Exploring Masculinity, Sexuality, and Culture in Gestalt Therapy: An Autoethnography

Peter Cole
{"title":"Exploring Masculinity, Sexuality, and Culture in Gestalt Therapy: An Autoethnography","authors":"Peter Cole","doi":"10.5325/gestaltreview.27.2.0188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Adam Kincel is a UK-based clinician, teacher, and researcher. His book Exploring Masculinity, Sexuality, and Culture in Gestalt Therapy contributes a unique integration of new research methodology (autoethnography), new philosophical influences (especially the work of Barad 2007), new concepts (such as collective gestalts), and new growth methodologies (such as working with large group experience to create dialogue around prejudice and hatred). His book is substantial in its breadth and depth and contains multiple layers of meaning and content. Kincel approaches his research and practice from a field-oriented, phenomenological perspective. Among his philosophical influences are the onto-epistemology of Barad, the phenomenology of Husserl and Merleau Ponty, the existentialism of Buber, and the dialogical approach of Gadamer.Key to Kincel’s integration is quantum physicist Barad’s (2007) concept of “agential intra-action.” Barad views phenomena from the perspective of “practice and actions.” Through the lens of practice and actions, we are simultaneously embedded in, and separate from, the relational matrix within which we exist. We are both connected and separate. This is a profoundly dialogical stance in which relationships—those between humans, those between humans and the natural world, and those that exist outside of human experience in the natural world—are at the core of reality. Barad’s is a process orientation in which all matter is interconnected, and those interconnections are at the heart of existence.In Kincel’s method, when a researcher studies phenomena in which they are embedded, for example, sexuality or culture, such research cannot be approached from the outside. Instead, the researcher endeavors to apply the discipline of creating separability or exteriority from within phenomena. Throughout this book, Kincel approaches his subjects concurrently from within and with exteriority. He is the observer and the observed, the one who acts and the one who is acted upon. Thus, his Gestalt therapy research is both highly personal and aimed broadly. The methodology he employs is “auto-ethnography.”Kincel explains that “auto-ethnography is a research methodology that focuses on personal memory as a valid source of knowledge” (114). In his analysis of masculinity, sexuality, and culture, he utilizes the tools of auto-ethnography, bringing forth his own experiences and personal narratives. He then uses ethnographic methodologies, such as interviews with family members, to situate his personal narrative in a field context, so that his personal experience helps illuminate our understanding of the constellation of issues being investigated: the development of sexuality, masculinity, and heteronormativity in the author’s cultural context, together with an exploration of the ways in which these issues are currently worked in Gestalt therapy. Along the way, he engages in valuable discussions related to the practice of Gestalt therapy. Among the many issues he addresses are: large group work, the use of touch in the therapy, homophobia as it shows up in the work, the clinical impact of a more directive approach versus the impact of a relational Gestalt approach, and the embodied experience of culture in Gestalt therapy practice.Importantly, Kincel positions his Gestalt method in the social and political. Early in the book, he introduces the term “collective gestalts.” As I understand it, collective gestalts relate to the identifications, introjects, and internalizations that we embody as a result of our connection to larger groups, such as national or ethnic groups. Here is Kincel’s concise definition: “A collective gestalt is an embodiment of social, political and cultural experiences through personal experiences. Defined in this way it can also include memories passed through generations” (19). Since being introduced to the concept of collective gestalts, I am finding that my clinical work has been enriched with new explorations of issues, such as culture, national and ethnic identity, and intergenerational trauma.Kincel’s approach makes for fascinating and exciting reading: he shares with the reader intimate and engagingly personal stories. Beyond just the stories, Kincel shares deeply and courageously of his history, his family of origin, his sexual development and identity, his childhood in communist Poland, his personal psychotherapy, and his Gestalt training. What we get is both personal and social history. He shares stories that represent distinct areas of his development: his sexual development, the development of how he holds and expresses his masculinity, the development of his cultural identity, and his development as a Gestalt therapist. All of these narratives intersect and impact one another and become part of the greater whole: a story of emergence, growth, and maturation.Exploring Masculinity, Sexuality and Culture in Gestalt Therapy marks the arrival of a major new voice in the Gestalt therapy literature. Kincel places himself squarely in Gestalt therapy’s intellectual and clinical practice traditions, weighing in on issues that have been central concerns of Gestalt therapy since its inception, such as the intersection of the personal and political, the impact of cultural and familial introjects, and body and sexual awareness. In these areas and many more, Kincel broadens our palette by introducing new ideas and influences. The reader is brought into the emergence of a deeply thoughtful, fully committed, keenly courageous Gestalt therapist who has profoundly integrated Gestalt’s literature and methodology, and who opens our eyes to exciting new pathways for our