Combination of optimal three-step composite time integration method with multi-point iterative methods for geometric nonlinear structural dynamics

IF 3 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Mojtaba Shahraki, Farzad Shahabian, Ali Maghami
{"title":"Combination of optimal three-step composite time integration method with multi-point iterative methods for geometric nonlinear structural dynamics","authors":"Mojtaba Shahraki, Farzad Shahabian, Ali Maghami","doi":"10.1142/s0219455424501566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study focuses on solving the geometric nonlinear dynamic equations of structures using the multi-point iterative methods within the optimal three-step composite time integration method (OTCTIM). The OTCTIM, initially devised for linear dynamic systems, is now proposed to encompass nonlinear dynamic systems in such a way that the semi-static nonlinear equations in time sub-steps can be solved using multi-point methods. The Weerakoon–Fernando method (WFM), Homeier method (HM), Jarrat method (JM), and Darvishi–Barati method (DBM) have been extended as multi-point solvers for nonlinear equations in OTCTIM, which exhibit a higher convergence order than the Newton–Raphson method (NRM), without requiring the calculation of second and higher derivatives. Several structural examples were solved to examine the performance of these methods in the OTCTIM approach. The results demonstrated that the multi-point iterative methods outperform NRM (in terms of the number of iterations) within the OTCTIM for geometric nonlinear structural dynamics and, among the multi-point methods, the JM and DBM converged with fewer number of iterations and lower error levels. Furthermore, it has been observed that when solving nonlinear dynamic equations for structures with a high number of degrees of freedom, the incorporation of the DBM into the OTCTIM mitigates the convergence iterations and the average elapsed time for iterative sub-steps.","PeriodicalId":54939,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219455424501566","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study focuses on solving the geometric nonlinear dynamic equations of structures using the multi-point iterative methods within the optimal three-step composite time integration method (OTCTIM). The OTCTIM, initially devised for linear dynamic systems, is now proposed to encompass nonlinear dynamic systems in such a way that the semi-static nonlinear equations in time sub-steps can be solved using multi-point methods. The Weerakoon–Fernando method (WFM), Homeier method (HM), Jarrat method (JM), and Darvishi–Barati method (DBM) have been extended as multi-point solvers for nonlinear equations in OTCTIM, which exhibit a higher convergence order than the Newton–Raphson method (NRM), without requiring the calculation of second and higher derivatives. Several structural examples were solved to examine the performance of these methods in the OTCTIM approach. The results demonstrated that the multi-point iterative methods outperform NRM (in terms of the number of iterations) within the OTCTIM for geometric nonlinear structural dynamics and, among the multi-point methods, the JM and DBM converged with fewer number of iterations and lower error levels. Furthermore, it has been observed that when solving nonlinear dynamic equations for structures with a high number of degrees of freedom, the incorporation of the DBM into the OTCTIM mitigates the convergence iterations and the average elapsed time for iterative sub-steps.
几何非线性结构动力学的最优三步复合时间积分法与多点迭代法的结合
研究了最优三步复合时间积分法(OTCTIM)中的多点迭代法求解结构的几何非线性动力方程。OTCTIM最初是为线性动力系统设计的,现在被提出用于非线性动力系统,以便用多点方法求解时间子步长的半静态非线性方程。Weerakoon-Fernando方法(WFM)、Homeier方法(HM)、Jarrat方法(JM)和Darvishi-Barati方法(DBM)在OTCTIM中被推广为非线性方程的多点求解方法,它们具有比Newton-Raphson方法(NRM)更高的收敛阶,且不需要计算二阶导数和高阶导数。通过求解几个结构实例来检验这些方法在OTCTIM方法中的性能。结果表明,在OTCTIM中,多点迭代方法在几何非线性结构动力学方面优于NRM(在迭代次数方面),并且在多点迭代方法中,JM和DBM的收敛次数更少,误差水平更低。此外,在求解具有多个自由度的结构的非线性动力学方程时,将DBM纳入OTCTIM可以减轻迭代子步骤的收敛迭代和平均消耗时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
38.90%
发文量
291
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: The aim of this journal is to provide a unique forum for the publication and rapid dissemination of original research on stability and dynamics of structures. Papers that deal with conventional land-based structures, aerospace structures, marine structures, as well as biostructures and micro- and nano-structures are considered. Papers devoted to all aspects of structural stability and dynamics (both transient and vibration response), ranging from mathematical formulations, novel methods of solutions, to experimental investigations and practical applications in civil, mechanical, aerospace, marine, bio- and nano-engineering will be published. The important subjects of structural stability and structural dynamics are placed together in this journal because they share somewhat fundamental elements. In recognition of the considerable research interests and recent proliferation of papers in these subjects, it is hoped that the journal may help bring together papers focused on related subjects, including the state-of-the-art surveys, so as to provide a more effective medium for disseminating the latest developments to researchers and engineers. This journal features a section for technical notes that allows researchers to publish their initial findings or new ideas more speedily. Discussions of papers and concepts will also be published so that researchers can have a vibrant and timely communication with others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信