Evaluation and results of children with Autism Spectrum Disorder using cochlear implants: an integrative literature review

Vanessa Luisa Destro Fidêncio, Joice de Moura Silva, Thayrine Morgan de Souza, Letícia Cristina Vicente, Camila da Costa Ribeiro, Débora Lüders
{"title":"Evaluation and results of children with Autism Spectrum Disorder using cochlear implants: an integrative literature review","authors":"Vanessa Luisa Destro Fidêncio, Joice de Moura Silva, Thayrine Morgan de Souza, Letícia Cristina Vicente, Camila da Costa Ribeiro, Débora Lüders","doi":"10.1590/1982-0216/20232555223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Purpose: to synthesize the evidence of available studies in the literature regarding the benefit of the cochlear implant in children with additional diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder and to verify the protocols used to validate the abilities of auditory perception and oral language of this population. Methods: an integrative literature review, searching in LILACS, MEDLINE/PubMed and SciELO databases and in the Google Scholar. Studies in Portuguese and English that assessed auditory and/or spoken language skills of children using cochlear implants with autism spectrum disorder were included. Literature Review: 16 studies were included. In 72.18% of cases, autism spectrum disorder was diagnosed when the child was already using a cochlear implant. Studies have shown limited benefit from cochlear implants for the studied population. Parents need to be oriented regarding their expectations about the use of the device. Conclusion: the benefit of using a cochlear implant for children with an additional diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder is limited and lower than the results obtained by children who do not have additional diagnoses. There is no standardized protocol for assessing auditory and language skills in this population.","PeriodicalId":53238,"journal":{"name":"Revista CEFAC","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista CEFAC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0216/20232555223","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Purpose: to synthesize the evidence of available studies in the literature regarding the benefit of the cochlear implant in children with additional diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder and to verify the protocols used to validate the abilities of auditory perception and oral language of this population. Methods: an integrative literature review, searching in LILACS, MEDLINE/PubMed and SciELO databases and in the Google Scholar. Studies in Portuguese and English that assessed auditory and/or spoken language skills of children using cochlear implants with autism spectrum disorder were included. Literature Review: 16 studies were included. In 72.18% of cases, autism spectrum disorder was diagnosed when the child was already using a cochlear implant. Studies have shown limited benefit from cochlear implants for the studied population. Parents need to be oriented regarding their expectations about the use of the device. Conclusion: the benefit of using a cochlear implant for children with an additional diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder is limited and lower than the results obtained by children who do not have additional diagnoses. There is no standardized protocol for assessing auditory and language skills in this population.
自闭症谱系障碍儿童使用人工耳蜗的评估和结果:综合文献综述
目的:综合文献中关于人工耳蜗对附加诊断为自闭症谱系障碍的儿童的益处的现有研究证据,并验证用于验证该人群听觉感知和口语能力的方案。方法:综合文献综述,检索LILACS、MEDLINE/PubMed和SciELO数据库以及Google Scholar。葡萄牙语和英语的研究评估了使用人工耳蜗的自闭症谱系障碍儿童的听觉和/或口语技能。文献综述:纳入16项研究。在72.18%的病例中,自闭症谱系障碍是在孩子已经使用人工耳蜗时被诊断出来的。研究表明,人工耳蜗对研究人群的益处有限。家长需要了解他们对设备使用的期望。结论:使用人工耳蜗对附加诊断为自闭症谱系障碍的儿童的益处是有限的,并且低于没有附加诊断的儿童所获得的结果。对于这一人群的听觉和语言技能,目前还没有标准化的评估方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信