Idea generation, development and selection: a study of mechanical engineering students’ natural approaches and the impact of hybrid learning blocks

IF 1.8 Q3 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING
Design Science Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1017/dsj.2023.26
Jin Woo Lee, Shanna R. Daly, Varghese Vadakumcherry, Gabriella Rodriguez
{"title":"Idea generation, development and selection: a study of mechanical engineering students’ natural approaches and the impact of hybrid learning blocks","authors":"Jin Woo Lee, Shanna R. Daly, Varghese Vadakumcherry, Gabriella Rodriguez","doi":"10.1017/dsj.2023.26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Developing effective design solutions requires successful idea generation, development and selection. Studies have demonstrated that engineering students face challenges in these idea phases and may struggle to implement recommended practices, hindering the potential for an innovative outcome. The first part of the study investigated student practices in idea generation, development and selection through think-aloud experimental sessions and post-session interviews. Data analysis from mechanical engineering students’ sessions, with think-aloud and interview data, revealed that students focused on existing ideas, assumed requirements that constrained their divergence, limited their development of ideas and did not engage much in idea selection. Then, in the second phase of the study, we implemented a learning intervention that leveraged research-based education practices to examine student adoption of recommended practices. After engaging with the learning blocks, students generated unconventional ideas, abstained from requirement assumptions early in ideation, generated a larger quantity of ideas, developed ideas intentionally and used more rigorous idea selection methods. These outcomes demonstrated that a relatively short and targeted intervention can support students in leveraging recommended approaches to idea generation, development and selection.","PeriodicalId":54146,"journal":{"name":"Design Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Design Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2023.26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Developing effective design solutions requires successful idea generation, development and selection. Studies have demonstrated that engineering students face challenges in these idea phases and may struggle to implement recommended practices, hindering the potential for an innovative outcome. The first part of the study investigated student practices in idea generation, development and selection through think-aloud experimental sessions and post-session interviews. Data analysis from mechanical engineering students’ sessions, with think-aloud and interview data, revealed that students focused on existing ideas, assumed requirements that constrained their divergence, limited their development of ideas and did not engage much in idea selection. Then, in the second phase of the study, we implemented a learning intervention that leveraged research-based education practices to examine student adoption of recommended practices. After engaging with the learning blocks, students generated unconventional ideas, abstained from requirement assumptions early in ideation, generated a larger quantity of ideas, developed ideas intentionally and used more rigorous idea selection methods. These outcomes demonstrated that a relatively short and targeted intervention can support students in leveraging recommended approaches to idea generation, development and selection.
想法的产生、发展和选择:机械工程学生的自然方法和混合学习块的影响的研究
开发有效的设计解决方案需要成功的创意生成、开发和选择。研究表明,工科学生在这些想法阶段面临挑战,可能难以实施推荐的实践,从而阻碍了创新成果的潜力。研究的第一部分通过大声思考实验和课后访谈调查了学生在创意产生、发展和选择方面的实践。来自机械工程专业学生的数据分析,包括大声思考和面试数据,揭示了学生们专注于现有的想法,假设限制他们分歧的要求,限制他们的想法发展,并没有参与太多的想法选择。然后,在研究的第二阶段,我们实施了一项学习干预,利用基于研究的教育实践来检查学生对推荐实践的采用情况。在参与学习模块后,学生产生了非常规的想法,在构思早期放弃了需求假设,产生了更多的想法,有意地发展了想法,使用了更严格的想法选择方法。这些结果表明,相对较短和有针对性的干预可以帮助学生利用建议的方法来产生、发展和选择想法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Design Science
Design Science ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
19
审稿时长
22 weeks
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信