The hypotension caused by intravenous paracetamol in septic shock patients: A single center placebo controlled randomized study

Ayah Khalil, Ahmed Mukhtar, Ahmed Lotfy, Karima Abu EL-Fotuh, Zeinab Zalat
{"title":"The hypotension caused by intravenous paracetamol in septic shock patients: A single center placebo controlled randomized study","authors":"Ayah Khalil, Ahmed Mukhtar, Ahmed Lotfy, Karima Abu EL-Fotuh, Zeinab Zalat","doi":"10.21608/aijpms.2023.221239.1223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": According to the product information for parenteral paracetamol, fewer than 1% of patients will have more severe adverse effects like hypotension. However, a number of studies suggest that the prevalence of hypotension caused by parenteral paracetamol may be higher than actually thought by the drug's producers. We carried out prospective, controlled, randomized research to compare the clinical implications of intravenous paracetamol bolus versus intravenous paracetamol extended infusion. The 61 adult septic shock patients were divided into three groups by randomization: Bolus group who received paracetamol 1g/100ml infused over 15 minutes, while the extended infusion group who received paracetamol 1g/100ml infused over three hours. The control group who received normal saline 100ml infused over 15 minutes. The main outcome was the incidence and prevalence of reduced blood pressure, which was detected by a systolic blood pressure drop of ≥ 20 ٪ from baseline. Mean arterial pressure, vasopressor infusion flow rate, and both diastolic and systolic blood pressure did not change significantly according to statistical analysis between the three groups at baseline, one, three, or six hours after the intervention. The incidence of hypotension was 19% (4 of 21 patients) within the control or normal saline group, 50% (10 of 20 patients) within the bolus group, and 35% (7 of 20) within the extended infusion group. The prevalence of hypotensive episodes was greater in the bolus group, even though there was no clinically meaningful difference between intravenous paracetamol prolonged infusion and bolus. We do not need to administer paracetamol as a prolonged infusion to prevent the hemodynamics parameter from being negatively impacted.","PeriodicalId":481938,"journal":{"name":"Azhar International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Medical Sciences (Print)","volume":"136 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Azhar International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Medical Sciences (Print)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/aijpms.2023.221239.1223","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: According to the product information for parenteral paracetamol, fewer than 1% of patients will have more severe adverse effects like hypotension. However, a number of studies suggest that the prevalence of hypotension caused by parenteral paracetamol may be higher than actually thought by the drug's producers. We carried out prospective, controlled, randomized research to compare the clinical implications of intravenous paracetamol bolus versus intravenous paracetamol extended infusion. The 61 adult septic shock patients were divided into three groups by randomization: Bolus group who received paracetamol 1g/100ml infused over 15 minutes, while the extended infusion group who received paracetamol 1g/100ml infused over three hours. The control group who received normal saline 100ml infused over 15 minutes. The main outcome was the incidence and prevalence of reduced blood pressure, which was detected by a systolic blood pressure drop of ≥ 20 ٪ from baseline. Mean arterial pressure, vasopressor infusion flow rate, and both diastolic and systolic blood pressure did not change significantly according to statistical analysis between the three groups at baseline, one, three, or six hours after the intervention. The incidence of hypotension was 19% (4 of 21 patients) within the control or normal saline group, 50% (10 of 20 patients) within the bolus group, and 35% (7 of 20) within the extended infusion group. The prevalence of hypotensive episodes was greater in the bolus group, even though there was no clinically meaningful difference between intravenous paracetamol prolonged infusion and bolus. We do not need to administer paracetamol as a prolonged infusion to prevent the hemodynamics parameter from being negatively impacted.
感染性休克患者静脉注射扑热息痛引起的低血压:一项单中心安慰剂对照随机研究
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信