Milton’s Poetical Thought by Maggie Kilgour (review)

IF 0.3 3区 历史学 0 MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES
Brandon Taylor
{"title":"Milton’s Poetical Thought by Maggie Kilgour (review)","authors":"Brandon Taylor","doi":"10.1353/cjm.2023.a912695","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: Milton’s Poetical Thought by Maggie Kilgour Brandon Taylor Maggie Kilgour, Milton’s Poetical Thought (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 129 pp. Maggie Kilgour’s Milton’s Poetical Thought is part of a larger series of texts that belong to Oxford’s The Literary Agenda, which, according to series editor Philip Davis, seeks to address “the importance of literature and of reading in the wider world” from the position that the literary is increasingly “dismissed or is unrecognized as a way of thinking or an arena for thought” (xi). The series aims to foster a “renewal, to start reinvigorated work into the meaning and value of literary reading for the sake of the future” (xi). Kilgour’s slim and insightful text takes up this pedagogical mission through the capacious and contentious vessel of John Milton and his poetic work, which she chronologically traces from his early poetry to his later masterpieces, Paradise Lost, Paradise Regained, and Samson Agonistes. The book is aimed at students and first introduces Milton as a student himself, young and ambitious and conflicted with his desire to satisfy his family’s, and especially his father’s, aspirations for his gifted son while also pursuing his interest in poetry. Kilgour’s foregrounding of Milton-the-student has the effect of humanizing Milton for students and also, importantly, signals the ways in which The Literary Agenda’s pedagogical program are best served by highlighting the human within the humanities. Having taught Shakespeare, Milton, Herbert, and other early modern authors and poets to undergraduate students in introductory courses, I can understand why students feel like professors are hefting an ancient leather-bound tome upon the lectern, blowing centuries-old dust off of its cover, and intoning about the wisdom of long-dead white men whose world and worldview are so alien from our own that their opinions could never have foretold of memes, TikTok dances, or the vicissitudes of ChatGPT-generated response papers. Kilgour’s work is therefore a welcome early modern intervention in the discourse on the importance of the literary and helps point toward a way of encouraging student familiarity with the literary by understanding the people—poets, artists, and authors—who create the works of literature and art that we have come to so enjoy reading and discussing. Kilgour argues that what makes poetry unique is that it is not simply a rigid system intended to deliver data; it is instead capacious and ultimately “excessive, beyond the author’s full control,” and that this latitude is liberating for readers, since Milton “allows us to have free will” (8) as active participants in his work. We are not bound by strict borders but are instead encouraged to explore and find joy in those complexities that the author, himself, may not have intended. The early portrait that Kilgour paints of Milton in the introduction is that of a lively human being inviting us to a poetic hearth, one where readers are asked to engage with ideas in a genre of writing that is filled with abundance and delight. Kilgour’s approach to poetry is cast in opposition to the wider world’s present-day utilitarianism, which “makes many think poetry is both too much hard work and a sheer luxury” (10). Having taught poetry numerous times in the last few years, I am still amazed at how often students believe that poetry is either a loose collection of fusty, moldering, and indecipherable words or a florid hymn to love that wouldn’t pass muster in a high school creative writing competition. What the study of Milton’s poetics offers, according to Kilgour, is “a world in which everything is overflowing and intertwined” (14). Milton’s poetic world is alive, [End Page 243] brimming with energy and humor and brought to life by an idiosyncratic and engaging point of view. It is why it is no small feat to humanize Milton, given the typical scale of his subject matter and the self-conscious way in which he constructed his poetic personae. Kilgour manages to do this admirably in the early stages of the book through a robust analysis of “Lycidas,” “Comus,” and Milton’s defense of his poetics...","PeriodicalId":53903,"journal":{"name":"COMITATUS-A JOURNAL OF MEDIEVAL AND RENAISSANCE STUDIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COMITATUS-A JOURNAL OF MEDIEVAL AND RENAISSANCE STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cjm.2023.a912695","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reviewed by: Milton’s Poetical Thought by Maggie Kilgour Brandon Taylor Maggie Kilgour, Milton’s Poetical Thought (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 129 pp. Maggie Kilgour’s Milton’s Poetical Thought is part of a larger series of texts that belong to Oxford’s The Literary Agenda, which, according to series editor Philip Davis, seeks to address “the importance of literature and of reading in the wider world” from the position that the literary is increasingly “dismissed or is unrecognized as a way of thinking or an arena for thought” (xi). The series aims to foster a “renewal, to start reinvigorated work into the meaning and value of literary reading for the sake of the future” (xi). Kilgour’s slim and insightful text takes up this pedagogical mission through the capacious and contentious vessel of John Milton and his poetic work, which she chronologically traces from his early poetry to his later masterpieces, Paradise Lost, Paradise Regained, and Samson Agonistes. The book is aimed at students and first introduces Milton as a student himself, young and ambitious and conflicted with his desire to satisfy his family’s, and especially his father’s, aspirations for his gifted son while also pursuing his interest in poetry. Kilgour’s foregrounding of Milton-the-student has the effect of humanizing Milton for students and also, importantly, signals the ways in which The Literary Agenda’s pedagogical program are best served by highlighting the human within the humanities. Having taught Shakespeare, Milton, Herbert, and other early modern authors and poets to undergraduate students in introductory courses, I can understand why students feel like professors are hefting an ancient leather-bound tome upon the lectern, blowing centuries-old dust off of its cover, and intoning about the wisdom of long-dead white men whose world and worldview are so alien from our own that their opinions could never have foretold of memes, TikTok dances, or the vicissitudes of ChatGPT-generated response papers. Kilgour’s work is therefore a welcome early modern intervention in the discourse on the importance of the literary and helps point toward a way of encouraging student familiarity with the literary by understanding the people—poets, artists, and authors—who create the works of literature and art that we have come to so enjoy reading and discussing. Kilgour argues that what makes poetry unique is that it is not simply a rigid system intended to deliver data; it is instead capacious and ultimately “excessive, beyond the author’s full control,” and that this latitude is liberating for readers, since Milton “allows us to have free will” (8) as active participants in his work. We are not bound by strict borders but are instead encouraged to explore and find joy in those complexities that the author, himself, may not have intended. The early portrait that Kilgour paints of Milton in the introduction is that of a lively human being inviting us to a poetic hearth, one where readers are asked to engage with ideas in a genre of writing that is filled with abundance and delight. Kilgour’s approach to poetry is cast in opposition to the wider world’s present-day utilitarianism, which “makes many think poetry is both too much hard work and a sheer luxury” (10). Having taught poetry numerous times in the last few years, I am still amazed at how often students believe that poetry is either a loose collection of fusty, moldering, and indecipherable words or a florid hymn to love that wouldn’t pass muster in a high school creative writing competition. What the study of Milton’s poetics offers, according to Kilgour, is “a world in which everything is overflowing and intertwined” (14). Milton’s poetic world is alive, [End Page 243] brimming with energy and humor and brought to life by an idiosyncratic and engaging point of view. It is why it is no small feat to humanize Milton, given the typical scale of his subject matter and the self-conscious way in which he constructed his poetic personae. Kilgour manages to do this admirably in the early stages of the book through a robust analysis of “Lycidas,” “Comus,” and Milton’s defense of his poetics...
