A critical review of the mixed method application and its criticism

Sathiyakumar Chandrakumar, Ramakrishnan Vivek
{"title":"A critical review of the mixed method application and its criticism","authors":"Sathiyakumar Chandrakumar, Ramakrishnan Vivek","doi":"10.25128/2520-6230.23.2.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose - This research paper aims to apply and criticize mixed methods research in different fields. Mixed methods research (MMR) has also faced criticism for its conceptual and methodological challenges. Therefore, this study will explore the research’s criticism and strategies for overcoming them. Methodology - Most of the current research works employ a mixed research methodology. Researchers use the mixed methodology to investigate challenging research questions that a single methodology cannot answer. Findings - This research paper presents results related to using mixed methods research in various fields. Some critics argue that MMR lacks methodological rigor and can be time-consuming; others acknowledge its value in providing a more comprehensive understanding of complex social phenomena and marginalized communities. MMR has successfully employed to identify gaps in student knowledge, explore the interplay between psychological and physiological factors in health and illness, and develop more effective policies. However, balancing the depth of qualitative data with the breadth of quantitative data can be challenging, leading to compromises. Practical implications - The findings of this research have important practical implications for researchers and practitioners across various fields. It can be beneficial, specifically in education, health psychology, and public policy. Recommendations - Researchers should consider using mixed methods to examine complex research questions that require a multifaceted approach. Also, they should incorporate both quantitative and qualitative data to provide a more complete understanding of the research question. MMR can help capture diverse perspectives and experiences, particularly for underrepresented populations, providing a more nuanced understanding of social phenomena. These recommendations highlight the potential benefits of using mixed methods research and suggest directions for future research.","PeriodicalId":55832,"journal":{"name":"Social Work and Education","volume":"121 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Work and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25128/2520-6230.23.2.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose - This research paper aims to apply and criticize mixed methods research in different fields. Mixed methods research (MMR) has also faced criticism for its conceptual and methodological challenges. Therefore, this study will explore the research’s criticism and strategies for overcoming them. Methodology - Most of the current research works employ a mixed research methodology. Researchers use the mixed methodology to investigate challenging research questions that a single methodology cannot answer. Findings - This research paper presents results related to using mixed methods research in various fields. Some critics argue that MMR lacks methodological rigor and can be time-consuming; others acknowledge its value in providing a more comprehensive understanding of complex social phenomena and marginalized communities. MMR has successfully employed to identify gaps in student knowledge, explore the interplay between psychological and physiological factors in health and illness, and develop more effective policies. However, balancing the depth of qualitative data with the breadth of quantitative data can be challenging, leading to compromises. Practical implications - The findings of this research have important practical implications for researchers and practitioners across various fields. It can be beneficial, specifically in education, health psychology, and public policy. Recommendations - Researchers should consider using mixed methods to examine complex research questions that require a multifaceted approach. Also, they should incorporate both quantitative and qualitative data to provide a more complete understanding of the research question. MMR can help capture diverse perspectives and experiences, particularly for underrepresented populations, providing a more nuanced understanding of social phenomena. These recommendations highlight the potential benefits of using mixed methods research and suggest directions for future research.
对混合方法的应用及其批评的评述
目的-本研究论文旨在应用和批评不同领域的混合方法研究。混合方法研究(MMR)也因其概念和方法上的挑战而面临批评。因此,本研究将探讨研究的批评和克服这些问题的策略。方法-目前大多数研究工作采用混合研究方法。研究人员使用混合方法来调查单一方法无法回答的具有挑战性的研究问题。研究结果-这篇研究论文介绍了在各个领域使用混合方法研究的结果。一些批评人士认为,MMR缺乏方法上的严谨性,而且可能很耗时;另一些人承认它在提供对复杂社会现象和边缘化社区的更全面了解方面的价值。MMR已成功地用于查明学生知识的差距,探索健康和疾病中心理和生理因素之间的相互作用,并制定更有效的政策。然而,平衡定性数据的深度和定量数据的广度可能具有挑战性,从而导致妥协。实际意义-本研究的发现对各个领域的研究人员和从业人员具有重要的实际意义。它可能是有益的,特别是在教育、健康心理学和公共政策方面。建议-研究人员应该考虑使用混合方法来检查需要多方面方法的复杂研究问题。此外,它们应该结合定量和定性数据,以提供对研究问题的更完整的理解。MMR可以帮助捕捉不同的观点和经验,特别是对于代表性不足的人群,提供对社会现象更细致入微的理解。这些建议强调了使用混合方法研究的潜在好处,并为未来的研究提出了方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信