{"title":"Unlikely Angel: The Songs of Dolly Parton by Lydia R. Hamessley (review)","authors":"Annie Janeiro Randall","doi":"10.1353/wam.2023.a912258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: Unlikely Angel: The Songs of Dolly Parton by Lydia R. Hamessley Annie Janeiro Randall Unlikely Angel: The Songs of Dolly Parton. By Lydia R. Hamessley. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2020. 312 pp. Unlikely Angel succeeds in its aim to focus on Dolly Parton’s music and creative process rather than the caricatured elements that have dogged the artist’s public persona since the start of her career ca. 1960. Lydia R. Hamessley’s book is a thoroughgoing response to the dilemma described in the opening paragraph by Dolly’s producer, Steve Buckingham: “Over the decades Dolly and I sometimes talked about how the ‘cartoon’ she had created (her word not mine) often overshadowed her talent as a songwriter and musician. We always strove to put the music first” (Foreword). Unlikely Angel plants its flag firmly on “the music first” and maintains sharp focus on the songs for each of the book’s 286 pages yet also addresses Dolly Parton’s clear-eyed relationship to the cartoon, revealing her agency in deploying it commercially while using it as a shield to protect her imaginative world. Hamessley scored a rare coup for an academic by securing Parton’s participation in the book. Thus supported by the artist herself in the form of extensive, tape-recorded answers to the author’s written questions, Hamessley guides us expertly on a journey to, and through, Dolly’s musical imagination. She creates the term “Dolly’s Songwriting Workshop” to represent the imagined “place” where Dolly goes to create her songs; the conceit is effective on many levels, mainly because it spotlights the serious work behind Dolly Parton’s songwriting craft, something that has been glaringly absent from most journalistic writing about her music. We learn, in close detail, what goes on in Dolly’s workshop through careful examination of representative works drawn from the more than 3,000 songs and 450 recordings that Parton has created in her long career. We begin to grasp the reasons for her career’s extraordinary longevity: Parton’s persistent return to the musical well of her Appalachian heritage and her ability to extract material of astonishingly broad appeal from it. Her cross-cultural fan base is witness to this fact. Indeed, very few singer-songwriters have maintained a loyal fan base and international appeal for six decades. Hamessley takes us through the workshop with a mass of carefully curated materials that include contextualized discussions of songs, multiple listening guides, notated examples, and harmonic and melodic analyses. These crisp pedagogical elements display the author’s abundant expertise; fans need not fear that their beloved music will emerge diminished at the end of a reductionist critique. Dolly’s enthusiastic participation in the project would seem to further guarantee it. Steve Buckingham, too, contributes commentary and has allowed Hamessley to publish studio notes and producers’ handwritten lead sheets that provide an insider’s perspective on Dolly’s recording sessions. Dolly’s responses to Hamessley’s queries add rich detail to the defining feature of her life and art: her Appalachian heritage and musical community in [End Page 106] rural Tennessee. Chapters 3 and 4 trace her upbringing’s influence on her distinctive musical imagination and unique voice. Dolly provides what amounts to a fascinating personal “core repertory” when asked to list influential