How Do We Sound? How Do We Listen?

IF 0.1 0 MUSIC
Sherrie Tucker
{"title":"How Do We Sound? How Do We Listen?","authors":"Sherrie Tucker","doi":"10.1353/wam.2023.a912254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How Do We Sound? How Do We Listen? Sherrie Tucker Thank you, Tracy, and thank you, everybody—and thank you to the faculty at the Institute of Jazz and Gender Justice for this incredibly reflexive, inspiring, interactive discussion of how you approach pedagogy through your work in this teaching and learning environment that is unlike any other. Your work veers dramatically and urgently away from the dominant models of jazz performance training. I just kept thinking, is this what their department meetings are like? Can we Zoom in? Just amazing discussion, openness, spirit. I took so many notes—your conversations are so unlike much of what is out there. And I want to thank the organizers of this incredible two-day event to spend quality time thinking through issues of jazz and gender justice with Black women at the center of jazz, jazz education, and jazz studies—and this conceived as a return—not as “breaking news, this just in!” Black women have been at the center of jazz, jazz studies, jazz and gender studies, jazz and racial justice studies, social justice studies, and social justice organizing for decades, recognized or not, in a continuum that is as old and as new as jazz itself. From my perspective, Black women have been at the center of the critical turn in jazz studies for at least thirty years. It’s been great to see so many of the people who I associate with this turn on this program. You have been at the center of developing frameworks for remembering and knowing the Black women at the center from before you were born. As we’ve heard again and again over the last three days, through the lens of Black feminist theory and praxis, centering Black women is not a narrowing but an expanding. It is capacious. A jazz that centers Black women, and Black feminist theory and praxis, returns and propels us toward a capacious jazz. Yesterday, Angela Davis talked about how “jazz helps us to feel differently,” an important part of “community-building projects.” She said, “It allows us to feel [End Page 86] what we cannot always put into words” and that jazz is a “practice of freedom.” Yesterday, we heard several rich discussions about Black feminist theory and praxis— and how it means many different things to different people and changes over time, while identifying some key principles. Capacious—such a beautiful word—kept recurring: the idea that Black feminist theory and praxis was not always inclusive in the same ways, but that it has been capacious in the tenet that freedom for Black women would mean freedom for everyone. The “everyone” has expanded at times, which is another principle: that Black feminist theory and praxis is responsible to changes in consciousness and expanding notions of inclusion. Robin D. G. Kelley offered a concise working definition of Black Feminist Thought yesterday as, and this is what I wrote in my notes, that [Black feminism] was “an interrogation into all forms of oppression and possibility that is born of Black women’s refusal to accept other people’s definition of who of they are.” That is a different kind of identity politics than an essentialist identity politics. It is also a different kind of identity politics than a universal, “everyone is the same” politics. This goes back to Barbara Smith’s explanation of identity politics, as put forward by the Combahee River Collective, as the assertion of a “right,” as Black women, to “create a politics that is absolutely aligned with our own experiences as Black women—in other words, with our identities. That’s what we meant by ‘identity politics,’ that we have a right. And, trust me, very few people agreed that we did have that right in the nineteen-seventies. So we asserted it anyway.”1 To acknowledge Black women at the center of something, is a fundamentally different move than the “other people’s definition” that habitually welcomes Black women as new arrivals to a space created without them. Centering and entering yield very different orientations. A shift in centering—who is perceived to have already arrived and belong—necessarily shifts an understanding of...","PeriodicalId":40563,"journal":{"name":"Women and Music-A Journal of Gender and Culture","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women and Music-A Journal of Gender and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/wam.2023.a912254","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

