Inhibin A may be the Black Horse for Determination of the Optimal Triggering Time and Decision-making for Oocyte Retrieval

yousef Abdel Zaher, Omnia Habashy, Hamasat Alnoury, Wagdy Amer
{"title":"Inhibin A may be the Black Horse for Determination of the Optimal Triggering Time and Decision-making for Oocyte Retrieval","authors":"yousef Abdel Zaher, Omnia Habashy, Hamasat Alnoury, Wagdy Amer","doi":"10.21608/egyfs.2023.320852","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Assessment of the applicability of estimated serum inhibin A (INHA) and/or INHB versus estradiol (E2) levels to determine the triggering time during controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) that might allow the retrieval of the optimal number of oocytes. Patients: 196 infertile women assigned to receive COS for ELISA estimation of serum levels of E2 and INHs on day-2 of the cycle and on the day of retrieval depending on having serum E2 levels >2000 pg/ml and the optimal The study outcome is the blinded distinguishing ability of estimated serum levels of E2 and INHs between cases that might have <11, 11-13, and 14-15 mature follicles on transvaginal ultrasonography (TUV) imaging on the day of triggering. Results: Serum E2 levels at the time of triggering (>2000 differentiation between patients according to the number of mature follicles compared to serum E2 and INHB differentiating patients had <11 or >14 mature follicles, while E2 and INHB failed for this respect. Statistical for canceling depending on the maturation of a low number of follicles after COS and for the presence of 14-15 mature follicles and deciding triggering and oocyte retrieval. Conclusion: Estimation of serum E2 is an unreliable marker for differentiating women according to several","PeriodicalId":481729,"journal":{"name":"The Egyptian Journal of Fertility and Sterility","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Egyptian Journal of Fertility and Sterility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/egyfs.2023.320852","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Assessment of the applicability of estimated serum inhibin A (INHA) and/or INHB versus estradiol (E2) levels to determine the triggering time during controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) that might allow the retrieval of the optimal number of oocytes. Patients: 196 infertile women assigned to receive COS for ELISA estimation of serum levels of E2 and INHs on day-2 of the cycle and on the day of retrieval depending on having serum E2 levels >2000 pg/ml and the optimal The study outcome is the blinded distinguishing ability of estimated serum levels of E2 and INHs between cases that might have <11, 11-13, and 14-15 mature follicles on transvaginal ultrasonography (TUV) imaging on the day of triggering. Results: Serum E2 levels at the time of triggering (>2000 differentiation between patients according to the number of mature follicles compared to serum E2 and INHB differentiating patients had <11 or >14 mature follicles, while E2 and INHB failed for this respect. Statistical for canceling depending on the maturation of a low number of follicles after COS and for the presence of 14-15 mature follicles and deciding triggering and oocyte retrieval. Conclusion: Estimation of serum E2 is an unreliable marker for differentiating women according to several
抑制素A可能是确定卵母细胞回收最佳触发时间和决策的黑马
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信