Legal Protection for Buyers of Joint Assets Sold Without Wife's Consent

Andi Dimah Laila Nurfaiqah, Tjempaka Tjempaka
{"title":"Legal Protection for Buyers of Joint Assets Sold Without Wife's Consent","authors":"Andi Dimah Laila Nurfaiqah, Tjempaka Tjempaka","doi":"10.56087/substantivejustice.v6i2.256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article aims to provide an objective explanation of the legal protection afforded to buyers who intend to transfer rights to land that is jointly owned without the wife's consent. In 2012, the late Haryanto sold the land to PT. Makmur Persada Indonesia conducted the transaction as recorded in Sale and Purchase Deed No. 53/2012, prepared by Notary/Land Deed Maker Hj. Hasnawati Juweni Shande. In 2017, Sherly initiated legal action asserting that the deed for the land sold by the deceased Haryanto reflected joint ownership resulting from his marriage to Sherly; yet, the relevant sale and purchase transaction occurred without Sherly's involvement despite her rights to the property. Normative research was conducted utilising a statutory, conceptual, and case approach. The research specifically analysed secondary data, comprising primary and secondary legal materials, which was analysed descriptively. In relation to Sherly's lawsuit, the Serang District Court issued decision Number 39/Pdt. Srg, which resulted in the rejection of the plaintiff's application. Subsequently, the plaintiff lodged an appeal against the Serang Court's decision. In 2018, Decision Number 39/Pdt/2018/PT BTN of the Banten High Court upheld the Serang District Court's decision to reject the applicant's claim entirely. The Supreme Court confirmed this judgement in 2019 with Judicial Review Decision Number 227K/Pdt/2019, thus dismissing the plaintiff's lawsuit. Thus, it seems that the verdict of dismissing the plaintiff's application safeguards the buyer.","PeriodicalId":239399,"journal":{"name":"Substantive Justice International Journal of Law","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substantive Justice International Journal of Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56087/substantivejustice.v6i2.256","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article aims to provide an objective explanation of the legal protection afforded to buyers who intend to transfer rights to land that is jointly owned without the wife's consent. In 2012, the late Haryanto sold the land to PT. Makmur Persada Indonesia conducted the transaction as recorded in Sale and Purchase Deed No. 53/2012, prepared by Notary/Land Deed Maker Hj. Hasnawati Juweni Shande. In 2017, Sherly initiated legal action asserting that the deed for the land sold by the deceased Haryanto reflected joint ownership resulting from his marriage to Sherly; yet, the relevant sale and purchase transaction occurred without Sherly's involvement despite her rights to the property. Normative research was conducted utilising a statutory, conceptual, and case approach. The research specifically analysed secondary data, comprising primary and secondary legal materials, which was analysed descriptively. In relation to Sherly's lawsuit, the Serang District Court issued decision Number 39/Pdt. Srg, which resulted in the rejection of the plaintiff's application. Subsequently, the plaintiff lodged an appeal against the Serang Court's decision. In 2018, Decision Number 39/Pdt/2018/PT BTN of the Banten High Court upheld the Serang District Court's decision to reject the applicant's claim entirely. The Supreme Court confirmed this judgement in 2019 with Judicial Review Decision Number 227K/Pdt/2019, thus dismissing the plaintiff's lawsuit. Thus, it seems that the verdict of dismissing the plaintiff's application safeguards the buyer.
未经妻子同意出售共同财产买受人的法律保护
本文旨在客观地解释在未经妻子同意的情况下有意转让共同拥有的土地权利的买方所受的法律保护。2012年,已故的Haryanto将土地出售给PT. Makmur Persada Indonesia进行了交易,交易记录在公证人/土地契约制造商Hj准备的第53/2012号买卖契约中。Hasnawati Juweni Shande。2017年,雪莉提起法律诉讼,声称已故的哈里扬托出售的土地契约反映了他与雪莉婚姻所产生的共同所有权;然而,相关的买卖交易是在雪莉没有参与的情况下进行的,尽管她对该物业拥有权利。规范性研究是利用法定、概念和案例方法进行的。该研究具体分析了二手数据,包括初级和二级法律材料,这是描述性的分析。关于雪莉的诉讼,雪朗地方法院发布了第39/Pdt号判决。Srg,导致原告的申请被驳回。随后,原告对雪朗法院的判决提出上诉。2018年,万丹高等法院第39/Pdt/2018/PT BTN号判决维持了雪朗地方法院完全驳回申请人索赔的决定。最高法院于2019年以第227K/Pdt/2019号司法审查决定确认了这一判决,从而驳回了原告的诉讼。因此,驳回原告申请的判决似乎保护了买方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信