Performance of Disc and Chisel Ploughs and their Effects on Some Soil Physical Properties

Omer A. Abdalla, Ahmed Elmahi M. Elmahi, Sirelkhatim K. Abbouda
{"title":"Performance of Disc and Chisel Ploughs and their Effects on Some Soil Physical Properties","authors":"Omer A. Abdalla, Ahmed Elmahi M. Elmahi, Sirelkhatim K. Abbouda","doi":"10.53332/uofkjas.v23i1.1819","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A study was carried out at the University of KhartoumDemonstration Farm in (2007), to study the performance of two tillageimplements: (disc and chisel plough) and their effect on some soilphysical properties. The results showed that the higher values of boththeoretical and effective field capacities were recorded by chisel plough(1.23 ha/hr and 0.90 ha/hr) as compared to disc plough (0.63 ha/hr and0.50 ha/hr). The higher field efficiency was recorded by disc plough(79.37%) as compared to the chisel plough (73.4%). The fuel consumedwhen using the disc plough was (10.60 l/ha) less than that consumed bythe chisel (13.47 l/ha). Tractor wheel slippages ware found to be 10.92%.and 14.1%. The result also showed that both ploughs decreased the soilbulk density values from 1.54 g/cm3 to 1.51 and 1.49 g/cm3 by disc andchisel plough respectively. Particle density was not affected (P > 0.05) byboth implements . The soil porosity values were also increased for bothimplements. The soil moisture content recorded in two depths 0-15 and15-30 cm were higher for chisel plough (6.53% and 6.9%) as compared todisc plough which recorded 6.3% and 6.5% respectively. The infiltrationrate obtained by the disc plough was 22.2 cm/hr while that of chiselplough was (20.1 cm/hr).","PeriodicalId":474410,"journal":{"name":"Maǧallaẗ ǧāmi’aẗ al-H̲arṭūm li-l-’ulūm al-zirā’iyyaẗ","volume":"112 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maǧallaẗ ǧāmi’aẗ al-H̲arṭūm li-l-’ulūm al-zirā’iyyaẗ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53332/uofkjas.v23i1.1819","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A study was carried out at the University of KhartoumDemonstration Farm in (2007), to study the performance of two tillageimplements: (disc and chisel plough) and their effect on some soilphysical properties. The results showed that the higher values of boththeoretical and effective field capacities were recorded by chisel plough(1.23 ha/hr and 0.90 ha/hr) as compared to disc plough (0.63 ha/hr and0.50 ha/hr). The higher field efficiency was recorded by disc plough(79.37%) as compared to the chisel plough (73.4%). The fuel consumedwhen using the disc plough was (10.60 l/ha) less than that consumed bythe chisel (13.47 l/ha). Tractor wheel slippages ware found to be 10.92%.and 14.1%. The result also showed that both ploughs decreased the soilbulk density values from 1.54 g/cm3 to 1.51 and 1.49 g/cm3 by disc andchisel plough respectively. Particle density was not affected (P > 0.05) byboth implements . The soil porosity values were also increased for bothimplements. The soil moisture content recorded in two depths 0-15 and15-30 cm were higher for chisel plough (6.53% and 6.9%) as compared todisc plough which recorded 6.3% and 6.5% respectively. The infiltrationrate obtained by the disc plough was 22.2 cm/hr while that of chiselplough was (20.1 cm/hr).
圆盘犁和凿犁的性能及其对土壤某些物理性质的影响
2007年在喀土穆大学示范农场开展了一项研究,研究两种耕作工具(圆盘犁和凿子犁)的性能及其对某些土壤物理性质的影响。结果表明,凿子犁的理论和有效田间容量分别为1.23和0.90 ha/hr,高于圆盘犁(0.63和0.50 ha/hr)。圆盘犁的田间效率(79.37%)高于凿子犁(73.4%)。圆盘犁的燃料消耗量(10.60 l/ha)低于凿子的燃料消耗量(13.47 l/ha)。拖拉机车轮打滑率为10.92%。和14.1%。结果还表明,圆盘犁和凿子犁分别使土壤容重值从1.54 g/cm3降低到1.51和1.49 g/cm3。颗粒密度不受影响(P >0.05)。两种工具的土壤孔隙度值也有所增加。在0 ~ 15 cm和15 ~ 30 cm两个深度,凿子犁的土壤含水量分别为6.53%和6.9%,高于圆盘犁的6.3%和6.5%。圆盘犁的渗透速率为22.2 cm/hr,而凿子犁的渗透速率为20.1 cm/hr。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信