Indirect Determination of the Internal Diameter of Glass Conical Volumetric Instruments

Omar Jair Purata Sifuentes
{"title":"Indirect Determination of the Internal Diameter of Glass Conical Volumetric Instruments","authors":"Omar Jair Purata Sifuentes","doi":"10.22201/enesl.20078064e.2023.25.85557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To determine the values of the internal diameter in conical-shaped glass volumetric instruments using height measurements, without needing to measure the wall thickness of the volumetric container, which will allow calculating the contribution to the uncertainty of volume measurement due to the adjustment of the meniscus. Methodological design: The proposed method approximates volume by a series of truncated cones bounded by instrument graduation lines. The series of truncated cones thus defined is subject to comply with a geometric restriction. Then, for the graduation lines of the volumetric instrument that did not adhere to the constraint, a power regression model allows approximation of the value of the internal diameter. Results: The proposed approach could be used as an alternative method to determine the internal diameter of glass conical volumetric instruments in cases where using a vernier caliper or optical comparator is not an option, either because the geometry of the conical instrument does not allow it or because higher cost instruments are not available. Research limitations: Only two types of conical volumetric instruments were tested: an Imhoff cone and a centrifuge tube, with scopes of 1 L and 100 mL, respectively, from only two commercial brands of laboratory glassware. The volume of the tip of the instrument was modeled up to the first graduation mark, always as a semi-ellipsoid of revolution. Findings: Comparing the direct measurement of the internal diameter of the volumetric instruments with an optical comparator, there is an average relative error below 10 %, with a maximum value below 20 % for the two different conical glass instruments studied.","PeriodicalId":474188,"journal":{"name":"Entreciencias: Diálogos en la Sociedad del Conocimiento","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Entreciencias: Diálogos en la Sociedad del Conocimiento","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22201/enesl.20078064e.2023.25.85557","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the values of the internal diameter in conical-shaped glass volumetric instruments using height measurements, without needing to measure the wall thickness of the volumetric container, which will allow calculating the contribution to the uncertainty of volume measurement due to the adjustment of the meniscus. Methodological design: The proposed method approximates volume by a series of truncated cones bounded by instrument graduation lines. The series of truncated cones thus defined is subject to comply with a geometric restriction. Then, for the graduation lines of the volumetric instrument that did not adhere to the constraint, a power regression model allows approximation of the value of the internal diameter. Results: The proposed approach could be used as an alternative method to determine the internal diameter of glass conical volumetric instruments in cases where using a vernier caliper or optical comparator is not an option, either because the geometry of the conical instrument does not allow it or because higher cost instruments are not available. Research limitations: Only two types of conical volumetric instruments were tested: an Imhoff cone and a centrifuge tube, with scopes of 1 L and 100 mL, respectively, from only two commercial brands of laboratory glassware. The volume of the tip of the instrument was modeled up to the first graduation mark, always as a semi-ellipsoid of revolution. Findings: Comparing the direct measurement of the internal diameter of the volumetric instruments with an optical comparator, there is an average relative error below 10 %, with a maximum value below 20 % for the two different conical glass instruments studied.
玻璃锥形容积仪内径的间接测定
目的:利用高度测量来确定锥形玻璃容积仪的内径值,而不需要测量容积容器的壁厚,这将允许计算由于半月板调整而导致的体积测量不确定度的贡献。方法设计:提出的方法通过一系列由仪器分度线包围的截锥体近似体积。这样定义的一系列截锥服从于一个几何限制。然后,对于不遵守约束的体积仪的分度线,幂回归模型允许内径值的近似值。结果:在使用游标卡尺或光学比较器无法选择的情况下,由于锥形仪器的几何形状不允许,或者由于没有更高成本的仪器,所提出的方法可作为确定玻璃锥形体积仪器内径的替代方法。研究局限:仅测试了两种类型的锥形体积仪器:Imhoff锥和离心管,分别具有1 L和100 mL的范围,来自两个商业品牌的实验室玻璃器皿。仪器尖端的体积一直建模到第一个分度标记,总是作为半椭球体的旋转。结果:用光学比较器直接测量容积仪内径,两种不同的锥形玻璃仪器的平均相对误差均在10%以下,最大误差在20%以下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信