PROBLEMATIKA HUKUM ATAS PERJANJIAN KERJA SAMA ANTARA BANK DENGAN NOTARIS DI INDONESIA: PERSPEKTIF TEORI KEADILAN BERMARTABAT

Charles Njuka Amah
{"title":"PROBLEMATIKA HUKUM ATAS PERJANJIAN KERJA SAMA ANTARA BANK DENGAN NOTARIS DI INDONESIA: PERSPEKTIF TEORI KEADILAN BERMARTABAT","authors":"Charles Njuka Amah","doi":"10.33592/jsh.v19i02.3366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The legal problems of cooperation agreements between Banks and Notaries in Indonesia are actions or acts that injure human dignity. Notaries have a dominant position over their clients, so they have the potential to side with certain banks or developers. Even though notaries have a prohibition according to the Notary Code of Ethics Article 4 paragraph (4), the obligation to act impartially Article 16 paragraph (1) letter (a) UUJN. This research is a normative juridical research using statutory approach (Statute Approach) and Conceptual Approach. The results of the study found that the notary could potentially be negligent in respecting human dignity by having a cooperation agreement or becoming a bank partner or any other refined terminology, as if that could be justified, even though it is not in accordance with the values ​​or legal principles and values ​​of the Indonesian people. So that if there are actions that are inappropriate among notaries which are then not oriented towards fulfilling human dignity and have the potential for a dispute to occur which can harm other parties, then dignified justice can be a reference in making decisions, both by the Indonesian Notary Association Organization, the Honorary Council Notary and court.
 Keywords: Notary Public servant; Dominant; and Dignified Justice.
","PeriodicalId":498765,"journal":{"name":"Supremasi Hukum (Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Syekh Yusuf)","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Supremasi Hukum (Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Syekh Yusuf)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33592/jsh.v19i02.3366","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The legal problems of cooperation agreements between Banks and Notaries in Indonesia are actions or acts that injure human dignity. Notaries have a dominant position over their clients, so they have the potential to side with certain banks or developers. Even though notaries have a prohibition according to the Notary Code of Ethics Article 4 paragraph (4), the obligation to act impartially Article 16 paragraph (1) letter (a) UUJN. This research is a normative juridical research using statutory approach (Statute Approach) and Conceptual Approach. The results of the study found that the notary could potentially be negligent in respecting human dignity by having a cooperation agreement or becoming a bank partner or any other refined terminology, as if that could be justified, even though it is not in accordance with the values ​​or legal principles and values ​​of the Indonesian people. So that if there are actions that are inappropriate among notaries which are then not oriented towards fulfilling human dignity and have the potential for a dispute to occur which can harm other parties, then dignified justice can be a reference in making decisions, both by the Indonesian Notary Association Organization, the Honorary Council Notary and court. Keywords: Notary Public servant; Dominant; and Dignified Justice.
印尼银行与公证人签订合作协议的法律问题:尊重公正理论的观点
印度尼西亚银行和公证人之间合作协议的法律问题是损害人的尊严的行为。公证人对其客户具有主导地位,因此他们有可能站在某些银行或开发商一边。尽管公证员有根据《公证员道德守则》第4条第4款禁止的义务,但公证员有义务按照第16条第1款(a)项行事。本研究是一项运用法定方法(Statute approach)和概念方法(Conceptual approach)的规范性法学研究。研究的结果发现,公证人有可能因签订合作协议或成为银行合伙人或任何其他精炼的术语而疏忽尊重人的尊严,尽管这并不符合印度尼西亚人民的价值观或法律原则和价值观。因此,如果公证人之间存在不适当的行为,而这些行为并不是为了实现人类尊严,并且有可能发生可能伤害其他各方的争议,那么印度尼西亚公证协会组织、荣誉委员会公证人和法院都可以在做出决定时参考有尊严的司法。关键词:公证员;占主导地位的;尊严正义&# # #;
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信