The High-Level Practical Overview of Open-Source Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning Solutions

IF 0.5 Q4 TELECOMMUNICATIONS
{"title":"The High-Level Practical Overview of Open-Source Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning Solutions","authors":"","doi":"10.24425/ijet.2022.143880","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"—This paper aims to provide a high-level overview of practical approaches to machine-learning respecting the privacy and confidentiality of customer information, which is called Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning . First, the security approaches in offline-learning privacy methods are assessed. Those focused on modern cryptographic methods, such as Homomor-phic Encryption and Secure Multi-Party Computation , as well as on dedicated combined hardware and software platforms like Trusted Execution Environment - Intel ® Software Guard Extensions (Intel ® SGX) . Combining the security approaches with different machine learning architectures leads to our Proof of Concept in which the accuracy and speed of the security solutions will be examined. The next step was exploring and comparing the Open-Source Python -based solutions for PPML . Four solutions were selected from almost 40 separate, state-of-the-art systems: SyMPC , TF-Encrypted , TenSEAL , and Gramine . Three different Neural Network architectures were designed to show different libraries’ capabilities. The POC solves the image classification problem based on the MNIST dataset. As the computational results show, the accuracy of all considered secure approaches is similar. The maximum difference between non-secure and secure flow does not exceed 1.2%. In terms of secure computations, the most effective Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning library is based on Trusted Execution Environment , followed by Secure Multi-Party Computation and Homomorphic Encryption . However, most of those are at least 1000 times slower than the non-secure evaluation. Unfortunately, it is not acceptable for a real-world scenario. Future work could combine different security approaches, explore other new and existing state-of-the-art libraries or implement support for hardware-accelerated secure computation.","PeriodicalId":13922,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Electronics and Telecommunications","volume":"294 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Electronics and Telecommunications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24425/ijet.2022.143880","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"TELECOMMUNICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

—This paper aims to provide a high-level overview of practical approaches to machine-learning respecting the privacy and confidentiality of customer information, which is called Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning . First, the security approaches in offline-learning privacy methods are assessed. Those focused on modern cryptographic methods, such as Homomor-phic Encryption and Secure Multi-Party Computation , as well as on dedicated combined hardware and software platforms like Trusted Execution Environment - Intel ® Software Guard Extensions (Intel ® SGX) . Combining the security approaches with different machine learning architectures leads to our Proof of Concept in which the accuracy and speed of the security solutions will be examined. The next step was exploring and comparing the Open-Source Python -based solutions for PPML . Four solutions were selected from almost 40 separate, state-of-the-art systems: SyMPC , TF-Encrypted , TenSEAL , and Gramine . Three different Neural Network architectures were designed to show different libraries’ capabilities. The POC solves the image classification problem based on the MNIST dataset. As the computational results show, the accuracy of all considered secure approaches is similar. The maximum difference between non-secure and secure flow does not exceed 1.2%. In terms of secure computations, the most effective Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning library is based on Trusted Execution Environment , followed by Secure Multi-Party Computation and Homomorphic Encryption . However, most of those are at least 1000 times slower than the non-secure evaluation. Unfortunately, it is not acceptable for a real-world scenario. Future work could combine different security approaches, explore other new and existing state-of-the-art libraries or implement support for hardware-accelerated secure computation.
开源隐私保护机器学习解决方案的高级实用概述
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信