Soumia Merrou, Abdellah Idrissi Jouicha, Abdelmounaim Baslam, Zakaria Ouhaz, Ahmed Rhassane El Adib
{"title":"Problem-based learning method in the context of a flipped classroom: Outcomes on pain management course acquisition","authors":"Soumia Merrou, Abdellah Idrissi Jouicha, Abdelmounaim Baslam, Zakaria Ouhaz, Ahmed Rhassane El Adib","doi":"10.29060/taps.2023-8-4/oa2883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: A deep understanding of physiology, physiopathology, pharmacology, and the management of pain is crucial for nurse anaesthetists to ensure the well-being of their patients. Thus, the teaching strategies should enhance the transition from acquiring the fundamental pain phenomena, to developing translational and critical thinking. The aim of the study is to determine if the flipped classroom that is considered an active learning approach is most effective compared to the traditional method in teaching pain management and if it improves students' academic performance. Methods: This study was quasi experimental, at a higher institute of nursing professions, among third-year anaesthesia resuscitation nursing students. participants were randomly allocated into either: the flipped classroom group where PBL was used (FG, n = 19), or the traditional lecture-based classroom group (TG, n = 19). The results and impact of the above approach were appreciated via the analysis of the summative assessment of the class group and from the questionnaire submitted to students. Results: The present study revealed that in the midterm exam, the mean score of the flipped classroom group (14.0) which is significantly higher (p<0.01) than the traditional lecture group (11.9). Moreover, the standard deviation of this latter is slightly higher (2.41) which indicates scores far from the average. Also, a significant difference between the averages of the two approaches in favor of flipped classroom Group was revealed (p<0.01). Conclusion: The assessment of student’s grades and their appreciation of both teaching approaches showed a preference for the PBL. Keywords: Flipped Classroom, Nursing Education, Pain Management, Problem-Based Learning","PeriodicalId":494652,"journal":{"name":"The Asia Pacific Scholar","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Asia Pacific Scholar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29060/taps.2023-8-4/oa2883","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: A deep understanding of physiology, physiopathology, pharmacology, and the management of pain is crucial for nurse anaesthetists to ensure the well-being of their patients. Thus, the teaching strategies should enhance the transition from acquiring the fundamental pain phenomena, to developing translational and critical thinking. The aim of the study is to determine if the flipped classroom that is considered an active learning approach is most effective compared to the traditional method in teaching pain management and if it improves students' academic performance. Methods: This study was quasi experimental, at a higher institute of nursing professions, among third-year anaesthesia resuscitation nursing students. participants were randomly allocated into either: the flipped classroom group where PBL was used (FG, n = 19), or the traditional lecture-based classroom group (TG, n = 19). The results and impact of the above approach were appreciated via the analysis of the summative assessment of the class group and from the questionnaire submitted to students. Results: The present study revealed that in the midterm exam, the mean score of the flipped classroom group (14.0) which is significantly higher (p<0.01) than the traditional lecture group (11.9). Moreover, the standard deviation of this latter is slightly higher (2.41) which indicates scores far from the average. Also, a significant difference between the averages of the two approaches in favor of flipped classroom Group was revealed (p<0.01). Conclusion: The assessment of student’s grades and their appreciation of both teaching approaches showed a preference for the PBL. Keywords: Flipped Classroom, Nursing Education, Pain Management, Problem-Based Learning
对生理学、生理病理学、药理学和疼痛管理的深刻理解对于麻醉师护士确保患者的健康至关重要。因此,教学策略应加强从获取基本疼痛现象到培养翻译思维和批判性思维的转变。本研究的目的是确定与传统的疼痛管理教学方法相比,被认为是一种主动学习方法的翻转课堂是否最有效,以及它是否提高了学生的学习成绩。方法:本研究采用准实验方法,在某高等护理专业学院麻醉复苏护理专业三年级学生中进行。参与者被随机分配到:使用PBL的翻转课堂组(FG, n = 19)或传统的基于讲座的课堂组(TG, n = 19)。通过对班级总结性评估的分析和提交给学生的调查问卷,对上述方法的结果和影响表示赞赏。结果:本研究发现,在期中考试中,翻转课堂组学生的平均分为14.0分,显著高于传统课堂组的11.9分(p<0.01)。而且,后者的标准差略高,为2.41,表明得分与平均水平相差甚远。此外,两种方法的平均值也有显著差异(p<0.01)。结论:学生的成绩评价和对两种教学方法的评价均表现出对PBL教学法的偏好。关键词:翻转课堂;护理教育;疼痛管理