《弥尔顿的诗性思想》玛吉·乔高著(书评)
《弥尔顿的诗性思想》作者:玛吉·乔高布兰登·泰勒玛吉·乔高,《弥尔顿的诗性思想》(牛津:麦琪·乔高的《弥尔顿的诗性思想》是属于牛津文学议程的更大系列文本的一部分,根据系列编辑菲利普·戴维斯的说法,该系列旨在解决“文学和在更广阔的世界中阅读的重要性”,从文学日益“被忽视或不被认可为一种思维方式或思想舞台”的立场(xi)。该系列旨在促进“更新,为了未来,开始重新激发文学阅读的意义和价值”(xi)。乔高的这本短小精悍的书通过约翰·弥尔顿和他的诗歌作品这艘宽敞而富有争议的船承担了这一教学使命,她按时间顺序追溯了弥尔顿早期的诗歌到他后来的杰作,《失乐园》、《复乐园》和《参孙》。这本书是针对学生的,首先介绍了弥尔顿作为一个学生,年轻,雄心勃勃,与他的愿望相矛盾,他想满足他的家人,尤其是他的父亲,对他有天赋的儿子的渴望,同时也追求他对诗歌的兴趣。乔高把弥尔顿的学生放在前台,对学生来说,弥尔顿是人性化的,而且,重要的是,这标志着《文学议程》的教学项目,通过强调人文学科中的人性,得到了最好的服务。我曾在入门课程中向本科生讲授过莎士比亚、弥尔顿、赫伯特和其他早期现代作家和诗人,我能理解为什么学生们会觉得教授们把一本古老的皮面大部头放在讲台上,把封面上几百年的灰尘吹掉,高唱着早已死去的白人的智慧,他们的世界和世界观与我们的世界和世界观如此不同,以至于他们的观点永远不可能预测到表情包、TikTok舞蹈、或者chatgpt生成的回应论文的变迁。因此,乔高的作品是对文学重要性的早期现代论述的一种受欢迎的介入,并有助于指出一种方法,通过了解人们——诗人、艺术家和作家——来鼓励学生熟悉文学,这些人创造了我们如此喜欢阅读和讨论的文学和艺术作品。乔高认为,诗歌的独特之处在于,它不仅仅是一个旨在传递数据的僵化系统;相反,它是广阔的,最终是“过度的,超出了作者的完全控制”,这种自由度对读者来说是解放的,因为弥尔顿“允许我们拥有自由意志”(8),作为他作品的积极参与者。我们没有被严格的界限所束缚,而是被鼓励去探索和寻找作者本人可能没有想过的复杂性的乐趣。乔高在引言中描绘的弥尔顿的早期肖像,是一个活泼的人,邀请我们来到一个诗意的壁炉,在那里,读者被要求以一种充满丰富和喜悦的写作类型,参与到思想中来。乔高的诗歌研究方法与当今更广泛的功利主义背道而驰,这种功利主义“使许多人认为诗歌既是太辛苦的工作,又是纯粹的奢侈品”(10)。在过去的几年里,我教过很多次诗歌,但我仍然惊讶于学生们经常认为诗歌要么是一些发霉、腐烂、难以理解的单词的松散集合,要么是一首华丽的爱情赞美诗,在高中的创意写作比赛中无法通过考试。根据乔高的说法,弥尔顿的诗学研究提供的是“一个万物泛滥、相互交织的世界”(14)。弥尔顿的诗歌世界是鲜活的,充满了活力和幽默,以一种独特而引人入胜的观点赋予了它生命。这就是为什么把弥尔顿人性化是一项不小的壮举,考虑到他的主题的典型规模和他构建诗歌人物的自觉方式。乔高通过对《利西达斯》、《科玛斯》以及弥尔顿对自己诗学的辩护,在书的早期阶段就出色地做到了这一点……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Comitatus: A Journal of Medieval and Renaissance Studies publishes articles by graduate students and recent PhDs in any field of medieval and Renaissance studies. The journal maintains a tradition of gathering work from across disciplines, with a special interest in articles that have an interdisciplinary or cross-cultural scope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信