Substantive Equality and Its Remedial Consequences

IF 0.7 4区 社会学 Q2 LAW
Sabine Tsuruda
{"title":"Substantive Equality and Its Remedial Consequences","authors":"Sabine Tsuruda","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2023-0073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In ‘Equality, Equity, and Algorithms: Learning from Justice Rosalie Abella,’ Martha Minow illustrates the practical import of Abella J’s equality jurisprudence by way of a contrast to US anti-discrimination law. Whereas US anti-discrimination law deploys a largely formal conception of equality focused on discriminator conduct, Abella J’s jurisprudence deploys a contextual and impact-centred conception of substantive equality. After highlighting key philosophical differences between these two conceptions of equality, this article considers whether substantive equality’s focus on impact, in contrast to the US focus on conduct, limits the law’s potential to condemn discrimination as a serious wrong.","PeriodicalId":46289,"journal":{"name":"University of Toronto Law Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Toronto Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/utlj-2023-0073","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In ‘Equality, Equity, and Algorithms: Learning from Justice Rosalie Abella,’ Martha Minow illustrates the practical import of Abella J’s equality jurisprudence by way of a contrast to US anti-discrimination law. Whereas US anti-discrimination law deploys a largely formal conception of equality focused on discriminator conduct, Abella J’s jurisprudence deploys a contextual and impact-centred conception of substantive equality. After highlighting key philosophical differences between these two conceptions of equality, this article considers whether substantive equality’s focus on impact, in contrast to the US focus on conduct, limits the law’s potential to condemn discrimination as a serious wrong.
实质平等及其补救后果
在《平等、公平和算法:向罗莎莉·阿贝拉法官学习》一书中,玛莎·米诺通过与美国反歧视法的对比,说明了阿贝拉法官的平等法理的实际意义。美国的反歧视法在很大程度上采用了以歧视行为为重点的正式平等概念,而Abella J的法理则采用了以语境和影响为中心的实质性平等概念。在强调了这两种平等概念之间的主要哲学差异之后,本文考虑实质性平等对影响的关注,与美国对行为的关注相反,是否限制了法律将歧视视为严重错误的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
26
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信