Deep carbonate reservoir characterization using multi seismic attributes:A comparison of unsupervised machine learning approaches

IF 3 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Geophysics Pub Date : 2023-11-06 DOI:10.1190/geo2023-0199.1
Luanxiao Zhao, Xuanying Zhu, Xiangyuan Zhao, Yuchun You, Minghui Xu, Tengfei Wang, Jianhua Geng
{"title":"Deep carbonate reservoir characterization using multi seismic attributes:A comparison of unsupervised machine learning approaches","authors":"Luanxiao Zhao, Xuanying Zhu, Xiangyuan Zhao, Yuchun You, Minghui Xu, Tengfei Wang, Jianhua Geng","doi":"10.1190/geo2023-0199.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Seismic reservoir characterization is of great interest for sweet spot identification, reservoir quality assessment, and geological model building. The sparsity of the labeled samples often limit the application of supervised machine learning for seismic reservoir characterization. Unsupervised learning methods, on the other hand, explore the internal structure of data and extract low-dimensional features of geologic interest from seismic data without the need for labels. We compare various unsupervised learning approaches, including the linear method PCA, manifold learning methods T-distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding (t-SNE) and Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP), and the Convolutional Autoencoder (CAE), on both the 3D synthetic and field seismic data of a deep carbonate reservoir, SW China. On the synthetic data, the low-dimensional features extracted by UMAP and CAE provide a better indication of porosity and gas saturation than traditional seismic attributes. In particular, UMAP better preserves the global structure of geological features, and show the potential of decoupling the gas saturation and porosity effects from seismic responses. We demonstrate that by joint use of multi type of seismic attributes instead of using single type of seismic attributes can better delineate the reservoir structures using unsupervised ML. On the field seismic data, UMAP can effectively characterize sedimentary facies distribution, which is consistent with the geological understanding. Nevertheless, the porosity and saturation can not be reliably identified from field seismic data using unsupervised ML, which is likely to be caused by the complex pore structures in carbonates complicating the mapping relationship between seismic responses and reservoir parameters.","PeriodicalId":55102,"journal":{"name":"Geophysics","volume":"181 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geophysics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2023-0199.1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Seismic reservoir characterization is of great interest for sweet spot identification, reservoir quality assessment, and geological model building. The sparsity of the labeled samples often limit the application of supervised machine learning for seismic reservoir characterization. Unsupervised learning methods, on the other hand, explore the internal structure of data and extract low-dimensional features of geologic interest from seismic data without the need for labels. We compare various unsupervised learning approaches, including the linear method PCA, manifold learning methods T-distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding (t-SNE) and Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP), and the Convolutional Autoencoder (CAE), on both the 3D synthetic and field seismic data of a deep carbonate reservoir, SW China. On the synthetic data, the low-dimensional features extracted by UMAP and CAE provide a better indication of porosity and gas saturation than traditional seismic attributes. In particular, UMAP better preserves the global structure of geological features, and show the potential of decoupling the gas saturation and porosity effects from seismic responses. We demonstrate that by joint use of multi type of seismic attributes instead of using single type of seismic attributes can better delineate the reservoir structures using unsupervised ML. On the field seismic data, UMAP can effectively characterize sedimentary facies distribution, which is consistent with the geological understanding. Nevertheless, the porosity and saturation can not be reliably identified from field seismic data using unsupervised ML, which is likely to be caused by the complex pore structures in carbonates complicating the mapping relationship between seismic responses and reservoir parameters.
利用多地震属性描述深层碳酸盐岩储层:无监督机器学习方法的比较
地震储层表征对于甜点识别、储层质量评价和地质模型建立具有重要意义。标记样本的稀疏性通常限制了监督机器学习在地震储层表征中的应用。另一方面,无监督学习方法在不需要标签的情况下,探索数据的内部结构,从地震数据中提取地质兴趣的低维特征。针对中国西南某碳酸盐岩深层储层的三维合成地震数据和现场地震数据,我们比较了各种无监督学习方法,包括线性方法PCA、流形学习方法t-分布随机近邻嵌入(t-SNE)和均匀流形逼近与投影(UMAP),以及卷积自编码器(CAE)。在综合数据上,UMAP和CAE提取的低维特征比传统的地震属性更能反映孔隙度和含气饱和度。特别是,UMAP更好地保留了地质特征的整体结构,并显示出将气饱和度和孔隙度影响与地震响应解耦的潜力。研究结果表明,联合使用多类型地震属性而非单一类型地震属性可以更好地圈定储层结构,在现场地震数据上,UMAP可以有效地表征沉积相分布,与地质认识一致。然而,由于碳酸盐岩孔隙结构复杂,使得地震响应与储层参数之间的映射关系变得复杂,因此利用无监督机器学习无法从现场地震数据中可靠地识别孔隙度和饱和度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geophysics
Geophysics 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
18.20%
发文量
354
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Geophysics, published by the Society of Exploration Geophysicists since 1936, is an archival journal encompassing all aspects of research, exploration, and education in applied geophysics. Geophysics articles, generally more than 275 per year in six issues, cover the entire spectrum of geophysical methods, including seismology, potential fields, electromagnetics, and borehole measurements. Geophysics, a bimonthly, provides theoretical and mathematical tools needed to reproduce depicted work, encouraging further development and research. Geophysics papers, drawn from industry and academia, undergo a rigorous peer-review process to validate the described methods and conclusions and ensure the highest editorial and production quality. Geophysics editors strongly encourage the use of real data, including actual case histories, to highlight current technology and tutorials to stimulate ideas. Some issues feature a section of solicited papers on a particular subject of current interest. Recent special sections focused on seismic anisotropy, subsalt exploration and development, and microseismic monitoring. The PDF format of each Geophysics paper is the official version of record.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信