Mitigation of climate crisis from rice paddy field by tillage combination in central China

IF 1.6 Q2 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
{"title":"Mitigation of climate crisis from rice paddy field by tillage combination in central China","authors":"","doi":"10.35495/ajab.2022.122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We have tested the tillage combination to study methods that help curtail the release of greenhouse gasses from rice paddy fields have had on the climate and contrasted the potential outcomes for rice production (Oryza sativa L.), no-tillage plus no fertilizer (NT0), conventional tillage plus no fertilizer (CT0), conventional tillage plus compound fertilizer (CTC), no-tillage plus compound fertilizer (NTC) by measuring ammonia volatilization and greenhouse gases emissions (GHG) from paddy fields for rice throughout the year of 2018 in the subtropical area of central China. The mean NH 3 volatilization in CT0 was 9.55% greater than that in NT0 by (p>0.05), and for NTC, it was 11.30% (p>0.05) lower than in CTC. In comparison to CT0, the mean CH 4 emission flux in NT0 was 1.12% (p>0.05) lower, but the mean CH 4 emission flux in CTC was 28.34% (p> 0.05) higher than that in NTC. The mean N 2 O emission flux in NT0 was 174.72% (p˂0.05) lower than in CT0. The average flux of N 2 O emission in CTC was 47.90% (p˃ 0.05) greater than in NTC. We compared the IGWPs based on N 2 O, CH 4 , and CO 2 emission flux. CT0 had the lowest (non-significant) recorded amount at 12097.43KgCO 2 .ha -1 of GWPs, which was only 397.5KgCO 2 .ha -1 lower than that in NT0. CTC had the highest recorded amount at 20042.72KgCO 2 .ha -1 of GWPs, which was 2292.53KgCO 2 .ha -1 higher than that reported in NTC. NTC system to be the superior, sustainable method for mitigating the harmful effects of GHG emissions contributing to the climate crisis by way of rice production in rice paddy fields","PeriodicalId":8506,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Agriculture and Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Agriculture and Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35495/ajab.2022.122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We have tested the tillage combination to study methods that help curtail the release of greenhouse gasses from rice paddy fields have had on the climate and contrasted the potential outcomes for rice production (Oryza sativa L.), no-tillage plus no fertilizer (NT0), conventional tillage plus no fertilizer (CT0), conventional tillage plus compound fertilizer (CTC), no-tillage plus compound fertilizer (NTC) by measuring ammonia volatilization and greenhouse gases emissions (GHG) from paddy fields for rice throughout the year of 2018 in the subtropical area of central China. The mean NH 3 volatilization in CT0 was 9.55% greater than that in NT0 by (p>0.05), and for NTC, it was 11.30% (p>0.05) lower than in CTC. In comparison to CT0, the mean CH 4 emission flux in NT0 was 1.12% (p>0.05) lower, but the mean CH 4 emission flux in CTC was 28.34% (p> 0.05) higher than that in NTC. The mean N 2 O emission flux in NT0 was 174.72% (p˂0.05) lower than in CT0. The average flux of N 2 O emission in CTC was 47.90% (p˃ 0.05) greater than in NTC. We compared the IGWPs based on N 2 O, CH 4 , and CO 2 emission flux. CT0 had the lowest (non-significant) recorded amount at 12097.43KgCO 2 .ha -1 of GWPs, which was only 397.5KgCO 2 .ha -1 lower than that in NT0. CTC had the highest recorded amount at 20042.72KgCO 2 .ha -1 of GWPs, which was 2292.53KgCO 2 .ha -1 higher than that reported in NTC. NTC system to be the superior, sustainable method for mitigating the harmful effects of GHG emissions contributing to the climate crisis by way of rice production in rice paddy fields
中国中部水稻耕作组合缓解气候危机
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asian Journal of Agriculture and Biology
Asian Journal of Agriculture and Biology AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
4.50%
发文量
27
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Asian Journal of Agriculture and Biology (AJAB) is a peer reviewed, open access, quarterly journal serving as a means for scientific information exchange in international and national fora. The scope encompasses all disciplines of agriculture and biology including animal, plant and environmental sciences. All manuscripts are evaluated for their scientific content and significance by the Editor-in-Chief &/or Managing Editor and at least two independent reviewers. All submitted manuscripts should contain unpublished original research which should not be under consideration for publication elsewhere. In order to avoid unnecessary delay in publication, authors are requested to comply the following guidelines; differing these, your submission will be returned for additional revision.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信