Peer-to-peer clinical teaching by medical students in the formal curriculum

Julie Yun Chen, Tai Pong Lam, Ivan Fan Ngai Hung, Albert Chi Yan Chan, Weng-Yee Chin, Christopher See, Joyce Pui Yan Tsang
{"title":"Peer-to-peer clinical teaching by medical students in the formal curriculum","authors":"Julie Yun Chen, Tai Pong Lam, Ivan Fan Ngai Hung, Albert Chi Yan Chan, Weng-Yee Chin, Christopher See, Joyce Pui Yan Tsang","doi":"10.29060/taps.2023-8-4/oa3093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Medical students have long provided informal, structured academic support for their peers in parallel with the institution’s formal curriculum, demonstrating a high degree of motivation and engagement for peer teaching. This qualitative descriptive study aimed to examine the perspectives of participants in a pilot peer teaching programme on the effectiveness and feasibility of adapting existing student-initiated peer bedside teaching into formal bedside teaching. Methods: Study participants were senior medical students who were already providing self-initiated peer-led bedside clinical teaching, clinicians who co-taught bedside clinical skills teaching sessions with the peer teachers and junior students allocated to the bedside teaching sessions led by peer teachers. Qualitative data were gathered via evaluation form, peer teacher and clinician interviews, as well as the observational field notes made by the research assistant who attended the teaching sessions as an independent observer. Additionally, a single Likert-scale question on the evaluation form was used to rate teaching effectiveness. Results: All three peer teachers, three clinicians and 12 students completed the interviews and/or questionnaires. The main themes identified were teaching effectiveness, teaching competency and feasibility. Teaching effectiveness related to the creation of a positive learning environment and a tailored approach. Teaching competency reflected confidence or doubts about peer-teaching, and feasibility subthemes comprised barriers and facilitators. Conclusion: Students perceived peer teaching effectiveness to be comparable to clinicians’ teaching. Clinical peer teaching in the formal curriculum may be most feasible in a hybrid curriculum that includes both peer teaching and clinician-led teaching with structured training and coordinated timetabling. Keywords: Peer Teaching, Undergraduate Medical Education, Bedside Teaching, Medical Students","PeriodicalId":494652,"journal":{"name":"The Asia Pacific Scholar","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Asia Pacific Scholar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29060/taps.2023-8-4/oa3093","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Medical students have long provided informal, structured academic support for their peers in parallel with the institution’s formal curriculum, demonstrating a high degree of motivation and engagement for peer teaching. This qualitative descriptive study aimed to examine the perspectives of participants in a pilot peer teaching programme on the effectiveness and feasibility of adapting existing student-initiated peer bedside teaching into formal bedside teaching. Methods: Study participants were senior medical students who were already providing self-initiated peer-led bedside clinical teaching, clinicians who co-taught bedside clinical skills teaching sessions with the peer teachers and junior students allocated to the bedside teaching sessions led by peer teachers. Qualitative data were gathered via evaluation form, peer teacher and clinician interviews, as well as the observational field notes made by the research assistant who attended the teaching sessions as an independent observer. Additionally, a single Likert-scale question on the evaluation form was used to rate teaching effectiveness. Results: All three peer teachers, three clinicians and 12 students completed the interviews and/or questionnaires. The main themes identified were teaching effectiveness, teaching competency and feasibility. Teaching effectiveness related to the creation of a positive learning environment and a tailored approach. Teaching competency reflected confidence or doubts about peer-teaching, and feasibility subthemes comprised barriers and facilitators. Conclusion: Students perceived peer teaching effectiveness to be comparable to clinicians’ teaching. Clinical peer teaching in the formal curriculum may be most feasible in a hybrid curriculum that includes both peer teaching and clinician-led teaching with structured training and coordinated timetabling. Keywords: Peer Teaching, Undergraduate Medical Education, Bedside Teaching, Medical Students
医学生在正规课程中的点对点临床教学
导读:长期以来,医学院的学生一直在为他们的同龄人提供非正式的、结构化的学术支持,与该机构的正式课程并行,这显示出他们对同伴教学的高度积极性和参与度。本定性描述性研究旨在考察同伴教学试点项目参与者的观点,探讨将现有的由学生发起的同伴床边教学转变为正式的床边教学的有效性和可行性。方法:研究对象为已经开展自主的同伴临床床边教学的高年级医学生、与同伴教师共同教授床边临床技能教学的临床医生和分配到同伴教师领导的床边教学的低年级学生。质性资料的收集方式包括评估表格、同行教师和临床医生访谈,以及研究助理作为独立观察员参加教学的现场观察笔记。此外,在评估表格上使用一个李克特量表问题来评估教学效果。结果:3名同行教师、3名临床医生和12名学生完成了访谈和/或问卷调查。确定的主要主题是教学有效性、教学能力和可行性。教学效果与创造积极的学习环境和量身定制的方法有关。教学能力反映了对同伴教学的信心或怀疑,可行性子主题包括障碍和促进因素。结论:学生对同伴教学效果的感知与临床医生的教学效果相当。正式课程中的临床同伴教学在混合课程中可能是最可行的,混合课程包括同伴教学和临床医生主导的教学,有组织的培训和协调的时间表。关键词:同伴教学,本科医学教育,床边教学,医学生
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信