Raising research possibilities on Fintechs from the SME’s Innovation Management and Penrose Firm Growth theory approaches

Luís Filippe Serpe, Ana Paula Mussi Szabo Cherobim
{"title":"Raising research possibilities on Fintechs from the SME’s Innovation Management and Penrose Firm Growth theory approaches","authors":"Luís Filippe Serpe, Ana Paula Mussi Szabo Cherobim","doi":"10.7867/1980-4431.2022v27n3p22-42","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The emergence of Fintechs as competitors in the financial industry has created a debate concerning their ability to compete with traditional banking institutions. There is the advantage of using virtual platforms, which makes possible to reach a wider public. Fintechs deal with investors and other stakeholders, with innovation, differing from traditional institutions. Also, they face threats that come from frauds and regulation issues. So, to propose ways to study fintechs, this article aims to build research questions and possible topics for future studies in fintechs, using as basis the Innovation Management and Penrose’s Theory of Firm Growth. The methodology used was a literature review with documental analysis, in the form of essay, describing two theoretical axes, in order to find connection between the theories. According to Bense (1947), the essay discusses the development of new theories and studies, focusing on the object and finding different views. The objectives were achieved, making possible to present research questions from the theories. The findings showed that there is an incipient connection between both theories, where few studies point to the possibility of explaining the behavior of small firms (fintechs) using elements from both theories. This research is limited by the scope, to focus on an specific type of firm (fintech), and by the difficulty in establish parameters for the selection of representative works in each field. The novelty in this paper is to propose the use of these theories as basis for a new approach in the study of fintechs.","PeriodicalId":498311,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Negócios","volume":"82 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Negócios","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7867/1980-4431.2022v27n3p22-42","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The emergence of Fintechs as competitors in the financial industry has created a debate concerning their ability to compete with traditional banking institutions. There is the advantage of using virtual platforms, which makes possible to reach a wider public. Fintechs deal with investors and other stakeholders, with innovation, differing from traditional institutions. Also, they face threats that come from frauds and regulation issues. So, to propose ways to study fintechs, this article aims to build research questions and possible topics for future studies in fintechs, using as basis the Innovation Management and Penrose’s Theory of Firm Growth. The methodology used was a literature review with documental analysis, in the form of essay, describing two theoretical axes, in order to find connection between the theories. According to Bense (1947), the essay discusses the development of new theories and studies, focusing on the object and finding different views. The objectives were achieved, making possible to present research questions from the theories. The findings showed that there is an incipient connection between both theories, where few studies point to the possibility of explaining the behavior of small firms (fintechs) using elements from both theories. This research is limited by the scope, to focus on an specific type of firm (fintech), and by the difficulty in establish parameters for the selection of representative works in each field. The novelty in this paper is to propose the use of these theories as basis for a new approach in the study of fintechs.
从中小企业创新管理和彭罗斯企业成长理论的视角提升金融科技研究的可能性
金融科技公司作为金融行业竞争者的出现,引发了一场关于它们与传统银行机构竞争能力的辩论。使用虚拟平台有一个优势,它可以接触到更广泛的公众。与传统机构不同,金融科技公司通过创新与投资者和其他利益相关者打交道。此外,他们还面临来自欺诈和监管问题的威胁。因此,本文旨在以创新管理和彭罗斯的企业成长理论为基础,构建未来金融科技研究的研究问题和可能的主题,以提出研究金融科技的途径。使用的方法是文献回顾与文献分析,在文章的形式,描述两个理论轴,以找到理论之间的联系。根据Bense(1947)的观点,本文讨论了新的理论和研究的发展,关注对象,寻找不同的观点。目标已经实现,这使得从理论中提出研究问题成为可能。研究结果表明,这两种理论之间存在一种初步的联系,很少有研究指出使用两种理论中的元素来解释小企业(金融科技)行为的可能性。这项研究受到范围的限制,专注于特定类型的公司(金融科技),并且难以建立每个领域代表性作品的选择参数。本文的新颖之处在于提出使用这些理论作为研究金融科技的新方法的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信