Native flora receive more visits than exotics from bees, especially native bees, in an urbanised biodiversity hotspot

IF 1.6 Q3 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Kit S. Prendergast
{"title":"Native flora receive more visits than exotics from bees, especially native bees, in an urbanised biodiversity hotspot","authors":"Kit S. Prendergast","doi":"10.1071/pc22033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context Identifying floral resources preferred by bee assemblages is important for their conservation.Aims Here, I assess the association of flowering plant community composition, with that of honey bees and native bee abundance and diversity. I investigate flower preferences in terms of plant origin (native or exotic), and evaluate niche breadth, of introduced honey bees and native bee taxa. I also consider if habitat influences these patterns.Methods This was evaluated through recording flower visitation by honey bees and native bees in the urbanised region of the south-west Western Australian Floristic Region in seven bushland remnants and seven residential gardens over 2years.Key results Both native bees and honey bees visited more native than exotic flora, however native bees visited a higher proportion of native flora than honey bees. The 10-most visited plants by native bees were exclusively native, whereas for honey bees, although their 10-most visited plants were predominantly native plant species, this selection also included exotic plant species. Niche breadth was broader in bushland remnants, indicating a greater range of preferred flora in bushland remnants. Honey bees however visited more plant families in residential gardens. With increased honey bee abundance, this was associated with native bees expanding their niche breadth, which may be a response to reduce competition. Flower preference patterns and niche breadth often differed between habitats, indicating that foraging patterns may be mediated by habitat context.Conclusion Native flora are preferred by bees, and native bees have relatively restricted flower preferences, especially compared with honey bees.Implications High proportions of preferred native flora are needed to support diverse native bee assemblages in urban areas.","PeriodicalId":38939,"journal":{"name":"Pacific Conservation Biology","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pacific Conservation Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/pc22033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Context Identifying floral resources preferred by bee assemblages is important for their conservation.Aims Here, I assess the association of flowering plant community composition, with that of honey bees and native bee abundance and diversity. I investigate flower preferences in terms of plant origin (native or exotic), and evaluate niche breadth, of introduced honey bees and native bee taxa. I also consider if habitat influences these patterns.Methods This was evaluated through recording flower visitation by honey bees and native bees in the urbanised region of the south-west Western Australian Floristic Region in seven bushland remnants and seven residential gardens over 2years.Key results Both native bees and honey bees visited more native than exotic flora, however native bees visited a higher proportion of native flora than honey bees. The 10-most visited plants by native bees were exclusively native, whereas for honey bees, although their 10-most visited plants were predominantly native plant species, this selection also included exotic plant species. Niche breadth was broader in bushland remnants, indicating a greater range of preferred flora in bushland remnants. Honey bees however visited more plant families in residential gardens. With increased honey bee abundance, this was associated with native bees expanding their niche breadth, which may be a response to reduce competition. Flower preference patterns and niche breadth often differed between habitats, indicating that foraging patterns may be mediated by habitat context.Conclusion Native flora are preferred by bees, and native bees have relatively restricted flower preferences, especially compared with honey bees.Implications High proportions of preferred native flora are needed to support diverse native bee assemblages in urban areas.
在一个城市化的生物多样性热点地区,本地植物比外来蜜蜂,尤其是本地蜜蜂,受到更多的访问
鉴定蜜蜂组合偏好的花资源对其保护具有重要意义。目的评价开花植物群落组成与蜜蜂和本地蜜蜂丰度和多样性的关系。我从植物来源(本地或外来)的角度研究了花的偏好,并评估了引进蜜蜂和本地蜜蜂分类群的生态位宽度。我也会考虑栖息地是否会影响这些模式。方法在西澳西南植物区城市化地区的7个丛林遗址和7个住宅花园中,对蜜蜂和本地蜜蜂的访花行为进行了2年的记录。本地蜜蜂和蜜蜂对本地植物的访问比外来植物多,但本地蜜蜂对本地植物的访问比例高于蜜蜂。本地蜜蜂最常访问的10种植物完全是本地植物,而对于蜜蜂来说,尽管它们最常访问的10种植物主要是本地植物,但这种选择也包括外来植物。群落的生态位宽度较宽,表明群落的优先区系范围较大。然而,蜜蜂在住宅花园中拜访了更多的植物家族。随着蜜蜂数量的增加,这与本地蜜蜂扩大其生态位宽度有关,这可能是对减少竞争的反应。不同生境的花偏好模式和生态位宽度存在差异,表明采食模式可能受生境环境的调节。结论蜜蜂偏爱本地植物群,而本地蜜蜂对花的偏好相对有限,尤其是与蜜蜂相比。城市地区需要高比例的首选原生植物群来支持多样化的原生蜜蜂群落。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pacific Conservation Biology
Pacific Conservation Biology Environmental Science-Nature and Landscape Conservation
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Pacific Conservation Biology provides an important discussion forum for regional conservation issues, debate about management priorities, and dissemination of research results. The journal publishes original research, reviews, perspectives and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信