tunes from her childhood (57). It is also in these foundational chapters that Hamessley examines the misguided “Elizabethan” discourse around Dolly’s “mountain voice.” While Dolly connects her mountain identity and voice to “Celtic music from Scotland, Ireland, England, and Wales” (91), critics have overlain this with an Elizabethan veneer of which Hamessley writes, “They make both category and history errors when they misunderstand Dolly’s Appalachian heritage as Elizabethan, using this misnomer that has been attached to Appalachia for over a century” (91). Boom. Hamessley moves on from this intriguing topic quickly, yet by raising it she invites readers to consider pop/folk music critics’ construction of an idealized, frozen-intime Appalachia—a place where preindustrial British Isles culture remains pure and untouched by outside influences. By quoting Buckingham (“I never heard the word Elizabethan come out of her mouth” [91]), Hamessley effectively attributes this discourse solely...","PeriodicalId":40563,"journal":{"name":"Women and Music-A Journal of Gender and Culture","volume":"2010 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women and Music-A Journal of Gender and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/wam.2023.a912258","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Reviewed by: Unlikely Angel: The Songs of Dolly Parton by Lydia R. Hamessley Annie Janeiro Randall Unlikely Angel: The Songs of Dolly Parton. By Lydia R. Hamessley. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2020. 312 pp. Unlikely Angel succeeds in its aim to focus on Dolly Parton’s music and creative process rather than the caricatured elements that have dogged the artist’s public persona since the start of her career ca. 1960. Lydia R. Hamessley’s book is a thoroughgoing response to the dilemma described in the opening paragraph by Dolly’s producer, Steve Buckingham: “Over the decades Dolly and I sometimes talked about how the ‘cartoon’ she had created (her word not mine) often overshadowed her talent as a songwriter and musician. We always strove to put the music first” (Foreword). Unlikely Angel plants its flag firmly on “the music first” and maintains sharp focus on the songs for each of the book’s 286 pages yet also addresses Dolly Parton’s clear-eyed relationship to the cartoon, revealing her agency in deploying it commercially while using it as a shield to protect her imaginative world. Hamessley scored a rare coup for an academic by securing Parton’s participation in the book. Thus supported by the artist herself in the form of extensive, tape-recorded answers to the author’s written questions, Hamessley guides us expertly on a journey to, and through, Dolly’s musical imagination. She creates the term “Dolly’s Songwriting Workshop” to represent the imagined “place” where Dolly goes to create her songs; the conceit is effective on many levels, mainly because it spotlights the serious work behind Dolly Parton’s songwriting craft, something that has been glaringly absent from most journalistic writing about her music. We learn, in close detail, what goes on in Dolly’s workshop through careful examination of representative works drawn from the more than 3,000 songs and 450 recordings that Parton has created in her long career. We begin to grasp the reasons for her career’s extraordinary longevity: Parton’s persistent return to the musical well of her Appalachian heritage and her ability to extract material of astonishingly broad appeal from it. Her cross-cultural fan base is witness to this fact. Indeed, very few singer-songwriters have maintained