Perlindungan terhadap Ibu Pengganti (Surrogate Mother) dalam Prespektif Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia di Indonesia

Alifia Qintarawati
{"title":"Perlindungan terhadap Ibu Pengganti (Surrogate Mother) dalam Prespektif Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia di Indonesia","authors":"Alifia Qintarawati","doi":"10.55606/birokrasi.v1i4.655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aims to find out about the protection of human rights and international human rights regarding the practice of Surrogate Mother and to find evidence that there are no legal provisions that can protect the human rights of all parties involved in this practice. This type of research is normative legal research. Through a legislative approach that applies in Indonesia. The results of this research show that the practice of renting a womb violates human rights. The practice of surrogacy or womb renting cannot be implemented in Indonesia because it is considered to violate the human rights of mothers who rent out their wombs to have offspring from a valid marriage in accordance with article 28 paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution. Apart from that, when an agreement is made, the agreement is not recognized or considered invalid because a woman's womb is not an object of an agreement. Apart from that, the unclear status of the children born can cause defects if inbreeding occurs. These legal findings show that there are no clear legal provisions that can protect the human rights of all parties involved, including children born as a result of this practice. The legality of renting a womb in international human rights helps married couples to have children. As a form of absolute right as a human right which is also regulated in international instruments including the UDHR and CEDAW.
 
 This research aims to find out about the protection of human rights and international human rights regarding the practice of Surrogate Mother and to find evidence that there are no legal provisions that can protect the human rights of all parties involved in this practice. This type of research is normative legal research. Through a legislative approach that applies in Indonesia. The results of this research show that the practice of renting a womb violates human rights. The practice of surrogacy or womb renting cannot be implemented in Indonesia because it is considered to violate the human rights of mothers who rent out their wombs to have offspring from a valid marriage in accordance with article 28 paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution. Apart from that, when an agreement is made, the agreement is not recognized or considered invalid because a woman's womb is not an object of an agreement. Apart from that, the unclear status of the children born can cause defects if inbreeding occurs. These legal findings show that there are no clear legal provisions that can protect the human rights of all parties involved, including children born as a result of this practice. The legality of renting a womb in international human rights helps married couples to have children. As a form of absolute right as a human right which is also regulated in international instruments including the UDHR and CEDAW.","PeriodicalId":486944,"journal":{"name":"Birokrasi JURNAL ILMU HUKUM DAN TATA NEGARA","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Birokrasi JURNAL ILMU HUKUM DAN TATA NEGARA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55606/birokrasi.v1i4.655","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research aims to find out about the protection of human rights and international human rights regarding the practice of Surrogate Mother and to find evidence that there are no legal provisions that can protect the human rights of all parties involved in this practice. This type of research is normative legal research. Through a legislative approach that applies in Indonesia. The results of this research show that the practice of renting a womb violates human rights. The practice of surrogacy or womb renting cannot be implemented in Indonesia because it is considered to violate the human rights of mothers who rent out their wombs to have offspring from a valid marriage in accordance with article 28 paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution. Apart from that, when an agreement is made, the agreement is not recognized or considered invalid because a woman's womb is not an object of an agreement. Apart from that, the unclear status of the children born can cause defects if inbreeding occurs. These legal findings show that there are no clear legal provisions that can protect the human rights of all parties involved, including children born as a result of this practice. The legality of renting a womb in international human rights helps married couples to have children. As a form of absolute right as a human right which is also regulated in international instruments including the UDHR and CEDAW. This research aims to find out about the protection of human rights and international human rights regarding the practice of Surrogate Mother and to find evidence that there are no legal provisions that can protect the human rights of all parties involved in this practice. This type of research is normative legal research. Through a legislative approach that applies in Indonesia. The results of this research show that the practice of renting a womb violates human rights. The practice of surrogacy or womb renting cannot be implemented in Indonesia because it is considered to violate the human rights of mothers who rent out their wombs to have offspring from a valid marriage in accordance with article 28 paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution. Apart from that, when an agreement is made, the agreement is not recognized or considered invalid because a woman's womb is not an object of an agreement. Apart from that, the unclear status of the children born can cause defects if inbreeding occurs. These legal findings show that there are no clear legal provisions that can protect the human rights of all parties involved, including children born as a result of this practice. The legality of renting a womb in international human rights helps married couples to have children. As a form of absolute right as a human right which is also regulated in international instruments including the UDHR and CEDAW.
在印尼人权法律期内保护代孕母亲
本研究旨在了解代孕母亲实践的人权保护和国际人权保护,并找到证据表明没有法律规定可以保护代孕母亲实践中各方的人权。这种类型的研究就是规范性法律研究。通过适用于印度尼西亚的立法方法。这项研究的结果表明,租用子宫的做法违反了人权。印度尼西亚不能实施代孕或租用子宫的做法,因为根据1945年《宪法》第28条第(1)款,这被认为侵犯了母亲出租子宫以从有效婚姻中生育后代的人权。除此之外,当达成协议时,该协议不被承认或视为无效,因为妇女的子宫不是协议的对象。除此之外,如果发生近亲繁殖,出生的孩子身份不明确可能会导致缺陷。这些法律调查结果表明,没有明确的法律规定可以保护所有有关各方的人权,包括因这种做法而出生的儿童。国际人权中租用子宫的合法性有助于已婚夫妇生育。作为一种绝对权利的人权形式,也受到包括《世界人权宣言》和《消除对妇女一切形式歧视公约》在内的国际文书的规定。& # x0D;本研究旨在了解代孕母亲实践的人权保护和国际人权保护,并找到证据表明没有法律规定可以保护代孕母亲实践中各方的人权。这种类型的研究就是规范性法律研究。通过适用于印度尼西亚的立法方法。这项研究的结果表明,租用子宫的做法违反了人权。印度尼西亚不能实施代孕或租用子宫的做法,因为根据1945年《宪法》第28条第(1)款,这被认为侵犯了母亲出租子宫以从有效婚姻中生育后代的人权。除此之外,当达成协议时,该协议不被承认或视为无效,因为妇女的子宫不是协议的对象。除此之外,如果发生近亲繁殖,出生的孩子身份不明确可能会导致缺陷。这些法律调查结果表明,没有明确的法律规定可以保护所有有关各方的人权,包括因这种做法而出生的儿童。国际人权中租用子宫的合法性有助于已婚夫妇生育。作为一种绝对权利的形式,作为一项人权,也在包括《世界人权宣言》和《消除对妇女歧视公约》在内的国际文书中加以规定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信