Fiscal Pedal: Fraud or Creative Accounting? A Theoretical Understanding of the Dangerous Fiscal Cycles that Affected the Brazilian Economy

Q2 Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Jeremias Pereira da Silva Arraes, José Matias-Pereira, João Abreu Faria Bilhim
{"title":"Fiscal Pedal: Fraud or Creative Accounting? A Theoretical Understanding of the Dangerous Fiscal Cycles that Affected the Brazilian Economy","authors":"Jeremias Pereira da Silva Arraes, José Matias-Pereira, João Abreu Faria Bilhim","doi":"10.5539/ijef.v15n12p16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay aims to discuss, in a theoretical way, how creative accounting is presented in Brazil in the years 2014 and 2015, which resulted in an impeachment process and affected the Brazilian economy. The methodology is qualitative with the application of content and document analysis techniques. The basis of the accounting information is taken from the analyzes of the special impeachment commission and the Federal Court of Auditors in relation to the accusation of a crime of fiscal responsibility to the detriment of the president of the republic. The research discusses the accounting operations carried out by the government and which resulted in the famous expression “fiscal pedaling”. In light of accounting theory Hendriksen and Van Breda (2018), there is a complexity in the analysis that has led to frequent divergences regarding the objectives of accounting and the nature of the economic environment in which it operates. Thus, as research results, it is possible to observe that the concepts given to creative accounting and fraud are close, but they are not similar, where characteristics such as intentional error and the transit of accounting operations, outside the accounting regulations and principles, end up elucidating the particularities of each phenomenon.","PeriodicalId":37166,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Economics and Finance Studies","volume":"7 7","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Economics and Finance Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5539/ijef.v15n12p16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This essay aims to discuss, in a theoretical way, how creative accounting is presented in Brazil in the years 2014 and 2015, which resulted in an impeachment process and affected the Brazilian economy. The methodology is qualitative with the application of content and document analysis techniques. The basis of the accounting information is taken from the analyzes of the special impeachment commission and the Federal Court of Auditors in relation to the accusation of a crime of fiscal responsibility to the detriment of the president of the republic. The research discusses the accounting operations carried out by the government and which resulted in the famous expression “fiscal pedaling”. In light of accounting theory Hendriksen and Van Breda (2018), there is a complexity in the analysis that has led to frequent divergences regarding the objectives of accounting and the nature of the economic environment in which it operates. Thus, as research results, it is possible to observe that the concepts given to creative accounting and fraud are close, but they are not similar, where characteristics such as intentional error and the transit of accounting operations, outside the accounting regulations and principles, end up elucidating the particularities of each phenomenon.
财政踏板:欺诈还是虚构的会计?对影响巴西经济的危险财政周期的理论理解
本文旨在以理论的方式讨论2014年和2015年巴西如何呈现创造性会计,这导致了弹劾程序并影响了巴西经济。该方法是定性的,应用了内容分析和文献分析技术。会计信息的基础来自特别弹劾委员会和联邦审计法院对损害共和国总统财政责任罪指控的分析。本研究探讨了政府进行的会计操作,并由此产生了著名的“财政踩踏板”(fiscal蹬踏板)这一说法。根据会计理论Hendriksen和Van Breda(2018),分析中存在复杂性,导致会计目标和其运作的经济环境的性质经常出现分歧。因此,作为研究结果,我们可以观察到,创造性会计和欺诈的概念是接近的,但它们并不相似,在会计法规和原则之外,故意错误和会计业务转移等特征最终阐明了每种现象的特殊性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Economics and Finance Studies
International Journal of Economics and Finance Studies Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信