Feedback digitalization preferences in online and hybrid classroom: Experiences from lockdown and implications for post-pandemic education

Gayane Sedrakyan, Simone Borsci, Asad Abdi, Stéphanie M. van den Berg, Bernard P. Veldkamp, Jos van Hillegersberg
{"title":"Feedback digitalization preferences in online and hybrid classroom: Experiences from lockdown and implications for post-pandemic education","authors":"Gayane Sedrakyan, Simone Borsci, Asad Abdi, Stéphanie M. van den Berg, Bernard P. Veldkamp, Jos van Hillegersberg","doi":"10.1108/jrit-02-2023-0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose This research aims to explore digital feedback needs/preferences in online education during lockdown and the implications for post-pandemic education. Design/methodology/approach An empirical study approach was used to explore feedback needs and experiences from educational institutions in the Netherlands and Germany (N = 247) using a survey method. Findings The results showed that instruments supporting features for effortless interactivity are among the highly preferred options for giving/receiving feedback in online/hybrid classrooms, which are in addition also opted for post-pandemic education. The analysis also showed that, when communicating feedback digitally, more inclusive formats are preferred, e.g. informing learners about how they perform compared to peers. The increased need for comparative performance-oriented feedback, however, may affect students' goal orientations. In general, the results of this study suggest that while interactivity features of online instruments are key to ensuring social presence when using digital forms of feedback, balancing online with offline approaches should be recommended. Originality/value This research contributes to the gap in the scientific literature on feedback digitalization. Most of the existing research are in the domain of automated feedback generated by various learning environments, while literature on digital feedback in online classrooms, e.g. empirical studies on preferences for typology, formats and communication channels for digital feedback, to the best of the authors’ knowledge is largely lacking. The findings and recommendations of this study extend their relevance to post-pandemic education for which hybrid classroom is opted among the highly preferred formats by survey respondents.","PeriodicalId":484152,"journal":{"name":"Journal of research in innovative teaching & learning","volume":"43 4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of research in innovative teaching & learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jrit-02-2023-0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This research aims to explore digital feedback needs/preferences in online education during lockdown and the implications for post-pandemic education. Design/methodology/approach An empirical study approach was used to explore feedback needs and experiences from educational institutions in the Netherlands and Germany (N = 247) using a survey method. Findings The results showed that instruments supporting features for effortless interactivity are among the highly preferred options for giving/receiving feedback in online/hybrid classrooms, which are in addition also opted for post-pandemic education. The analysis also showed that, when communicating feedback digitally, more inclusive formats are preferred, e.g. informing learners about how they perform compared to peers. The increased need for comparative performance-oriented feedback, however, may affect students' goal orientations. In general, the results of this study suggest that while interactivity features of online instruments are key to ensuring social presence when using digital forms of feedback, balancing online with offline approaches should be recommended. Originality/value This research contributes to the gap in the scientific literature on feedback digitalization. Most of the existing research are in the domain of automated feedback generated by various learning environments, while literature on digital feedback in online classrooms, e.g. empirical studies on preferences for typology, formats and communication channels for digital feedback, to the best of the authors’ knowledge is largely lacking. The findings and recommendations of this study extend their relevance to post-pandemic education for which hybrid classroom is opted among the highly preferred formats by survey respondents.
在线和混合课堂的反馈数字化偏好:封锁的经验及其对大流行后教育的影响
本研究旨在探讨封锁期间在线教育的数字反馈需求/偏好及其对大流行后教育的影响。设计/方法/方法:采用实证研究方法,采用调查法,从荷兰和德国(N = 247)的教育机构中探索反馈需求和经验。结果表明,支持轻松互动功能的工具是在在线/混合教室中提供/接收反馈的高度首选选项之一,此外,大流行后教育也选择了这些工具。分析还表明,在以数字方式传达反馈时,更倾向于采用更具包容性的形式,例如告知学习者他们与同龄人相比的表现如何。然而,对比较绩效导向反馈的需求增加可能会影响学生的目标导向。总的来说,本研究的结果表明,虽然在线工具的交互性特征是使用数字形式反馈时确保社交存在的关键,但应该推荐平衡在线和离线方法。原创性/价值本研究填补了反馈数字化科学文献的空白。大多数现有的研究都是在各种学习环境产生的自动反馈领域,而关于在线课堂数字反馈的文献,例如,据作者所知,关于数字反馈的类型偏好、格式和沟通渠道的实证研究在很大程度上是缺乏的。这项研究的结果和建议扩大了它们与大流行后教育的相关性,在这种教育中,混合教室是受访者非常喜欢的形式之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信