Analysis of the Knowledge Level of Slaughterhouse Employees and Evaluation of Online Training to Improve Animal Welfare

Svea Nicolaisen, Christa Thöne-Reineke, Lisa Buchwald, Harm Kuper, Mechthild Wiegard
{"title":"Analysis of the Knowledge Level of Slaughterhouse Employees and Evaluation of Online Training to Improve Animal Welfare","authors":"Svea Nicolaisen, Christa Thöne-Reineke, Lisa Buchwald, Harm Kuper, Mechthild Wiegard","doi":"10.26502/jfsnr.2642-110000138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study focused on the importance of animal welfare and the need for training in the livestock industry, particularly in slaughterhouse. It reflects the public concern over animal suffering during transport and slaughter. The research aimed to assess the knowledge of slaughterhouse employees before and after their participation in an e-learning program and to evaluate their assessment of the e-learning program, with the goal of improving online training materials for animal welfare in livestock transport and slaughter. This study utilized an online platform to deliver an e-learning program on animal behavior and cattle handling. The program consisted of two pilot modules with training videos. For each module, an evaluation and a pre-test and post-test were conducted using the same set of questions. Participants were employees in German cattle slaughterhouses, and data was collected through animal welfare officers. This study involved 25 participants, predominantly German-speaking, who completed two pilot modules, a knowledge test, and an evaluation. The participants had diverse demographic characteristics, with varying years of experience and educational backgrounds. German-speaking participants performed better in the pre-test of the animal behavior module, while Romanian-speaking participants scored higher in the post-test. Romanianspeaking participants also outperformed in the cattle handling module. There was a significant improvement in scores from pre-test to posttest in both language groups. Some specific questions were sometimes incorrectly answered in the pre-test but were correctly answered in the post-test. Romanian-speaking participants took longer, potentially due to translation difficulties. Limitations included participant selection and the lack of long-term assessment. Overall, the results suggest that participants had prior knowledge, while knowledge pertaining to specific questions was improved by e-learning, possibly influenced by video-based learning.","PeriodicalId":15858,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Science and Nutrition Research","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Science and Nutrition Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26502/jfsnr.2642-110000138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study focused on the importance of animal welfare and the need for training in the livestock industry, particularly in slaughterhouse. It reflects the public concern over animal suffering during transport and slaughter. The research aimed to assess the knowledge of slaughterhouse employees before and after their participation in an e-learning program and to evaluate their assessment of the e-learning program, with the goal of improving online training materials for animal welfare in livestock transport and slaughter. This study utilized an online platform to deliver an e-learning program on animal behavior and cattle handling. The program consisted of two pilot modules with training videos. For each module, an evaluation and a pre-test and post-test were conducted using the same set of questions. Participants were employees in German cattle slaughterhouses, and data was collected through animal welfare officers. This study involved 25 participants, predominantly German-speaking, who completed two pilot modules, a knowledge test, and an evaluation. The participants had diverse demographic characteristics, with varying years of experience and educational backgrounds. German-speaking participants performed better in the pre-test of the animal behavior module, while Romanian-speaking participants scored higher in the post-test. Romanianspeaking participants also outperformed in the cattle handling module. There was a significant improvement in scores from pre-test to posttest in both language groups. Some specific questions were sometimes incorrectly answered in the pre-test but were correctly answered in the post-test. Romanian-speaking participants took longer, potentially due to translation difficulties. Limitations included participant selection and the lack of long-term assessment. Overall, the results suggest that participants had prior knowledge, while knowledge pertaining to specific questions was improved by e-learning, possibly influenced by video-based learning.
屠宰场员工知识水平分析及在线培训对提高动物福利的评价
这项研究的重点是动物福利的重要性和畜牧业特别是屠宰场培训的必要性。这反映了公众对动物在运输和屠宰过程中遭受痛苦的关注。该研究旨在评估屠宰场员工参与电子学习计划前后的知识,并评估他们对电子学习计划的评估,目的是改进牲畜运输和屠宰中动物福利的在线培训材料。这项研究利用一个在线平台,提供了一个关于动物行为和牛处理的电子学习项目。该计划包括两个带有培训视频的试点模块。对于每个模块,使用相同的一组问题进行评估和前测和后测。参与者是德国牛屠宰场的雇员,数据由动物福利官员收集。这项研究涉及25名参与者,主要是讲德语的人,他们完成了两个试点模块,一个知识测试和一个评估。参与者的人口特征各不相同,经验年限和教育背景各不相同。讲德语的参与者在动物行为模块的前测中表现更好,而讲罗马尼亚语的参与者在后测中得分更高。说罗马尼亚语的参与者在牲畜处理模块中也表现出色。从测试前到测试后,两个语言组的得分都有显著提高。一些特定的问题有时在前测中回答错误,但在后测中回答正确。说罗马尼亚语的参与者花了更长的时间,可能是由于翻译困难。局限性包括受试者选择和缺乏长期评估。总体而言,结果表明参与者有先验知识,而与特定问题有关的知识通过电子学习得到改善,可能受到基于视频的学习的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信