Multicriteria decision making applied to waste recycling: comparison between THOR and THOR 2 methods

Letícia de Oliveira Gago Ramos de Souza, Lucas Vitorino, Carlos Francisco Simões Gomes, Osvaldo Luiz Gonçalves Quelhas
{"title":"Multicriteria decision making applied to waste recycling: comparison between THOR and THOR 2 methods","authors":"Letícia de Oliveira Gago Ramos de Souza, Lucas Vitorino, Carlos Francisco Simões Gomes, Osvaldo Luiz Gonçalves Quelhas","doi":"10.1590/0103-6513.20220128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Paper aims This paper aims to compare the results of the THOR2 Method, in comparison to the original THOR method, and to analyse possible rank changes between the methods, to support decision-making in the evolutionary process of waste recycling in Brazil. Originality ; Proposes a revision of the model for analysis of Waste Recycling, highlighting the vision of three decision makers individually, and later the integrated vision. Research method State of the art of the THOR and THOR2 methods, through an investigation in four databases and comparison using THORWeb. Main findings As a result of the disposal of plastic waste, reuse, mechanical recycling, chemical and incineration remained in the positions with the consumer as a decision maker. With the other decision makers there was only one significant change, where the landfill went from last to first position. Implications for theory and practice There was only one significant change when comparing methods.","PeriodicalId":263089,"journal":{"name":"Production Journal","volume":"280 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Production Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6513.20220128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Paper aims This paper aims to compare the results of the THOR2 Method, in comparison to the original THOR method, and to analyse possible rank changes between the methods, to support decision-making in the evolutionary process of waste recycling in Brazil. Originality ; Proposes a revision of the model for analysis of Waste Recycling, highlighting the vision of three decision makers individually, and later the integrated vision. Research method State of the art of the THOR and THOR2 methods, through an investigation in four databases and comparison using THORWeb. Main findings As a result of the disposal of plastic waste, reuse, mechanical recycling, chemical and incineration remained in the positions with the consumer as a decision maker. With the other decision makers there was only one significant change, where the landfill went from last to first position. Implications for theory and practice There was only one significant change when comparing methods.
多准则决策在废物回收中的应用:THOR与THOR 2方法的比较
本文的目的是将THOR2方法的结果与原来的THOR方法进行比较,并分析方法之间可能的等级变化,以支持巴西废物回收演变过程中的决策。创意;提出了对废物回收分析模型的修正,突出了三个决策者各自的视角,然后是综合视角。研究方法通过对四个数据库的调查和使用THORWeb的比较,研究了THOR和THOR2方法的研究现状。由于塑料废物的处理、再利用、机械回收、化学和焚烧仍然是消费者作为决策者的立场。其他决策者只有一个显著的变化,垃圾填埋场从最后一名变成了第一名。理论与实践的启示在比较方法时,只有一个显著的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信