Pedagogical grammar as the framework of TEFL research. Part 14. Age and foreign language acquisition: experimental data

L. Chernovaty
{"title":"Pedagogical grammar as the framework of TEFL research. Part 14. Age and foreign language acquisition: experimental data","authors":"L. Chernovaty","doi":"10.26565/2073-4379-2023-42-11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper presents a comparative analysis of various groups of data (language acquisition speed, quality of language acquisition, comparative acquisition efficiency depending on the period of exposure, adult-child, and younger-children versus older-childrenʼs differences in acquisition) obtained in different experiments over a substantial time span. As it follows from the experimental studies analysis, there is conflicting data regarding the existence of a “critical age” for the foreign language acquisition and its specific limits. Much of the data can be interpreted in various ways. Differences between adults and children, older children and younger children can be explained not only by the existence of the “critical age”, but also by other reasons. The advantage of older students may be explained by their better memory, which allows them to learn a large number of clichés with which they successfully communicate, even having a very limited supply of language material. In general, basing on the available data, it is hardly possible to state that there is any age boundary in human life beyond which the foreign language acquisition is impossible or difficult to any serious degree. Experimental data, while contradictory, do not give rise to a straightforward conclusion about the advantage of any age group in any aspect of language. In short-time courses, adults progress faster but on longer stretches, children close the gap and even outpace adults. There are quite a few differences in language acquisition between adults and children, as well as older and younger children, but these differences are probably not due to the existence of a “critical age”, but to other factors discussed in the paper. It is likely that adults can learn language just as effectively as children provided the factors that impede their learning (strong instrumental and integrative motivation, absence of unfavorable affective factors, etc.) are eliminated. However, this assumption requires further research.","PeriodicalId":33456,"journal":{"name":"Vikladannia mov u vishchikh navchal''nikh zakladakh osviti na suchasnomu etapi Mizhpredmetni zviazki","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vikladannia mov u vishchikh navchal''nikh zakladakh osviti na suchasnomu etapi Mizhpredmetni zviazki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26565/2073-4379-2023-42-11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper presents a comparative analysis of various groups of data (language acquisition speed, quality of language acquisition, comparative acquisition efficiency depending on the period of exposure, adult-child, and younger-children versus older-childrenʼs differences in acquisition) obtained in different experiments over a substantial time span. As it follows from the experimental studies analysis, there is conflicting data regarding the existence of a “critical age” for the foreign language acquisition and its specific limits. Much of the data can be interpreted in various ways. Differences between adults and children, older children and younger children can be explained not only by the existence of the “critical age”, but also by other reasons. The advantage of older students may be explained by their better memory, which allows them to learn a large number of clichés with which they successfully communicate, even having a very limited supply of language material. In general, basing on the available data, it is hardly possible to state that there is any age boundary in human life beyond which the foreign language acquisition is impossible or difficult to any serious degree. Experimental data, while contradictory, do not give rise to a straightforward conclusion about the advantage of any age group in any aspect of language. In short-time courses, adults progress faster but on longer stretches, children close the gap and even outpace adults. There are quite a few differences in language acquisition between adults and children, as well as older and younger children, but these differences are probably not due to the existence of a “critical age”, but to other factors discussed in the paper. It is likely that adults can learn language just as effectively as children provided the factors that impede their learning (strong instrumental and integrative motivation, absence of unfavorable affective factors, etc.) are eliminated. However, this assumption requires further research.
教学语法作为外语教学研究的框架。部分14。年龄与外语习得:实验数据
本文对在相当长的时间跨度内不同实验中获得的不同组数据(语言习得速度、语言习得质量、取决于接触时间的比较习得效率、成人与儿童、幼儿与大幼儿在习得方面的差异)进行了比较分析。从实验研究分析中可以看出,关于外语习得“关键年龄”的存在及其具体限制,存在着相互矛盾的数据。很多数据可以用不同的方式来解释。成人与儿童、大龄儿童与幼龄儿童之间的差异,不仅可以用“临界年龄”的存在来解释,还可以用其他原因来解释。年龄较大的学生的优势可以用他们更好的记忆力来解释,这使他们能够学习大量的陈词滥调,即使语言材料的供应非常有限,他们也能成功地与人交流。总的来说,根据现有的数据,很难说在人类生活中存在任何年龄界限,超过这个年龄界限,外语习得就不可能或困难到任何严重的程度。实验数据虽然相互矛盾,但并没有得出任何年龄组在语言的任何方面都具有优势的直接结论。在短期课程中,成年人进步更快,但在较长的课程中,孩子们缩小了差距,甚至超过了成年人。在语言习得方面,成人和儿童,以及大一点的和小一点的儿童之间存在着相当多的差异,但这些差异可能不是由于“关键年龄”的存在,而是由于本文所讨论的其他因素。如果排除阻碍成年人学习的因素(强烈的工具性和综合性动机,缺乏不利的情感因素等),成年人很可能能像儿童一样有效地学习语言。然而,这一假设需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信