{"title":"Eating Well/Well Eaten: Lot’s Wife’s Folly and the Wisdom of Salt in <i>Cleanness</i>","authors":"Jamie C. Fumo","doi":"10.1080/10412573.2023.2228150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In attributing the punishment of Lot’s wife to a culinary misuse of salt, the Cleanness-poet evinces salt’s potential as a vexed and unstable signifier in medieval cultural discourse. Far from clarifying the workings of divine justice, the poet’s rationale for Lot’s wife’s punishment actually exposes the inconsistencies of her story in its moral setting. Cleanness deviates from the predominantly favorable coding of salt in the Bible and in various medieval social and intellectual domains, where it was associated with sacrifice and covenant as well as preservation, table-fellowship, and prudence. Building on Derrida’s concept of hostipitality, this article investigates how salt figures in Cleanness’s consideration of the hostility or coercion latent within rituals of commensality, through which the Christian collective is modeled. Furthermore, I propose that the fate of Lot’s wife as saltlick establishes “the eater eaten” as a topos that adds piquancy to Cleanness’s many homiletic representations of feasting, from the Wedding Feast to Baltazar’s banquet. By destabilizing the exemplary structures Lot’s wife’s punishment traditionally buttresses, the backstory of salt points instead to the uncanny as a route into the poem’s subtle deconstruction of commensality.","PeriodicalId":43692,"journal":{"name":"Exemplaria-Medieval Early Modern Theory","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exemplaria-Medieval Early Modern Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10412573.2023.2228150","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In attributing the punishment of Lot’s wife to a culinary misuse of salt, the Cleanness-poet evinces salt’s potential as a vexed and unstable signifier in medieval cultural discourse. Far from clarifying the workings of divine justice, the poet’s rationale for Lot’s wife’s punishment actually exposes the inconsistencies of her story in its moral setting. Cleanness deviates from the predominantly favorable coding of salt in the Bible and in various medieval social and intellectual domains, where it was associated with sacrifice and covenant as well as preservation, table-fellowship, and prudence. Building on Derrida’s concept of hostipitality, this article investigates how salt figures in Cleanness’s consideration of the hostility or coercion latent within rituals of commensality, through which the Christian collective is modeled. Furthermore, I propose that the fate of Lot’s wife as saltlick establishes “the eater eaten” as a topos that adds piquancy to Cleanness’s many homiletic representations of feasting, from the Wedding Feast to Baltazar’s banquet. By destabilizing the exemplary structures Lot’s wife’s punishment traditionally buttresses, the backstory of salt points instead to the uncanny as a route into the poem’s subtle deconstruction of commensality.
期刊介绍:
The first issue of Exemplaria, with an article by Jacques Le Goff, was published in 1989. Since then the journal has established itself as one of the most consistently interesting and challenging periodicals devoted to Medieval and Renaissance studies. Providing a forum for different terminologies and different approaches, it has included symposia and special issues on teaching Chaucer, women, history and literature, rhetoric, medieval noise, and Jewish medieval studies and literary theory. The Times Literary Supplement recently included a review of Exemplaria and said that "it breaks into new territory, while never compromising on scholarly quality".