A legitimacy‐based view of the impact of government venture capital on startup innovation: Evidence from a transition economy

IF 5.4 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Ramakrishna Devarakonda, Aqi Liu
{"title":"A legitimacy‐based view of the impact of government venture capital on startup innovation: Evidence from a transition economy","authors":"Ramakrishna Devarakonda, Aqi Liu","doi":"10.1002/sej.1485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Research Summary This study examines the role of government venture capital (GVC) on startup innovation in a transition economy context. Drawing on institutional theory, we advance a contextual view of GVC by proposing that GVC positively impacts the innovation of startups in transition economies by serving as a sociocognitive legitimating endorsement. Furthermore, our study offers a contingent framework by showing that GVC endorsement will be more meaningful for startups deficient in organizational sources of legitimacy, such as political ties and social prestige. Regression analyses using a longitudinal data of Chinese venture‐backed biopharma and medical device startups founded during 2002–2017 offer broad support for our theory about the sociocognitive legitimating role of GVC in transition economy contexts. Managerial Summary We explore the role of government venture capital (GVC) in promoting startup innovation within transition economies. In such contexts, where startups often face skepticism and legitimacy issues, our research reveals that GVC can play a crucial role by providing socio‐cognitive legitimacy. Our study suggests that this “state backing” enables transition economy startups to gain the trust of external knowledge resource holders, enhancing their innovation prospects. Our findings emphasize the significance of GVC as a means of active government intervention for fostering startup innovation, especially for startups deficient in other avenues of legitimacy. This insight is valuable for entrepreneurs and policymakers in transition economy contexts.","PeriodicalId":51417,"journal":{"name":"Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal","volume":"47 12","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1485","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Research Summary This study examines the role of government venture capital (GVC) on startup innovation in a transition economy context. Drawing on institutional theory, we advance a contextual view of GVC by proposing that GVC positively impacts the innovation of startups in transition economies by serving as a sociocognitive legitimating endorsement. Furthermore, our study offers a contingent framework by showing that GVC endorsement will be more meaningful for startups deficient in organizational sources of legitimacy, such as political ties and social prestige. Regression analyses using a longitudinal data of Chinese venture‐backed biopharma and medical device startups founded during 2002–2017 offer broad support for our theory about the sociocognitive legitimating role of GVC in transition economy contexts. Managerial Summary We explore the role of government venture capital (GVC) in promoting startup innovation within transition economies. In such contexts, where startups often face skepticism and legitimacy issues, our research reveals that GVC can play a crucial role by providing socio‐cognitive legitimacy. Our study suggests that this “state backing” enables transition economy startups to gain the trust of external knowledge resource holders, enhancing their innovation prospects. Our findings emphasize the significance of GVC as a means of active government intervention for fostering startup innovation, especially for startups deficient in other avenues of legitimacy. This insight is valuable for entrepreneurs and policymakers in transition economy contexts.
政府风险投资对创业创新影响的合法性视角:来自转型经济的证据
摘要本研究考察了转型经济背景下政府风险投资(GVC)在创业创新中的作用。借鉴制度理论,我们提出全球价值链作为一种社会认知合法化背书,对转型经济体中初创企业的创新产生积极影响,从而提出了全球价值链的语境观。此外,我们的研究提供了一个偶然的框架,表明全球价值链的支持对于缺乏组织合法性来源(如政治关系和社会声望)的初创公司更有意义。利用2002-2017年间成立的中国风险投资生物制药和医疗器械初创企业的纵向数据进行回归分析,为我们关于全球价值链在转型经济背景下的社会认知合法化作用的理论提供了广泛的支持。我们探讨了政府风险投资(GVC)在促进转型经济体创业创新中的作用。在这样的背景下,创业公司经常面临质疑和合法性问题,我们的研究表明,全球价值链可以通过提供社会认知合法性发挥关键作用。研究表明,这种“国家支持”使转型经济初创企业获得外部知识资源持有者的信任,增强了其创新前景。我们的研究结果强调了全球价值链作为一种积极的政府干预手段对促进创业创新的重要性,特别是对于缺乏其他合法途径的创业公司。这种见解对转型经济背景下的企业家和政策制定者很有价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
1.60%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: The Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal is a research journal that publishes original work recommended by a developmental, double-blind review process conducted by peer scholars. Strategic entrepreneurship involves innovation and subsequent changes which add value to society and which change societal life in ways which have significant, sustainable, and durable consequences. The SEJ is international in scope and acknowledges theory- and evidence-based research conducted and/or applied in all regions of the world. It is devoted to content and quality standards based on scientific method, relevant theory, tested or testable propositions, and appropriate data and evidence, all replicable by others, and all representing original contributions. The SEJ values contributions which lead to improved practice of managing organizations as they deal with the entrepreneurial process involving imagination, insight, invention, and innovation and the inevitable changes and transformations that result and benefit society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信