Analysis of Students’ Mathematical Self-Efficacy Instruments Using Rasch Model

Ahmad Mukhibin, Husnul Khatimah Rusyid, Ahmad Lutfi, Tatang Herman, Dwi Arianti Suryo Utomo
{"title":"Analysis of Students’ Mathematical Self-Efficacy Instruments Using Rasch Model","authors":"Ahmad Mukhibin, Husnul Khatimah Rusyid, Ahmad Lutfi, Tatang Herman, Dwi Arianti Suryo Utomo","doi":"10.31002/ijome.v6i2.994","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to determine the quality of mathematics self-efficacy instruments in terms of validity, reliability, undimensionality, ability distribution, and suitability of student responses. Data were obtained by distributing mathematics self-efficacy instruments consisting of 20 statements to 45 seventh-grade students of a private junior high school in Yogyakarta, Indonesia, at the 2022/2023 school year selected through purposive random sampling technique. The data were analyzed using Rasch model with the help of the Ministep application. The results of the analysis showed that the mathematics self-efficacy instrument used was declared valid, with an outfit Z standardized (outfit ZSTD) value of -0.16 for respondents and 0.20 for items, and could be used to measure students' mathematics self-efficacy level with a reliability level reaching a score of 0.54 or in the medium category. The results of the distribution of item abilities show that most students admit to having the fighting power to solve problems that occur, especially in learning mathematics. From the analysis of the suitability of student responses, 18 statements show the suitability between the level of self-efficacy and the responses given by students. While two other statements did not show suitability. Therefore, teachers or other academics can use the self-efficacy questionnaire that has been prepared by researchers because it has met the four criteria for testing instruments.","PeriodicalId":492390,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Journal of Mathematics Education","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Journal of Mathematics Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31002/ijome.v6i2.994","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the quality of mathematics self-efficacy instruments in terms of validity, reliability, undimensionality, ability distribution, and suitability of student responses. Data were obtained by distributing mathematics self-efficacy instruments consisting of 20 statements to 45 seventh-grade students of a private junior high school in Yogyakarta, Indonesia, at the 2022/2023 school year selected through purposive random sampling technique. The data were analyzed using Rasch model with the help of the Ministep application. The results of the analysis showed that the mathematics self-efficacy instrument used was declared valid, with an outfit Z standardized (outfit ZSTD) value of -0.16 for respondents and 0.20 for items, and could be used to measure students' mathematics self-efficacy level with a reliability level reaching a score of 0.54 or in the medium category. The results of the distribution of item abilities show that most students admit to having the fighting power to solve problems that occur, especially in learning mathematics. From the analysis of the suitability of student responses, 18 statements show the suitability between the level of self-efficacy and the responses given by students. While two other statements did not show suitability. Therefore, teachers or other academics can use the self-efficacy questionnaire that has been prepared by researchers because it has met the four criteria for testing instruments.
学生数学自我效能量表的Rasch模型分析
摘要本研究旨在探讨数学自我效能量表的效度、信度、无量纲性、能力分布和学生反应的适宜性。采用有目的随机抽样的方法,在2022/2023学年向印尼日惹市一所私立初中的45名七年级学生发放数学自我效能感量表,共包含20个语句。利用Rasch模型和Ministep软件对数据进行分析。分析结果表明,所使用的数学自我效能量表是有效的,被调查者的装备Z标准化(装备ZSTD)值为-0.16,项目的装备ZSTD值为0.20,可用于测量学生的数学自我效能水平,信度水平达到0.54分或中等水平。项目能力分布的结果表明,大多数学生承认自己有解决问题的能力,特别是在学习数学方面。从学生回答的适宜性分析来看,18个陈述显示了自我效能水平与学生给出的回答之间的适宜性。而其他两种说法则不适合。因此,教师或其他学者可以使用研究人员准备的自我效能感问卷,因为它满足了测试工具的四个标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信