Social citizenship as a marble cake: The changing pattern of right production and the role of the EU

IF 2.7 1区 社会学 Q2 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
Maurizio Ferrera, Francesco Corti, Maarten Keune
{"title":"Social citizenship as a marble cake: The changing pattern of right production and the role of the EU","authors":"Maurizio Ferrera, Francesco Corti, Maarten Keune","doi":"10.1177/09589287231207333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The launch of the European Pillar of Social Rights has reinvigorated the debate on the role that the European Union can exercise in the sphere of subjective rights. Such debate has traditionally focused on the limits of the current social acquis, considered unable to create fully-fledged European social citizenship, that ultimately remains limited to the right to reside and freely move within the EU and enjoy social rights as nationals. Conversely, this article argues that the gradual expansion of the EU’s social acquis has slowly but clearly started to disconnect social rights from their exclusive national foundations, leading to the emergence of a new marble cake pattern of right production, which to a large extent reproduces the trajectory of federal polities. To capture this development, this article proposes an original analytical framework to dissect the notion of social rights as bundles of power resources (normative, instrumental and enforcement), which enable individuals to claim and actually receive material benefits in order to cope with a codified array of risks and needs. By shifting the attention from the formal dimension (laws and their enforcement) to its concrete practice (access and outputs), our conception connects the concept of social citizenship more directly to what ultimately matters for life chances (individualised material benefits) as well as for the social and political bonds of a community (the rights-based claim and experience of social protection). In so doing, we move beyond the boundaries of the nation-state as the only producer of social entitlements and are able to appreciate the increasing relevance of the European Union as a provider of power resources and guarantor of policy outputs.","PeriodicalId":47919,"journal":{"name":"Journal of European Social Policy","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of European Social Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09589287231207333","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The launch of the European Pillar of Social Rights has reinvigorated the debate on the role that the European Union can exercise in the sphere of subjective rights. Such debate has traditionally focused on the limits of the current social acquis, considered unable to create fully-fledged European social citizenship, that ultimately remains limited to the right to reside and freely move within the EU and enjoy social rights as nationals. Conversely, this article argues that the gradual expansion of the EU’s social acquis has slowly but clearly started to disconnect social rights from their exclusive national foundations, leading to the emergence of a new marble cake pattern of right production, which to a large extent reproduces the trajectory of federal polities. To capture this development, this article proposes an original analytical framework to dissect the notion of social rights as bundles of power resources (normative, instrumental and enforcement), which enable individuals to claim and actually receive material benefits in order to cope with a codified array of risks and needs. By shifting the attention from the formal dimension (laws and their enforcement) to its concrete practice (access and outputs), our conception connects the concept of social citizenship more directly to what ultimately matters for life chances (individualised material benefits) as well as for the social and political bonds of a community (the rights-based claim and experience of social protection). In so doing, we move beyond the boundaries of the nation-state as the only producer of social entitlements and are able to appreciate the increasing relevance of the European Union as a provider of power resources and guarantor of policy outputs.
作为大理石蛋糕的社会公民:权利生产模式的变化与欧盟的角色
欧洲社会权利支柱的发起重新激发了关于欧洲联盟在主观权利领域可以发挥的作用的辩论。传统上,这类辩论的焦点是当前社会获得性的限制,被认为无法创造出完全成熟的欧洲社会公民身份,最终仍将局限于在欧盟内部居住和自由流动的权利,以及作为国民享受社会权利的权利。与此相反,本文认为,欧盟社会资产的逐渐扩张已经缓慢而明确地开始将社会权利与其独有的国家基础分离开来,导致一种新的权利生产的大理石蛋糕模式的出现,这在很大程度上再现了联邦政策的轨迹。为了抓住这一发展,本文提出了一个原始的分析框架,以剖析社会权利作为权力资源束(规范性,工具性和强制性)的概念,使个人能够要求并实际获得物质利益,以应对一系列成文的风险和需求。通过将注意力从形式维度(法律及其执行)转移到具体实践(获取和产出),我们的概念将社会公民的概念更直接地联系到最终对生活机会(个性化的物质利益)以及社区的社会和政治纽带(基于权利的要求和社会保护的经验)至关重要的东西。在这样做的过程中,我们超越了民族国家作为社会权利的唯一生产者的界限,并能够认识到欧盟作为权力资源的提供者和政策产出的担保人的日益重要的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The Journal of European Social Policy publishes articles on all aspects of social policy in Europe. Papers should make a contribution to understanding and knowledge in the field, and we particularly welcome scholarly papers which integrate innovative theoretical insights and rigorous empirical analysis, as well as those which use or develop new methodological approaches. The Journal is interdisciplinary in scope and both social policy and Europe are conceptualized broadly. Articles may address multi-level policy making in the European Union and elsewhere; provide cross-national comparative studies; and include comparisons with areas outside Europe.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信