital: The Rise of Steam-Power and the Roots of Global Warming (London: Verso, 2016).5 Dolores Greenberg, “Energy, Power, and Perceptions of Social Change in the Early Nineteenth Century,” American Historical Review 95, no. 3 (1990): 693–714.6 Bernhard Siegert, “Doors: On the Materiality of the Symbolic,” trans. John Durham Peters, Grey Room 47 (2012): 6–23.7 Christophe Bonneuil and Jean-Baptiste Fressoz, The Shock of the Anthropocene: The Earth, History and Us, trans. David Fernbach (London: Verso, 2017), 116.8 Peter Collins, Changing Ideals in Modern Architecture, 1750–1950 (Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 1998), 166.9 Collins, Changing Ideals in Modern Architecture, 166.
我们对居住机器的机械继承评论:建筑概念的谱系,Moritz Gleich,巴塞尔,Birkhäuser, 2023, 416页。ISBN: 9783035623765。
注1沃尔特·约翰逊:《灵魂对灵魂:战前奴隶市场的生活》(马萨诸塞州剑桥:哈佛大学出版社,1999年),188.2揭示自然的机械规律也构成了对权威的要求,其目的也在于取代个人统治的任意性,以及后来的宗教法令,以测量复制的确定性。这是一个广泛的话题,但我在这里想到玛格丽特·c·雅各布和拉里·斯图尔特在《实用问题:牛顿的科学为工业和帝国服务,1687-1851》(剑桥,马萨诸塞州:哈佛大学出版社,2004)中提供的有益总结。参见:奥托迈尔,权威,自由,和自动机械在近代早期欧洲(巴尔的摩,马里兰州:约翰霍普金斯大学出版社,1986年);霍斯特·布莱德坎普,《古代的诱惑和机器的崇拜:艺术与自然、艺术和技术的进化》(普林斯顿,新泽西:马库斯·维纳出版社,1995)。在这种情况下,我们应该记住,边沁的圆形监狱;或者,Inspection House(1791)不是为监狱设计的,而是把自己想象成一个多功能的机械建筑,其设计也可以用于收容所、医院、济贫院和学校。总之,任何需要纪律的地方Kiel Moe,“设备传统:建筑的环境教育学”,载于《建筑环境史》,Kim主编Förster(蒙特利尔:加拿大建筑中心,2022),4.1-4.17。参见:Michael Osman,《现代主义的有形之手:美国的建筑与法规》(明尼阿波利斯:明尼苏达大学出版社,2018),1-43.4关于蒸汽动力引入的概念阶梯变化,参见:John Tresch,《浪漫机器:拿破仑之后的乌托邦科学与技术》(芝加哥:芝加哥大学出版社,2012);4 .《化石资本:蒸汽动力的崛起和全球变暖的根源》(伦敦:Verso, 2016)多洛雷斯·格林伯格,《十九世纪早期的能源、权力和社会变革的感知》,《美国历史评论》95期,第2期。[6]张志刚,《门:论象征的物质性》,译。《人类世的冲击:地球、历史与我们》,约翰·达勒姆·彼得斯,灰色房间47(2012):6-23.7。David Fernbach(伦敦:Verso, 2017), 116.8 Peter Collins,《改变现代建筑的理想,1750-1950》(蒙特利尔:麦吉尔-女王大学出版社,1998),166.9 Collins,《改变现代建筑的理想》,166。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信