On Creative Biography of the Artist of the Second half of the 19th Century Anton Zakharovich Ledakov

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Svetlana I. Mikhaylova
{"title":"On Creative Biography of the Artist of the Second half of the 19th Century Anton Zakharovich Ledakov","authors":"Svetlana I. Mikhaylova","doi":"10.37816/2073-9567-2023-69-379-396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the Russian painters who left their creative mark in the Holy Land was Anton Zakharovich Ledakov, an artist of the second half of the 19th century, a graduate of the Imperial Academy of Arts. His biographical data, published in various sources, are very scarce and contradictory. For example, in the memoirs of A. N. Leskov, the artist is cast in an emotionally negative light, and the factual information presented there is refuted by archival documents of the Academy of Arts. Some refined details were found out thanks to the materials stored in the archives of Moscow, St. Petersburg and Samara: Ledakov came from court peasants of the village of Berezovy Gai of the Samara court estate. We also know from archival documents that he owned the murals of the church of the Great Martyress Catherine on Vasilyevsky Island, the ceiling in the altar of the house church of the righteous Zechariah and Elizabeth at the Elizabethan almshouse of the Eliseyevs in St. Petersburg, more than twenty icons and paintings for the chapel in Yelabuga. However, these works have not survived. A portrait of N. S. Leskov has been preserved from the artist heritage in Russia (currently located in the collection of the V. I. Dahl State Museum of the History of Russian Literature). The documents of the Central State Archive of the Samara Region made it possible to calculate estimated year of birth of the artist, but it has not yet been possible to find out the date of death. It is puzzling why the fact of the death of a person who had been in sight for a long time, and whose name was mercilessly bandied about in press, was passed by in silence. Many derogatory references to him were made by his fellow student at the Academy of Arts Ivan Nikolaevich Kramskoy, as well as the famous art critic Vladimir Vasilyevich Stasov. Most likely, he earned such a negative attitude by his commitment to academic writing and church art. In the Holy Land, he painted icons for free for the iconostasis of the Church of the Apostle Peter and the righteous Tavifa in the city of Jaffa (which were preserved), as a work entrusted to him by the Imperial Orthodox Palestinian Society. The study makes a number of assumptions about possible prototypes of this iconostasis, designed by Archimandrite Antonin (Kapustin), the fourth head of the Russian Spiritual Mission in Jerusalem, including analogies with polyptyches of Venetian Renaissance artists. The paper points out that the selection of saints for the top row at the request of the archimandrite was completely entrusted to Anton Ledakov. The author is trying to determine the motives for the artist's choice of the selection of these saints.","PeriodicalId":41255,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Slavianskikh Kultur-Bulletin of Slavic Cultures-Scientific and Informational Journal","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik Slavianskikh Kultur-Bulletin of Slavic Cultures-Scientific and Informational Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37816/2073-9567-2023-69-379-396","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One of the Russian painters who left their creative mark in the Holy Land was Anton Zakharovich Ledakov, an artist of the second half of the 19th century, a graduate of the Imperial Academy of Arts. His biographical data, published in various sources, are very scarce and contradictory. For example, in the memoirs of A. N. Leskov, the artist is cast in an emotionally negative light, and the factual information presented there is refuted by archival documents of the Academy of Arts. Some refined details were found out thanks to the materials stored in the archives of Moscow, St. Petersburg and Samara: Ledakov came from court peasants of the village of Berezovy Gai of the Samara court estate. We also know from archival documents that he owned the murals of the church of the Great Martyress Catherine on Vasilyevsky Island, the ceiling in the altar of the house church of the righteous Zechariah and Elizabeth at the Elizabethan almshouse of the Eliseyevs in St. Petersburg, more than twenty icons and paintings for the chapel in Yelabuga. However, these works have not survived. A portrait of N. S. Leskov has been preserved from the artist heritage in Russia (currently located in the collection of the V. I. Dahl State Museum of the History of Russian Literature). The documents of the Central State Archive of the Samara Region made it possible to calculate estimated year of birth of the artist, but it has not yet been possible to find out the date of death. It is puzzling why the fact of the death of a person who had been in sight for a long time, and whose name was mercilessly bandied about in press, was passed by in silence. Many derogatory references to him were made by his fellow student at the Academy of Arts Ivan Nikolaevich Kramskoy, as well as the famous art critic Vladimir Vasilyevich Stasov. Most likely, he earned such a negative attitude by his commitment to academic writing and church art. In the Holy Land, he painted icons for free for the iconostasis of the Church of the Apostle Peter and the righteous Tavifa in the city of Jaffa (which were preserved), as a work entrusted to him by the Imperial Orthodox Palestinian Society. The study makes a number of assumptions about possible prototypes of this iconostasis, designed by Archimandrite Antonin (Kapustin), the fourth head of the Russian Spiritual Mission in Jerusalem, including analogies with polyptyches of Venetian Renaissance artists. The paper points out that the selection of saints for the top row at the request of the archimandrite was completely entrusted to Anton Ledakov. The author is trying to determine the motives for the artist's choice of the selection of these saints.
19世纪下半叶艺术家安东·扎哈罗维奇·列达科夫创作传记
安东·扎哈罗维奇·列达科夫(Anton Zakharovich Ledakov)是在圣地留下创作印记的俄罗斯画家之一,他是19世纪下半叶的艺术家,毕业于帝国艺术学院(Imperial Academy of Arts)。他的传记资料,发表在各种来源,是非常稀少和矛盾的。例如,在a·n·列斯科夫(A. N. Leskov)的回忆录中,艺术家在情感上被赋予了负面的形象,那里呈现的事实信息被艺术学院的档案文件所驳斥。通过保存在莫斯科、圣彼得堡和萨马拉档案馆的材料,我们发现了一些精致的细节:列达科夫来自萨马拉宫廷庄园别列佐夫盖村的宫廷农民。我们还从档案文件中了解到,他拥有瓦西里耶夫斯基岛上伟大的凯瑟琳殉道者教堂的壁画,圣彼得堡伊利莎白家族伊丽莎白救济院正义的撒迦利亚和伊丽莎白家庭教堂祭坛的天花板,以及叶拉布加教堂的二十多幅圣像和绘画。然而,这些作品并没有保存下来。列斯科夫的肖像从俄罗斯的艺术家遗产中保存下来(目前位于俄罗斯文学史的达尔国家博物馆的收藏中)。萨马拉地区中央国家档案馆的文件使人们能够计算出这位艺术家的估计出生年份,但还无法确定其死亡日期。令人费解的是,为什么一个人的死亡已经出现了很长一段时间,他的名字在媒体上被无情地传播,却被沉默地忽略了。他在艺术学院的同学伊万·尼古拉耶维奇·克拉姆斯科伊以及著名的艺术评论家弗拉基米尔·瓦西里耶维奇·斯塔索夫对他进行了许多贬损。最有可能的是,他对学术写作和教会艺术的投入使他获得了如此消极的态度。在圣地,他免费为雅法市的使徒彼得教堂和正义的塔维法教堂的圣像画圣像(这些圣像被保存了下来),这是帝国正统巴勒斯坦协会委托给他的工作。这项研究对这种圣像的可能原型做出了一些假设,它是由耶路撒冷俄罗斯精神使团的第四任团长阿奇曼德·安东宁(Kapustin)设计的,包括与威尼斯文艺复兴时期艺术家的多形画的类比。论文指出,在大主教的要求下,选择最上面一排的圣徒完全委托给了安东·列达科夫。作者试图确定艺术家选择这些圣人的动机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信