COMMON AND SPECIFIC IN APPROACHES TO ENSURING SOCIETAL SECURITY AS CRISIS MANAGEMENT IN THE EU AND THE CZECH REPUBLIC DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC

V. А. Gatskovskaya
{"title":"COMMON AND SPECIFIC IN APPROACHES TO ENSURING SOCIETAL SECURITY AS CRISIS MANAGEMENT IN THE EU AND THE CZECH REPUBLIC DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC","authors":"V. А. Gatskovskaya","doi":"10.17072/2218-1067-2023-3-56-64","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The COVID-19 pandemic was a challenge for the EU as an integration association and for all its member states. To counteract the cross-border crisis triggered by the coronavirus, policies within the association and the interaction of member states had to be clearly coordinated. In reality, however, the approaches taken by member states to deal with the pandemic differed at almost every stage of it. An example of that was the Czech Republic and its unique approach to a significant number of aspects of crisis management. Using the concept of societal security as a theoretical basis, the article analyzes the threat of the COVID-19 pandemic to the EU, revealing the specifics of the Czech Republic's approach to crisis management (in comparison with the general European approach), and analyzing the public perception of the COVID-19 pandemic and the related crisis management policies at the EU and Czech Republic levels. It is concluded that the peculiarities of the approach to social security in the Czech Republic are primarily due to the peculiarities of the perception of the coronavirus as a threat, as well as to the anti-crisis policies implemented at the Czech and EU levels.","PeriodicalId":24044,"journal":{"name":"Вестник Пермского университета. Серия «Химия» = Bulletin of Perm University. CHEMISTRY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Вестник Пермского университета. Серия «Химия» = Bulletin of Perm University. CHEMISTRY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2023-3-56-64","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic was a challenge for the EU as an integration association and for all its member states. To counteract the cross-border crisis triggered by the coronavirus, policies within the association and the interaction of member states had to be clearly coordinated. In reality, however, the approaches taken by member states to deal with the pandemic differed at almost every stage of it. An example of that was the Czech Republic and its unique approach to a significant number of aspects of crisis management. Using the concept of societal security as a theoretical basis, the article analyzes the threat of the COVID-19 pandemic to the EU, revealing the specifics of the Czech Republic's approach to crisis management (in comparison with the general European approach), and analyzing the public perception of the COVID-19 pandemic and the related crisis management policies at the EU and Czech Republic levels. It is concluded that the peculiarities of the approach to social security in the Czech Republic are primarily due to the peculiarities of the perception of the coronavirus as a threat, as well as to the anti-crisis policies implemented at the Czech and EU levels.
欧盟和捷克共和国在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间确保社会安全作为危机管理的共同和具体方法
2019冠状病毒病大流行对作为一体化组织的欧盟及其所有成员国都是一项挑战。为了应对冠状病毒引发的跨境危机,该组织内部的政策和成员国之间的互动必须得到明确协调。然而,在现实中,会员国为应对这一流行病所采取的方法几乎在每一个阶段都有所不同。捷克共和国就是一个例子,它对危机管理的许多方面采取了独特的办法。本文以社会安全概念为理论基础,分析了新冠肺炎大流行对欧盟的威胁,揭示了捷克共和国危机管理方法的具体特点(与一般欧洲方法相比),并分析了公众对新冠肺炎大流行的看法以及欧盟和捷克两级的相关危机管理政策。结论是,捷克共和国社会保障方法的特殊性主要是由于将冠状病毒视为威胁的特殊性以及捷克和欧盟层面实施的反危机政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信