Personal Data of Adolescents in Higher Education: The LGPD and the Use of Digital Media for Teaching Activities and Remote Testing

IF 0.2 Q4 LAW
Thaís Duarte Zappelini, Laurianne-Marie Schippers, Alexandre Pacheco da Silva
{"title":"Personal Data of Adolescents in Higher Education: The LGPD and the Use of Digital Media for Teaching Activities and Remote Testing","authors":"Thaís Duarte Zappelini, Laurianne-Marie Schippers, Alexandre Pacheco da Silva","doi":"10.1590/2317-6172202335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract With the spread of the new Coronavirus, Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) needed to adapt to this reality. The implementation of Emergency Remote Teaching (ERT) in Brazil relied on the experiences of distance education (EaD). Also, there was a significant increase in the use of remote testing tools that rely on monitoring (e-proctoring). This context has generated several concerns regarding the protection of vulnerable data subjects. The main objective of this article is to assess the processing of adolescents’ personal data by HEIs in the context of teaching activities carried out by digital means and the use of remote testing that include the collection of sensitive data. For this purpose, we aim to analyze the protective regime for children and adolescents’ sensitive information in Brazil’s General Personal Data Protection Law (LGPD), the appropriate legal bases for their management, and the best practices to be adopted. As a result, we have concluded that specific consent is not the only legal basis applicable to processing data from minors. However, it represents an important possibility of data management by legal guardians and the protection of underage people. In any case, the principles of necessity and transparency must be part of this choice process.","PeriodicalId":43663,"journal":{"name":"Revista Direito GV","volume":"140 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Direito GV","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-6172202335","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract With the spread of the new Coronavirus, Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) needed to adapt to this reality. The implementation of Emergency Remote Teaching (ERT) in Brazil relied on the experiences of distance education (EaD). Also, there was a significant increase in the use of remote testing tools that rely on monitoring (e-proctoring). This context has generated several concerns regarding the protection of vulnerable data subjects. The main objective of this article is to assess the processing of adolescents’ personal data by HEIs in the context of teaching activities carried out by digital means and the use of remote testing that include the collection of sensitive data. For this purpose, we aim to analyze the protective regime for children and adolescents’ sensitive information in Brazil’s General Personal Data Protection Law (LGPD), the appropriate legal bases for their management, and the best practices to be adopted. As a result, we have concluded that specific consent is not the only legal basis applicable to processing data from minors. However, it represents an important possibility of data management by legal guardians and the protection of underage people. In any case, the principles of necessity and transparency must be part of this choice process.
高等教育中青少年的个人数据:LGPD与数字媒体在教学活动和远程测试中的使用
随着新型冠状病毒的传播,高等院校需要适应这一现实。巴西应急远程教学的实施依赖于远程教育的经验。此外,依赖于监控(电子监考)的远程测试工具的使用也显著增加。这种情况产生了对易受攻击的数据主体的保护的若干关切。本文的主要目的是评估高等教育机构在通过数字手段进行教学活动和使用包括收集敏感数据的远程测试的背景下处理青少年个人数据的情况。为此,我们旨在分析巴西《一般个人数据保护法》(LGPD)中对儿童和青少年敏感信息的保护制度、管理儿童和青少年敏感信息的适当法律依据,以及应采取的最佳做法。因此,我们得出结论,明确同意不是处理未成年人数据的唯一法律依据。然而,它代表了由法定监护人管理数据和保护未成年人的重要可能性。无论如何,必要性和透明度原则必须成为这一选择进程的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
25.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
21 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信