#36076 Investigating the most difficult concepts in anaesthesia for medical students

Wan Xi Ho, Zi Xian Justin Chou, Haowen Jiang, Joselo Macachor
{"title":"#36076 Investigating the most difficult concepts in anaesthesia for medical students","authors":"Wan Xi Ho, Zi Xian Justin Chou, Haowen Jiang, Joselo Macachor","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2023-esra.399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3></h3> <b>Please confirm that an ethics committee approval has been applied for or granted:</b> Not relevant (see information at the bottom of this page) <h3>Background and Aims</h3> In clinical postings, time for teaching is limited. To maximize effectiveness, educators should prioritize teaching topics that students struggle to learn independently. We surveyed medical students to identify these topics and better inform lesson planning. <h3>Methods</h3> We derived the anaesthesiology curriculum from the textbook ‘Anesthesiology Student Survival Guide’. With input from an anaesthetist educator and a pilot survey, we identified the 5 most important and challenging concepts from major topics including Pharmacology &amp; Physiology, Intensive Care, Peri-operative Care, and Traditional Anaesthesia. We then asked clinical year medical students at the Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Singapore to rate the concepts (1 to 5, 5 indicating extreme difficulty). We also surveyed why they found these concepts challenging and how they overcame the difficulties. <h3>Results</h3> We received 139 out of a maximum of 394 responses (35.3% response rate), yielding a margin of error of ±6.70% at the 95% confidence interval. The hardest concepts are as follows (with scoring): Pharmacology &amp; Physiology: Pharmacokinetics of anticoagulants (3.25/5), context sensitive half- life (3.56/5) Intensive Care: Approach to hypo/hyperthermia (3.34/5) Peri-operative Care: Capnograph interpretation (3.06/5), minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) (3.47/5) Traditional Anaesthesia: Neuromuscular blocking agents (3.12/5), nerve block anatomy (3.56/5) For intensive care, lack of practice was the main challenge, while for the other topics, it was difficulty understanding the concepts. The most effective learning method for all topics was a teaching by someone else. <h3>Conclusions</h3> Our study identifies key anaesthesiology topics and effective teaching strategies for educators, helping to optimize limited clinical posting time and improve student understanding.","PeriodicalId":80519,"journal":{"name":"Archaeologia aeliana, or, Miscellaneous tracts relating to antiquity","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archaeologia aeliana, or, Miscellaneous tracts relating to antiquity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2023-esra.399","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Please confirm that an ethics committee approval has been applied for or granted: Not relevant (see information at the bottom of this page)

Background and Aims

In clinical postings, time for teaching is limited. To maximize effectiveness, educators should prioritize teaching topics that students struggle to learn independently. We surveyed medical students to identify these topics and better inform lesson planning.

Methods

We derived the anaesthesiology curriculum from the textbook ‘Anesthesiology Student Survival Guide’. With input from an anaesthetist educator and a pilot survey, we identified the 5 most important and challenging concepts from major topics including Pharmacology & Physiology, Intensive Care, Peri-operative Care, and Traditional Anaesthesia. We then asked clinical year medical students at the Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Singapore to rate the concepts (1 to 5, 5 indicating extreme difficulty). We also surveyed why they found these concepts challenging and how they overcame the difficulties.

Results

We received 139 out of a maximum of 394 responses (35.3% response rate), yielding a margin of error of ±6.70% at the 95% confidence interval. The hardest concepts are as follows (with scoring): Pharmacology & Physiology: Pharmacokinetics of anticoagulants (3.25/5), context sensitive half- life (3.56/5) Intensive Care: Approach to hypo/hyperthermia (3.34/5) Peri-operative Care: Capnograph interpretation (3.06/5), minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) (3.47/5) Traditional Anaesthesia: Neuromuscular blocking agents (3.12/5), nerve block anatomy (3.56/5) For intensive care, lack of practice was the main challenge, while for the other topics, it was difficulty understanding the concepts. The most effective learning method for all topics was a teaching by someone else.

Conclusions

Our study identifies key anaesthesiology topics and effective teaching strategies for educators, helping to optimize limited clinical posting time and improve student understanding.
#36076为医学生调查麻醉中最困难的概念
请确认已申请或授予伦理委员会批准:不相关(见本页底部信息)背景和目的在临床岗位上,教学时间有限。为了最大限度地提高教学效果,教育者应该优先考虑学生难以独立学习的课程。我们对医学生进行了调查,以确定这些主题,并更好地为课程规划提供信息。方法从《麻醉学学生生存指南》教材中提取麻醉学课程。根据麻醉师教育工作者的意见和试点调查,我们从主要主题中确定了5个最重要和最具挑战性的概念,包括药理学;生理学,重症监护,围手术期护理和传统麻醉。然后,我们请新加坡李光前医学院的临床医科学生对这些概念进行评分(1到5,5表示极度困难)。我们还调查了他们为什么觉得这些概念具有挑战性,以及他们是如何克服困难的。结果394份问卷中,我们收到了139份(回复率为35.3%),95%置信区间的误差范围为±6.70%。最难的概念如下(有评分):药理学;生理学:抗凝血药代动力学(3.25/5),环境敏感半生期(3.56/5)重症监护:低/高热治疗方法(3.34/5)围手术期护理:Capnograph解释(3.06/5),最小肺泡浓度(MAC)(3.47/5)传统麻醉:神经肌肉阻滞剂(3.12/5),神经阻滞解剖学(3.56/5)对于重症监护来说,缺乏实践是主要的挑战,而对于其他主题,则很难理解概念。所有科目最有效的学习方法是别人教。结论本研究确定了麻醉学的关键主题和有效的教学策略,有助于优化有限的临床上岗时间,提高学生的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信