collective development.","PeriodicalId":499147,"journal":{"name":"Gestalt review","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gestalt review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/gestaltreview.27.2.0188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Adam Kincel is a UK-based clinician, teacher, and researcher. His book Exploring Masculinity, Sexuality, and Culture in Gestalt Therapy contributes a unique integration of new research methodology (autoethnography), new philosophical influences (especially the work of Barad 2007), new concepts (such as collective gestalts), and new growth methodologies (such as working with large group experience to create dialogue around prejudice and hatred). His book is substantial in its breadth and depth and contains multiple layers of meaning and content. Kincel approaches his research and practice from a field-oriented, phenomenological perspective. Among his philosophical influences are the onto-epistemology of Barad, the phenomenology of Husserl and Merleau Ponty, the existentialism of Buber, and the dialogical approach of Gadamer.Key to Kincel’s integration is quantum physicist Barad’s (2007) concept of “agential intra-action.” Barad views phenomena from the perspective of “practice and actions.” Through the lens of practice and actions, we are simultaneously embedded in, and separate from, the relational matrix within which we exist. We are both connected and separate. This is a profoundly dialogical stance in which relationships—those between humans, those between humans and the natural world, and those that exist outside of human experience in the natural world—are at the core of reality. Barad’s is a process orientation in which all matter is interconnected, and those interconnections are at the heart of existence.In Kincel’s method, when a researcher studies phenomena in which they are embedded, for example, sexuality or culture, such research cannot be approached from the outside. Instead, the researcher endeavors to apply the discipline of creating separability or exteriority from within phenomena. Throughout this book, Kincel approaches his subjects concurrently from within and with exteriority. He is the observer and the observed, the one who acts and the one who is acted upon. Thus, his Gestalt therapy research is both highly personal and aimed broadly. The methodology he employs is “auto-ethnography.”Kincel explains that “auto-ethnography is a research methodology that focuses on personal memory as a valid source of knowledge” (114). In his analysis of masculinity, sexuality, and culture, he utilizes the tools of auto-ethnography, bringing forth his own experiences and personal narratives. He then uses ethnographic methodologies, such as interviews with family members, to situate his personal narrative in a field context, so that his personal experience helps illuminate our understanding of the constellation of issues being investigated: the development of sexuality, masculinity, and heteronormativity in the author’s cultural context, together with an exploration of the ways in which these issues are currently worked in Gestalt therapy. Along the way, he engages in valuable discussions related to the practice of Gestalt therapy. Among the many issues he addresses are: large group work, the use of touch in the therapy, homophobia as it shows up in the work, the clinical impact of a more directive approach versus the impact of a relational Gestalt approach, and the embodied experience of culture in Gestalt therapy practice.Importantly, Kincel positions his Gestalt method in the social and political. Early in the book, he introduces the term “collective gestalts.” As I understand it, collective gestalts relate to the identifications, introjects, and internalizations that we embody as a result of our connection to larger groups, such as national or ethnic groups. Here is Kincel’s concise definition: “A collective gestalt is an embodiment of social, political and cultural experiences through personal experiences. Defined in this way it can also include memories passed through generations” (19). Since being introduced to the concept of collective gestalts, I am finding that my clinical work has been enriched with new explorations of issues, such as culture, national and ethnic identity, and intergenerational trauma.Kincel’s approach makes for fascinating and exciting reading: he shares with the reader intimate and engagingly personal stories. Beyond just the stories, Kincel shares deeply and courageously of his history, his family of origin, his sexual development and identity, his childhood in communist Poland, his personal psychotherapy, and his Gestalt training. What we get is both personal and social history. He shares stories that represent distinct areas of his development: his sexual development, the development of how he holds and expresses his masculinity, the development of his cultural identity, and his development as a Gestalt therapist. All of these narratives intersect and impact one another and become part of the greater whole: a story of emergence, growth, and maturation.Exploring Masculinity, Sexuality and Culture in Gestalt Therapy marks the arrival of a major new voice in the Gestalt therapy literature. Kincel places himself squarely in Gestalt therapy’s intellectual and clinical practice traditions, weighing in on issues that have been central concerns of Gestalt therapy since its inception, such as the intersection of the personal and political, the impact of cultural and familial introjects, and body and sexual awareness. In these areas and many more, Kincel broadens our palette by introducing new ideas and influences. The reader is brought into the emergence of a deeply thoughtful, fully committed, keenly courageous Gestalt therapist who has profoundly integrated Gestalt’s literature and methodology, and who opens our eyes to exciting new pathways for our collective development.