a loyal fan base and international appeal for six decades. Hamessley takes us through the workshop with a mass of carefully curated materials that include contextualized discussions of songs, multiple listening guides, notated examples, and harmonic and melodic analyses. These crisp pedagogical elements display the author’s abundant expertise; fans need not fear that their beloved music will emerge diminished at the end of a reductionist critique. Dolly’s enthusiastic participation in the project would seem to further guarantee it. Steve Buckingham, too, contributes commentary and has allowed Hamessley to publish studio notes and producers’ handwritten lead sheets that provide an insider’s perspective on Dolly’s recording sessions. Dolly’s responses to Hamessley’s queries add rich detail to the defining feature of her life and art: her Appalachian heritage and musical community in [End Page 106] rural Tennessee. Chapters 3 and 4 trace her upbringing’s influence on her distinctive musical imagination and unique voice. Dolly provides what amounts to a fascinating personal “core repertory” when asked to list influential tunes from her childhood (57). It is also in these foundational chapters that Hamessley examines the misguided “Elizabethan” discourse around Dolly’s “mountain voice.” While Dolly connects her mountain identity and voice to “Celtic music from Scotland, Ireland, England, and Wales” (91), critics have overlain this with an Elizabethan veneer of which Hamessley writes, “They make both category and history errors when they misunderstand Dolly’s Appalachian heritage as Elizabethan, using this misnomer that has been attached to Appalachia for over a century” (91). Boom. Hamessley moves on from this intriguing topic quickly, yet by raising it she invites readers to consider pop/folk music critics’ construction of an idealized, frozen-intime Appalachia—a place where preindustrial British Isles culture remains pure and untouched by outside influences. By quoting Buckingham (“I never heard the word Elizabethan come out of her mouth” [91]), Hamessley effectively attributes this discourse solely...
评论:不可能的天使:多莉·帕顿之歌莉迪亚R.哈梅斯利安妮·卢尼·兰德尔不可能的天使:多莉·帕顿之歌。莉迪亚·r·哈梅斯利著。厄巴纳:伊利诺伊大学出版社,2020年。《不可能的天使》成功地聚焦于多莉·帕顿的音乐和创作过程,而不是自1960年开始她的职业生涯以来一直困扰着这位艺术家的公众形象的漫画元素。莉迪亚·r·哈梅斯利(Lydia R. Hamessley)的书彻底回应了多莉的制作人史蒂夫·白金汉(Steve Buckingham)在书的开头段落中所描述的困境:“几十年来,多莉和我有时会谈论她创造的‘卡通’(她的词不是我的)如何经常掩盖她作为词曲作者和音乐家的才华。我们一直努力把音乐放在第一位”(前言)。《不太可能的天使》坚定地把自己的旗帜放在“音乐第一”上,在这本286页的书中,每一页都对歌曲保持着敏锐的关注,同时也谈到了多莉·帕顿与漫画之间清晰的关系,揭示了她的公司在利用它进行商业利用的同时,又把它作为保护她想象世界的盾牌。哈梅斯利成功地让帕顿参与了这本书的写作,这在学术界是罕见的。因此,在艺术家本人的支持下,哈梅斯利以广泛的录音形式回答了作者的书面问题,他娴熟地引导我们踏上了一段探索多莉音乐想象力的旅程。她创造了“多莉的歌曲创作工作室”这个词来代表想象中的多莉创作歌曲的“地方”;这种自负在很多层面上都是有效的,主要是因为它突出了多莉·帕顿创作歌曲技巧背后的严肃工作,而这在大多数关于她音乐的新闻报道中是明显缺失的。通过仔细研究帕顿在她漫长的职业生涯中创作的3000多首歌曲和450多张唱片中的代表性作品,我们可以详细了解多莉工作室里发生的事情。我们开始理解她的职业生涯异常长寿的原因:帕顿坚持不懈地回归她的阿巴拉契亚遗产的音乐之井,以及她从中提取出令人惊讶的广泛吸引力的材料的能力。她的跨文化粉丝群证明了这一点。事实上,很少有创作型歌手能在60年里保持忠实的粉丝基础和国际吸引力。哈梅斯利带我们通过大量精心策划的材料,包括歌曲的语境化讨论,多种听力指南,标记的例子,和声和旋律分析工作坊。这些鲜明的教学元素显示了作者丰富的专业知识;乐迷们不必担心,他们心爱的音乐会在一场简化论者的批评结束后被削弱。多莉对这个项目的热情参与似乎进一步保证了这一点。史蒂夫·白金汉(Steve Buckingham)也提供评论,并允许哈梅斯利发表工作室笔记和制作人手写的指导表,以内部人士的角度了解多莉的录音过程。多莉对哈梅斯利问题的回答为她的生活和艺术增添了丰富的细节:她的阿巴拉契亚遗产和田纳西州农村的音乐社区。第三章和第四章追溯了她的成长经历对她独特的音乐想象力和独特的声音的影响。当被要求列出她童年时期有影响力的歌曲时,多莉提供了一个迷人的个人“核心剧目”(57)。在这些基础章节中,哈梅斯利也审视了围绕多莉“山声”的“伊丽莎白时代”话语的误导。当多莉将她的山地身份和声音与“来自苏格兰、爱尔兰、英格兰和威尔士的凯尔特音乐”联系在一起时(91),评论家们用伊丽莎白时代的外表掩盖了这一点,哈梅斯利写道,“当他们把多莉的阿巴拉契亚遗产误解为伊丽莎白时代时,他们犯了范畴和历史上的错误,使用了这个一个多世纪以来一直与阿巴拉契亚联系在一起的错误名称”(91)。繁荣。哈梅斯利很快离开了这个有趣的话题,但通过提出这个话题,她邀请读者思考流行/民间音乐评论家对一个理想化的、凝固在时间里的阿巴拉契亚的建构——一个前工业时代的不列颠群岛文化保持纯净、不受外界影响的地方。哈梅斯利引用白金汉的话(“我从来没有听到伊丽莎白这个词从她嘴里说出来”[91]),有效地将这一话语归结为……