Lessons learned from the development of a national registry on dementia care and support based on linked national health and administrative data

IF 2.6 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Iris van der Heide, Anneke L. Francke, Carola Döpp, Marianne Heins, Hein P. J. van Hout, Robert A. Verheij, Karlijn J. Joling
{"title":"Lessons learned from the development of a national registry on dementia care and support based on linked national health and administrative data","authors":"Iris van der Heide,&nbsp;Anneke L. Francke,&nbsp;Carola Döpp,&nbsp;Marianne Heins,&nbsp;Hein P. J. van Hout,&nbsp;Robert A. Verheij,&nbsp;Karlijn J. Joling","doi":"10.1002/lrh2.10392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>This paper provides insight into the development of the Dutch Dementia Care and Support Registry and the lessons that can be learned from it. The aim of this Registry was to contribute to quality improvement in dementia care and support.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This paper describes how the Registry was set up in four stages, reflecting the four FAIR principles: the selection of data sources (Findability); obtaining access to the selected data sources (Accessibility); data linkage (Interoperability); and the reuse of data (Reusability).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The linkage of 16 different data sources, including national routine health and administrative data appeared to be technically and legally feasible. The linked data in the Registry offers rich information about (the use of) care for persons with dementia across various healthcare settings, including but not limited to primary care, secondary care, long-term care and medication use, that cannot be obtained from single data sources.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>A key lesson learned is that in order to reuse the data for quality improvement in practice, it is essential to involve healthcare professionals in setting up the Registry and to guide them in the interpretation of the data.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":43916,"journal":{"name":"Learning Health Systems","volume":"8 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lrh2.10392","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning Health Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lrh2.10392","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

This paper provides insight into the development of the Dutch Dementia Care and Support Registry and the lessons that can be learned from it. The aim of this Registry was to contribute to quality improvement in dementia care and support.

Methods

This paper describes how the Registry was set up in four stages, reflecting the four FAIR principles: the selection of data sources (Findability); obtaining access to the selected data sources (Accessibility); data linkage (Interoperability); and the reuse of data (Reusability).

Results

The linkage of 16 different data sources, including national routine health and administrative data appeared to be technically and legally feasible. The linked data in the Registry offers rich information about (the use of) care for persons with dementia across various healthcare settings, including but not limited to primary care, secondary care, long-term care and medication use, that cannot be obtained from single data sources.

Conclusions

A key lesson learned is that in order to reuse the data for quality improvement in practice, it is essential to involve healthcare professionals in setting up the Registry and to guide them in the interpretation of the data.

基于关联的国家健康和行政数据建立痴呆症护理和支持国家登记册的经验教训
引言 本文深入探讨了荷兰痴呆症护理和支持登记处的发展历程,以及从中可以汲取的经验教训。该登记处的目的是促进痴呆症护理和支持质量的提高。 方法 本文介绍了如何分四个阶段建立登记处,反映了 FAIR 的四项原则:选择数据源(可查找性);获取所选数据源的访问权限(可访问性);数据链接(互操作性);以及数据重用(可重用性)。 结果 16 个不同数据源(包括国家常规卫生和行政数据)的链接在技术上和法律上似乎都是可行的。注册表中的链接数据提供了有关痴呆症患者在不同医疗环境中(使用)护理的丰富信息,包括但不限于初级护理、二级护理、长期护理和药物使用,这些信息是无法从单一数据源中获得的。 结论 一条重要的经验是,为了在实践中重复使用数据以提高质量,必须让医护专业人员参与建立登记册,并指导他们解读数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Learning Health Systems
Learning Health Systems HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
22.60%
发文量
55
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信