探索完形治疗中的男子气概、性和文化:一本自我民族志
Adam Kincel是英国的一名临床医生、教师和研究员。他的书《在完形治疗中探索男性气质、性和文化》为新的研究方法(自我民族志)、新的哲学影响(特别是Barad 2007年的作品)、新的概念(如集体完形)和新的成长方法(如利用大群体经验创造关于偏见和仇恨的对话)做出了独特的贡献。他的书在广度和深度上都很丰富,包含了多层次的意义和内容。金塞尔从一个面向领域的现象学角度来看待他的研究和实践。他的哲学影响包括巴拉德的本体认识论,胡塞尔和梅洛·庞蒂的现象学,布伯的存在主义,以及伽达默尔的对话方法。金塞尔整合的关键是量子物理学家巴拉德(Barad, 2007)的“代理内行动”概念。巴拉德从“实践与行动”的角度来看待现象。通过实践和行动的镜头,我们同时嵌入在我们存在的关系矩阵中,并与之分离。我们既联系又分离。这是一种深刻的对话立场,在这种立场下,人与人之间的关系,人与自然世界之间的关系,以及存在于人类经验之外的自然世界中的关系,都是现实的核心。巴拉德的理论是一个过程取向,在这个过程中,所有的物质都是相互联系的,而这些相互联系是存在的核心。在Kincel的方法中,当研究人员研究与他们相关的现象时,例如性或文化,这些研究不能从外部进行。相反,研究人员努力应用从现象内部创造可分离性或外部性的学科。在这本书中,金塞尔从内部和外部同时接近他的主题。他既是观察者又是被观察者,是行动的人又是被行动的人。因此,他的完形治疗研究既高度个人化,又目标广泛。他采用的方法是“自动人种学”。Kincel解释道,“自动人种学是一种研究方法,将个人记忆作为知识的有效来源”(114)。在他对男性气质、性和文化的分析中,他运用了自动人种学的工具,带来了他自己的经历和个人叙述。然后,他使用人种学方法,如与家庭成员的访谈,将他的个人叙述置于一个领域背景中,这样他的个人经历有助于阐明我们对正在调查的一系列问题的理解:在作者的文化背景下,性、男性气质和异性恋规范的发展,以及对这些问题目前在格式塔治疗中工作的方式的探索。在此过程中,他参与了与格式塔治疗实践相关的有价值的讨论。他提到的许多问题包括:大型团队工作,在治疗中使用触摸,在工作中出现的同性恋恐惧症,更直接的方法与关系格式塔方法的临床影响,以及格式塔治疗实践中体现的文化体验。重要的是,金塞尔将他的格式塔方法定位于社会和政治。在书的开头,他引入了“集体格式塔”这个术语。据我所知,集体完形与我们与更大的群体(如国家或种族群体)的联系所体现的认同、内省和内化有关。以下是金塞尔的简明定义:“集体完形是通过个人经历体现社会、政治和文化经验。按照这种方式定义,它也可以包括代代相传的记忆”(19)。自从被引入集体完形的概念,我发现我的临床工作已经丰富了新的问题的探索,如文化,国家和种族认同,以及代际创伤。金塞尔的方法使读者读起来既迷人又激动人心:他与读者分享了亲密而引人入胜的个人故事。除了这些故事,金塞尔还深入而勇敢地分享了他的历史、他的原生家庭、他的性发展和身份、他在共产主义波兰的童年、他的个人心理治疗和他的格式塔训练。我们得到的是个人和社会的历史。他分享了代表他发展的不同领域的故事:他的性发展,他如何保持和表达他的男子气概的发展,他的文化认同的发展,以及他作为完形治疗师的发展。所有这些故事相互交织,相互影响,成为更大整体的一部分:一个关于出现、成长和成熟的故事。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信