How Do We Sound? How Do We Listen? Sherrie Tucker Thank you, Tracy, and thank you, everybody—and thank you to the faculty at the Institute of Jazz and Gender Justice for this incredibly reflexive, inspiring, interactive discussion of how you approach pedagogy through your work in this teaching and learning environment that is unlike any other. Your work veers dramatically and urgently away from the dominant models of jazz performance training. I just kept thinking, is this what their department meetings are like? Can we Zoom in? Just amazing discussion, openness, spirit. I took so many notes—your conversations are so unlike much of what is out there. And I want to thank the organizers of this incredible two-day event to spend quality time thinking through issues of jazz and gender justice with Black women at the center of jazz, jazz education, and jazz studies—and this conceived as a return—not as “breaking news, this just in!” Black women have been at the center of jazz, jazz studies, jazz and gender studies, jazz and racial justice studies, social justice studies, and social justice organizing for decades, recognized or not, in a continuum that is as old and as new as jazz itself. From my perspective, Black women have been at the center of the critical turn in jazz studies for at least thirty years. It’s been great to see so many of the people who I associate with this turn on this program. You have been at the center of developing frameworks for remembering and knowing the Black women at the center from before you were born. As we’ve heard again and again over the last three days, through the lens of Black feminist theory and praxis, centering Black women is not a narrowing but an expanding. It is capacious. A jazz that centers Black women, and Black feminist theory and praxis, returns and propels us toward a capacious jazz. Yesterday, Angela Davis talked about how “jazz helps us to feel differently,” an important part of “community-building projects.” She said, “It allows us to feel [End Page 86] what we cannot always put into words” and that jazz is a “practice of freedom.” Yesterday, we heard several rich discussions about Black feminist theory and praxis— and how it means many different things to different people and changes over time, while identifying some key principles. Capacious—such a beautiful word—kept recurring: the idea that Black feminist theory and praxis was not always inclusive in the same ways, but that it has been capacious in the tenet that freedom for Black women would mean freedom for everyone. The “everyone” has expanded at times, which is another principle: that Black feminist theory and praxis is responsible to changes in consciousness and expanding notions of inclusion. Robin D. G. Kelley offered a concise working definition of Black Feminist Thought yesterday as, and this is what I wrote in my notes, that [Black feminism] was “an interrogation into all forms of oppression and possibility that is born of Black women’s refusal to accept other people’s definition of who of they are.” That is a different kind of identity politics than an essentialist identity politics. It is also a different kind of identity politics than a universal, “everyone is the same” politics. This goes back to Barbara Smith’s explanation of identity politics, as put forward by the Combahee River Collective, as the assertion of a “right,” as Black women, to “create a politics that is absolutely aligned with our own experiences as Black women—in other words, with our identities. That’s what we meant by ‘identity politics,’ that we have a right. And, trust me, very few people agreed that we did have that right in the nineteen-seventies. So we asserted it anyway.”1 To acknowledge Black women at the center of something, is a fundamentally different move than the “other people’s definition” that habitually welcomes Black women as new arrivals to a space created without them. Centering and entering yield very different orientations. A shift in centering—who is perceived to have already arrived and belong—necessarily shifts an understanding of...
我们的声音如何?我们如何倾听?
我们的声音如何?我们如何倾听?谢谢你,特蕾西,谢谢大家,谢谢爵士与性别正义研究所的全体教职员工,你们进行了令人难以置信的反思,鼓舞人心的,互动的讨论,讨论了你们是如何通过自己的工作在这个不同于其他任何教学环境中的教学方法的。你的工作戏剧性地、急迫地偏离了爵士表演训练的主流模式。我一直在想,他们的部门会议是这样的吗?我们能放大吗?令人惊叹的讨论、开放和精神。我做了很多笔记——你们的对话和网上的很多都不一样。我要感谢这次令人难以置信的两天活动的组织者,让他们花宝贵的时间与处于爵士乐、爵士乐教育和爵士乐研究中心的黑人女性一起思考爵士乐和性别正义的问题——这是一种回归,而不是“突发新闻,这是最新消息!”几十年来,黑人女性一直处于爵士乐、爵士乐研究、爵士乐与性别研究、爵士乐与种族正义研究、社会正义研究和社会正义组织的中心,不管是否被承认,这是一个与爵士乐本身一样古老和新的连续体。在我看来,至少30年来,黑人女性一直处于爵士乐研究关键转折的中心。很高兴看到这么多与我有联系的人开始参与这个项目。从你出生前起,你就一直处于建立记忆和了解黑人女性的框架的中心。正如我们在过去三天里一次又一次听到的那样,通过黑人女权主义理论和实践的镜头,以黑人女性为中心不是缩小,而是扩大。它是宽敞的。一种以黑人女性、黑人女权主义理论和实践为中心的爵士乐,回归并推动我们走向一种广阔的爵士乐。昨天,安吉拉·戴维斯谈到了“爵士乐如何帮助我们感受不同”,这是“社区建设项目”的重要组成部分。她说,“它让我们感受到我们无法用语言表达的东西”,爵士乐是一种“自由的实践”。昨天,我们听到了一些关于黑人女权主义理论和实践的丰富讨论,以及它对不同的人意味着什么,随着时间的推移会发生什么变化,同时确定了一些关键原则。宽宏大量——这样一个美丽的词不断重复出现:黑人女权主义理论和实践并不总是以同样的方式包容,但在黑人女性的自由意味着所有人的自由的原则上,它一直是宽宏大量的。“每个人”有时会扩大,这是另一个原则:黑人女权主义理论和实践对意识的变化和包容概念的扩大负有责任。罗宾·d·g·凯利(Robin D. G. Kelley)昨天对黑人女权主义思想给出了一个简明的定义,这是我在笔记中所写的,即黑人女权主义是“对所有形式的压迫和可能性的质疑,这些压迫和可能性源于黑人女性拒绝接受别人对她们是谁的定义。”这是一种不同于本质主义的身份政治。这也是一种不同于普遍的“人人都一样”的身份政治。这可以追溯到芭芭拉·史密斯(Barbara Smith)对身份政治的解释,这是由Combahee River Collective提出的,作为一种“权利”的主张,作为黑人女性,“创造一种与我们作为黑人女性的经历绝对一致的政治——换句话说,与我们的身份一致。”这就是我们所说的“身份政治”,我们有权利。相信我,在20世纪70年代,很少有人同意我们有这个权利。所以我们还是断言了它。承认黑人女性是某件事的中心,这与“其他人的定义”有着根本的不同。“其他人的定义”习惯性地将黑人女性视为新来者,欢迎她们进入一个没有她们的空间。定心和进入产生非常不同的方向。中心的转变——谁被认为已经到达并属于——必然会改变对……的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信